EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post Reply
oilup
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by oilup »

38 views, lol.

Nobody cares about this FNF farce.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by whicker »

Well, it could be a good fight. Who knows until it happens?

They have Sutherland on the undercard, and also Sykes V Crolla will be a good fight.

Rest of the undercard, not very sure about to be honest - nothing stands out at all.

Is this a dinner show? They offer boxing only £35, or boxing and dinner £75.
oilup
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by oilup »

whicker wrote:Well, it could be a good fight. Who knows until it happens?

They have Sutherland on the undercard, and also Sykes V Crolla will be a good fight.

Rest of the undercard, not very sure about to be honest - nothing stands out at all.

Is this a dinner show? They offer boxing only £35, or boxing and dinner £75.
Ah yes, Sutherland against another no hoper, really wets the appetite that.
Night-Nurse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 151
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:28

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by Night-Nurse »

Theres a good 6 rounder between Lee Selby and Samir Mounamire, dont think Smair really shown as a pro yet but this could bring out the best in him!
Should be an entertaining affair!
Londonirish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3064
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by Londonirish »

Ahmed, Lunnlatic :lol:

Going to be an easy fight for Edwars imo...
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6638
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by THEBUTCH »

Ahmed gave Edwards some torrid moments and that was on Ahmeds' debut and has improved since then, but so too has Edwards. It could well be competitive for 4 or 5 rounds, but you would then expect the vastly more seasoned Edwards to take over.

I'm sure this will be an improvement on Edwards-Bloy because Ahmed has got more fire in his belly and will keep trying even when the tank's empty.

No wonder this title fight is getting so much stick from the posters on here. Despite the lack of depth at 8st, Ahmed should have at least boxed for an Area, English title or eliminator first. He simply has no credentials to be boxing for a British title.
bombhead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 87
Joined: 06 Dec 2008, 08:12

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by bombhead »

I think Crolla v Sykes will be a quality fight, should be a good 50/50 scrap!
Night-Nurse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 151
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:28

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by Night-Nurse »

Agreed...Sykes been in top form in gym, best ive seen in last 2 years!
Reports are crolla has been the same....so im expecting fight of night!
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by TerribleTerry »

bombhead wrote:I think Crolla v Sykes will be a quality fight, should be a good 50/50 scrap!
Cracking fight - British boxing needs these sort of cross roads fights for young prospects. Looking forward to this more than the main event :TU:
Fearful_Freddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 887
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 23:36

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by Fearful_Freddie »

What language is Edwards speaking? I hardly understood any of that.
bombhead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 87
Joined: 06 Dec 2008, 08:12

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by bombhead »

TerribleTerry wrote:
bombhead wrote:I think Crolla v Sykes will be a quality fight, should be a good 50/50 scrap!
Cracking fight - British boxing needs these sort of cross roads fights for young prospects. Looking forward to this more than the main event :TU:
Will definetely be fight of the night, could be one of the domestic fights of the year. Really looking forward to this one!!
BigEars
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 994
Joined: 16 Jan 2006, 14:23

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by BigEars »

THEBUTCH wrote:No wonder this title fight is getting so much stick from the posters on here. Despite the lack of depth at 8st, Ahmed should have at least boxed for an Area, English title or eliminator first. He simply has no credentials to be boxing for a British title.
Especially so when you consider his win over Wilton was a gift !
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6638
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: EDWARDS V AHMED WEIGH IN FOOTAGE

Post by THEBUTCH »

Well, well.....Ahmed gave that a bloody good go. He couldn't have tried any harder.

I still say he didn't deserve his shot, but 10/10 for effort.
Post Reply