Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Spud »

Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Spud »

Carl Thompson on Haye/Klitschko:

Thompson on Haye/Klitschko
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Carbo »

Spud wrote:Read this:

W arren on Haye/Klitschko
Nice one, Spudley
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Dioufy »

How can Twat face say that Haye was hurt against Barrett. Yes, he went over, but how can he categorically say that Haye was hurt from that counter? To my recollection, Haye was hit massively when he was already down. Perhaps that's what hurt him?
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Quixall »

Tell us something we don't already know Frank :o

Haye was never going to try and out-box Klitschko, because that is'nt where his advantages lay. Haye is fighting in Germany, the adopted home of the Klitschko's, he suffers with stamina problems, so a long distance fight was never going to be in the plans. Haye will try and bomb Klitschko out, within the first six rounds, after that it's all unknown territory, but we all know about the "If Wlad hits him on the chin" theory.
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Quixall »

Dioufy wrote:How can Twat face say that Haye was hurt against Barrett. Yes, he went over, but how can he categorically say that Haye was hurt from that counter? To my recollection, Haye was hit massively when he was already down. Perhaps that's what hurt him?
If a fighter is not in his stablle...........He hates them !!

Look at Hamed, Calzaghe, Hatton.........and they used to be with him :-?

That's your answer
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Dioufy »

Yep, and he makes it blatantly obvious. He reminds me of an ex-girlfriend who couldn't let go.
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1956
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by liamlion »

F wank: "Although he beat Enzo Maccarinelli, Enzo wobbled him in the first round".

Oh yeah, since when?? What a load of bollocks!
fatman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 206
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 05:16

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by fatman »

liamlion wrote:F wank: "Although he beat Enzo Maccarinelli, Enzo wobbled him in the first round".

Oh yeah, since when?? What a load of bollocks!
Big Mac never hurt Haye, that is rubbish

Klitschko will knock him out though, Klitschko is a different class to Haye, I hope David is making a few quid because he won't win. He could have made himself rich by beating all the other heavyweights but Wlad will derail him, no doubt.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by states »

allegedly in failing to praise fighter he doesn't promote shocker. :roll:
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

liamlion wrote:F wank: "Although he beat Enzo Maccarinelli, Enzo wobbled him in the first round".

Oh yeah, since when?? What a load of bollocks!
he makes this stuff up i tell ya. :oops:

what a sad bitter old man he really is. :roll:
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Finn »

fatman wrote:
liamlion wrote:F wank: "Although he beat Enzo Maccarinelli, Enzo wobbled him in the first round".

Oh yeah, since when?? What a load of bollocks!
Big Mac never hurt Haye, that is rubbish

Klitschko will knock him out though, Klitschko is a different class to Haye, I hope David is making a few quid because he won't win. He could have made himself rich by beating all the other heavyweights but Wlad will derail him, no doubt.
He's not a different class to haye, if haye looses it will be due to size.
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by josh fg »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:
liamlion wrote:F wank: "Although he beat Enzo Maccarinelli, Enzo wobbled him in the first round".

Oh yeah, since when?? What a load of bollocks!
he makes this stuff up i tell ya. :oops:

what a sad bitter old man he really is. :roll:
Well haye stumbled after a scuffed shot to the temple from Mac in the first round I thought the most extraordinary thing about the comments was him criticising haye for being KDed by "a Journeyman" Monte Barrette before going on to talk about how great Khan was when Gomez who is much more in the journeyman mold than Barrett knocked him down.
RJP
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 139
Joined: 05 Dec 2008, 15:35

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by RJP »

Dioufy wrote:Yep, and he makes it blatantly obvious. He reminds me of an ex-girlfriend who couldn't let go.
So true. It's time to move on babe x
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by TheCobra »

So now Haye was hurt against Maccarinelli? fornicate off Warren you absolutely massive twat.
mahatma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 262
Joined: 23 Feb 2009, 16:22

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by mahatma »

well at the risk of the wrath of the forum i entirely agree with warren on the matter of wlad v haye.

haye has done remarkably well and i wish him well in his fight with wlad, hope he wins but he has a very fragile chin which goes back to his amateur days.

We all know of his defeat to Thompson and heroics against mormeck but in the amateurs he was sparked on a couple of occasions one against jim twite(triumph club) in about 30 seconds ABa's semis i think and one against someone else whose name escapes me but i think im right he didnt win an ABA title.

Wlad is too big,strong and will walk through him inside 5 rounds
Khaosai-Galaxy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2739
Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Khaosai-Galaxy »

Once again, before you lot start gathering outside Frank's offices with pitchforks and torches


allegedly is a boxing promoter




that is all
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Autobarn »

Warren's just BIASED

Toward HIS OWN FIGHTERS

You heard it here first!

:lol:
TempleSlave
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 579
Joined: 11 May 2008, 05:24

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by TempleSlave »

Spud wrote:Carl Thompson on Haye/Klitschko:

Thompson on Haye/Klitschko
CAT: "I could still whup those cruiserweights, because it is a dead division."
Umm... no you couldn't and no it is not!
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16891
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Autobarn wrote:Warren's just BIASED

Toward HIS OWN FIGHTERS

You heard it here first!

:lol:
.......until they leave him. He does make me laugh, in his last column, he actually criticised JMM v PBF for being on ppv WTF :oo :DDD :lol:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Autobarn »

Nightmare Roy wrote:
Autobarn wrote:Warren's just BIASED

Toward HIS OWN FIGHTERS

You heard it here first!

:lol:
.......until they leave him. He does make me laugh, in his last column, he actually criticised JMM v PBF for being on ppv WTF :oo :DDD :lol:
yeah i bet his fighters keep quiet around him nowadays. can they get confidentiality clauses or something?
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Autobarn »

TempleSlave wrote:
Spud wrote:Carl Thompson on Haye/Klitschko:

Thompson on Haye/Klitschko
CAT: "I could still whup those cruiserweights, because it is a dead division."
Umm... no you couldn't and no it is not!
Thompson may have beaten Haye. But CAT never unified cruiser, or got a shot at a major heavyweight champ so I wouldn't take what the old warrior says as the gospel.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45235
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

TempleSlave wrote:
Spud wrote:Carl Thompson on Haye/Klitschko:

Thompson on Haye/Klitschko
CAT: "I could still whup those cruiserweights, because it is a dead division."
Umm... no you couldn't and no it is not!
Two words.........Frederic Serrat.
dbf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 11:06

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by dbf »

josh fg wrote:
hitman_hatton1 wrote:
liamlion wrote:F wank: "Although he beat Enzo Maccarinelli, Enzo wobbled him in the first round".

Oh yeah, since when?? What a load of bollocks!
he makes this stuff up i tell ya. :oops:

what a sad bitter old man he really is. :roll:
Well haye stumbled after a scuffed shot to the temple from Mac in the first round I thought the most extraordinary thing about the comments was him criticising haye for being KDed by "a Journeyman" Monte Barrette before going on to talk about how great Khan was when Gomez who is much more in the journeyman mold than Barrett knocked him down.
The shot that 'wobbled' Haye clipped his shoulder and he stumbled. No way was he hurt.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Mr W arren - on Haye/Klitschko

Post by Chambers2 »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
TempleSlave wrote:
Spud wrote:Carl Thompson on Haye/Klitschko:

Thompson on Haye/Klitschko
CAT: "I could still whup those cruiserweights, because it is a dead division."
Umm... no you couldn't and no it is not!
Two words.........Frederic Serrat.
Nuff said
Post Reply