A little favour
-
glittermonkey
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2658
- Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03
A little favour
I don't ask for much, in fact i hardly ask for anything. With this in mind i would like to ask everyone to help me out (it has to be everyone aswell).
Over on the current scene a debate is raging over who is the best welter in the world right now. One chap is using this debate to try and prove that the boxrec rankings are illogical. This guy has struck me as being a little bit of an arse and more than a little arrogant, so in order to teach the fella the error of his ways, i propose that his poll should be hijacked.
Here's the thread in question
http://www.boxrec.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=20879
Please give your vote to Margarito. Regardless of who you think is the better fighter, and regardless of what you think about the ratings, i would ask you to give just a minute of your time to help me out on this one, and in doing so help save boxrec from descending into anarchy and total chaos.
Thank you in advance for your time and effort in helping to resolve this matter.
Over on the current scene a debate is raging over who is the best welter in the world right now. One chap is using this debate to try and prove that the boxrec rankings are illogical. This guy has struck me as being a little bit of an arse and more than a little arrogant, so in order to teach the fella the error of his ways, i propose that his poll should be hijacked.
Here's the thread in question
http://www.boxrec.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=20879
Please give your vote to Margarito. Regardless of who you think is the better fighter, and regardless of what you think about the ratings, i would ask you to give just a minute of your time to help me out on this one, and in doing so help save boxrec from descending into anarchy and total chaos.
Thank you in advance for your time and effort in helping to resolve this matter.
-
glittermonkey
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2658
- Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03
Thanks guys.
It's not that i totally disagree with his viewpoint, in fact i think he makes some valid points.
What i didn't like was the fact that he continued to rant and rave about the rankings despite the fact that Computerrank had gone out of his way to answer the guys questions and explain the way the system works. I just didn't think that Computerrank deserved to have his work rubbished and belittled by someone who didn't even have the manners to say thanks for the answers he received.
As for you Bubi, i presume you were joking mate.
It's not that i totally disagree with his viewpoint, in fact i think he makes some valid points.
What i didn't like was the fact that he continued to rant and rave about the rankings despite the fact that Computerrank had gone out of his way to answer the guys questions and explain the way the system works. I just didn't think that Computerrank deserved to have his work rubbished and belittled by someone who didn't even have the manners to say thanks for the answers he received.
As for you Bubi, i presume you were joking mate.
-
BubiScholz
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1879
- Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 13:02
jup. i like the british forum here. the best knowledge in boxing is here on this forum. i´ve learned a lot here, especially from bennies posts, who is a kind of boxing bible.glittermonkey wrote:Thanks guys.
It's not that i totally disagree with his viewpoint, in fact i think he makes some valid points.
What i didn't like was the fact that he continued to rant and rave about the rankings despite the fact that Computerrank had gone out of his way to answer the guys questions and explain the way the system works. I just didn't think that Computerrank deserved to have his work rubbished and belittled by someone who didn't even have the manners to say thanks for the answers he received.
As for you Bubi, i presume you were joking mate.
Stop creeping.BubiScholz wrote:jup. i like the british forum here. the best knowledge in boxing is here on this forum. i´ve learned a lot here, especially from bennies posts, who is a kind of boxing bible.glittermonkey wrote:Thanks guys.
It's not that i totally disagree with his viewpoint, in fact i think he makes some valid points.
What i didn't like was the fact that he continued to rant and rave about the rankings despite the fact that Computerrank had gone out of his way to answer the guys questions and explain the way the system works. I just didn't think that Computerrank deserved to have his work rubbished and belittled by someone who didn't even have the manners to say thanks for the answers he received.
As for you Bubi, i presume you were joking mate.![]()
![]()
glittermonkey
glittermonkey - say hello to dan rose aka "mayorga is dangerous" or "still dangerous". absolute idiot that in one infamous post though the temple was at the centre of the head (rather than the side). Did frequent boxingtalk a while ago but moved on to be an arse somewhere else.
-
glittermonkey
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2658
- Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03
Re: glittermonkey
As i said, i don't have a particular problem with the guy, it's just the lack of respect he showed to one of the most respectful posters we have here. If it's true that he doesn't know where the temple is, then i'm not surprised that he struggles to understand the ratings formula.Wales wrote:glittermonkey - say hello to dan rose aka "mayorga is dangerous" or "still dangerous". absolute idiot that in one infamous post though the temple was at the centre of the head (rather than the side). Did frequent boxingtalk a while ago but moved on to be an arse somewhere else.