Better KO statistics than Shavers and McClellan

Post Reply
IronKidDynamite
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 109
Joined: 28 Jul 2004, 09:19

Better KO statistics than Shavers and McClellan

Post by IronKidDynamite »

I mean of overall career.

I think Earnie Shavers and Gerald McClellan.

Earnie Shavers was 67 KOs in 73 wins, I don't know how much first rund KOs he had(I wish Boxrec supplied this but I guess too much work) but it was a lot. That is a knockout percentage of 91.78%.

McClellan had 29 KOs in 31 wins, a huge percentage of 93.55%. He had 20 first round KOs, a fanstatic percentage of 68.97%. You may say it was because he had an early career but he actually knocked out better opposition than Shavers beat whether past their prime or not.

I think these two had the best KO statistics I've seen taking into account being good boxers or at least beating a name like Norton or Jackson.

Who had better statistics?
Lefthookhappy19
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 968
Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 19:15

Post by Lefthookhappy19 »

Alfonso Zamora Won 33 (KOs 32).
Carlos Zarate Won 66 (KOs 63).

Both World champs. Look up Wilfredo Gomez as well. Also Danny Lopez.
pringle
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 216
Joined: 19 Oct 2003, 20:30

Post by pringle »

tye fields and don steel.
overhand_right
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by overhand_right »

peter mcneeley
Post Reply