beagleboy wrote:If you believe that allegedly should have handed him his contract back, do you believe that twentysix, who is either Rhodes or connected to him, was wise to openly slag off FW on this Board ?
Sadly , no. The scales keep tipping the wrong way.
And what are your loyalties to Mr W arren - I do believe you work or have worked in boxing!!!
None - I haven't worked in boxing.
Again, your reluctant to answer the question.
If Rhodes was still under contract with allegedly, was it wise for twenty six to slag him off on this Board ?
If you're still afraid to answer, maybe Boxingchat can provide an answer.
beagleboy wrote:If you believe that allegedly should have handed him his contract back, do you believe that twentysix, who is either Rhodes or connected to him, was wise to openly slag off FW on this Board ?
Sadly , no. The scales keep tipping the wrong way.
And what are your loyalties to Mr W arren - I do believe you work or have worked in boxing!!!
None - I haven't worked in boxing.
Again, your reluctant to answer the question.
If Rhodes was still under contract with allegedly, was it wise for twenty six to slag him off on this Board ?
If you're still afraid to answer, maybe Boxingchat can provide an answer.
You are telling porkies Beagleboy!!!
And with regards to answering your question - please see my last 2 posts - I think it was 2 posts ago that I answered your question directly.
And with regards getting "Boxing Twat From Brentwood Who Crys When He Is Sacked" to answer your question - I welcome his mature , concise and utmost relevant answer!!! - so please when you threaten things like that - someone as thick skinned as myself is hardly going to quiver with fear!!!
I will repeat you are telling a couple of porkies - why do you have to use a similar screenname to a poster we have on here who was forced to change his name due to your actions - in addition if you do not work in boxing and have no association with the sport - how on earth do you get your information - or would you like someone on here to tell the forum exactly who you are - nope better still lets play the same games you are!!!
Beagleboy,
As nothing more than a fight fan, I am at liberty to express my views on this board in any manner I please, subject to the rules and regulations applied by the moderators.
However, I think that you have a distorted view of my opinions on Wazza.
I have been critical, that's a give, as have 99.9% of posters on here.
I haven't the time or the inclination, but I think you might struggle to find any outrageously derogatory comments.
In fact, I can openly say he remains the leading Promotor in the UK.
Whether his business tactics are those you would applaud is another matter.
As much as I detest how the Calzaghe affair has panned out, I have openly said that he, as an individual, cannot be held responsible.
Indeed some would consider your post as a threat suggesting that I suppress my views, because my friend is Co Managed by said person.
Your in depth knowledge and inside information is exemplory for a person not involved in boxing.
Yeah right.
Come out of the closet.
Everyone knows who I am - and you are ?
I'll not hold my breath.
Last edited by twenty six on 10 Jun 2009, 05:33, edited 1 time in total.
That's fair comment Eric.
However, you've only been back here for a few monthsand there are some posters intent on hiding behind their sign on, and causing maximum disruption.
ERIC GUY wrote:Stone me!!, this sounds like the crown courts!!
its Boxing lads!! stop bitching about each other
Eric
People have fun in different ways - you see there are a couple of us who have a very very good idea who Beagleboy is - and whilst your comment is relevant - its also good to have fun - take you for example - you like "baiting" the likes of me with your subtle little comments here and there and its all taken in the spirit its intended!!!
Beagleboy for sometime has had a lot of fun at people's expense on here and his comments like a lot of us come close to the bone on occasions - however unlike myself Beagleboy likes to hide behind his "name" thinking no one knows him when in reality he forgot to remember who he has told concerning his screen name on boxrec.
beagleboy wrote:Spud you did answer one question, but still haven't answered the last one so I'll repeat it :
If Rhodes was still managed by allegedly, was it wise for twenty six, who is clearly associated with him, to slag off allegedly on internet forums ?
Are you afraid to answer ?
Its a very nice try to deflect what is being said about you Beagleboy - however if you had bothered to read the thread you would have seen I answered your questions quite directly in a previous post:
Spud wrote:lol:
In answer to your very direct question concerning Ryan Rhodes and whether he has been badly advised.
First of all as "Twenty Six" and others on here will tell you - I thought it was unwise to leave "The Ingles" - however what some people on here do not realise is that "Boxing Politics" meant that I soon learnt that as long as Ryan Rhodes had a hole in his ars* he would not have stayed. With that said for me Brendan Ingle is the top trainer this country has produced and as such it was one of them situations of "being stuck between a rock and a hard place".
With regards to Ryan Rhodes and his subsequent career - I do not believe things have gone as well as expected. Somewhere along the line yep I think the wrong advice has been given - whilst it has been clearly explained to me why Konecy is going to be his next opponent - I disagree - however offers were made for other fighters and unrealistic purse demands have come back. Sometimes its not just about the money - if its the world title trail you really want and not the money - sometimes you have to take the risk - and I do not think Konecy is either a risk and despite his rankings I do not think beating him will carry any weight whatsoever - I hope I am proved wrong.
Do I think Hayemaker was the right move to Rhodes - absolutely - however with hindsight and the rumours concerning Setanta you could possibly argue - WRONG move!!! but from a promotional aspect - Absolutely!!! - what did Hennessy do for Rhodes? - what did SN do for Rhodes in the later part of his contract with them?
And whilst I am here - I am delighted to tell you I still do the odd few bits here and there for Dennis Hobson and only him - the Haye/Barrett fight was purely a one off and I thoroughly enjoyed working on that show - Haye/Booth and especially Dave C are good people and if people stopped and made their own minds up about them instead of listening to b*llocks - they would clearly see Hayemaker are a bloody good outfit - but quite simply Dennis Hobson has been far too good to me for me to upsticks and go elsewhere!!!
Anyhow you have failed to answer one of my questions - have you lost that weight yet?
I do note Beagleboy you are still ignoring everything that has been stated about you - I will state you here and now - I thought you were quite a proud chap and would not shy away from who you are and what you believe in - yet you do not have the balls or the spine to state truthfully who you are and where you are from - you also fail to acknowledge you made the mistake of once stating you would wind up the once named "Beagleboys" by naming yourself by a similar name!!! - UMmmmmm - I expect your immediate denial!!!
Threads like these are the result of having Spud on the board.
There is a reason he was banned from every british board he has ever posted on. The threads turn into these types of personal tit for tat rubbish that nobody wants to read. Absolute drivel. Not to mention his constant, "i-know-something-you-dont" attitude.
He should be given a warning for getting personal in his threads in my opinion.
briantracy09 wrote:Threads like these are the result of having Spud on the board.
There is a reason he was banned from every british board he has ever posted on. The threads turn into these types of personal tit for tat rubbish that nobody wants to read. Absolute drivel. Not to mention his constant, "i-know-something-you-dont" attitude.
He should be given a warning for getting personal in his threads in my opinion.
Brian - your post is noted and your longevity on this forum and the huge amount of posts you have made - I am sure makes you qualified to really speak up for your fellow boxrec posters!!!
Forums - are about attitudes and differences of opinions - its what makes forums tick - if you do not like the thread then why visit it? - why not start off some threads of interest to yourself and that the rest of the forum can join in with active and interesting discussion - let me have a trawl to see what threads you have started to make you so qualified with your expert knowledge concerning all of the forums.
UMmmmmm - looked at when you joined - I wonder who you are!!
briantracy09 wrote:Threads like these are the result of having Spud on the board.
There is a reason he was banned from every british board he has ever posted on. The threads turn into these types of personal tit for tat rubbish that nobody wants to read. Absolute drivel. Not to mention his constant, "i-know-something-you-dont" attitude.
He should be given a warning for getting personal in his threads in my opinion.
Brian - your post is noted and your longevity on this forum and the huge amount of posts you have made - I am sure makes you qualified to really speak up for your fellow boxrec posters!!!
Forums - are about attitudes and differences of opinions - its what makes forums tick - if you do not like the thread then why visit it? - why not start off some threads of interest to yourself and that the rest of the forum can join in with active and interesting discussion - let me have a trawl to see what threads you have started to make you so qualified with your expert knowledge concerning all of the forums.
UMmmmmm - looked at when you joined - I wonder who you are!!
Your ignorant spud......
You could at least of answered my pm. Say's an awful lot about you does that.
ERIC GUY wrote:Stone me!!, this sounds like the crown courts!!
its Boxing lads!! stop bitching about each other
Eric
People have fun in different ways - you see there are a couple of us who have a very very good idea who Beagleboy is - and whilst your comment is relevant - its also good to have fun - take you for example - you like "baiting" the likes of me with your subtle little comments here and there and its all taken in the spirit its intended!!!
Beagleboy for sometime has had a lot of fun at people's expense on here and his comments like a lot of us come close to the bone on occasions - however unlike myself Beagleboy likes to hide behind his "name" thinking no one knows him when in reality he forgot to remember who he has told concerning his screen name on boxrec.
Carry on the banter Eric!!!
well just name him then, much easier... why do you keep adding these icons at the end of your posts?
Unfortunately Albert aka Spud, will continue to get personal with people in threads and act the big shot by mentioning that he knows x person and spoke to y person about the latest news etc. But he can't tell us what x or y person said... i-know-something-you-dont attitude. His CV is littered with bannings from past forums (ESB, Btalk, Doghouse etc) and he has banned half of this board from esb before. he has switched allegiance regularly every time he changed companies (worked for hennessy, worked for hobson) his attitude on Hatton took a complete 180 respectively, to mention just one instance of his sh*te.
People know what this clown is about, but it's good to highlight it regularly and I will continue to do so.
No doubt he will now cry to the mods and try to get me banned for insulting his family, which of course never happened. Unfortunately the mods put up with Albert for now, but I can't wait to see him removed from the forum, which is just a matter of time.
briantracey09, Livra, Search, etc etc etc - signs of a desperate man !!! - you have been banned a number of times - lets see how long you last this time.
Quixall - I have not answered your PM because I do not wish to - it is you who is being nosey and asking questions which have no relevance or business of yours!!! - why are you so desperate to know who beagleboy is?
Eric Guy - I have not named Beagleboy for 2 reasons - firstly the man has been insulting and had fun at the expense of a number of posters on this forum - its called a bit of his own medicine back - however knowing the man he will be enjoying this. Secondly under the Data Protection Act I am not allowed to name him - got warned about that from a poster who knows his stuff!!! - seriously - politcally correct gone mad world and all that but hey he aint nobbling me!!
I take the point Eric and this will be my last post on this particular thread - its served its purpose!!! (Another smiley for you!! )
Spud wrote:briantracey09, Livra, Search, etc etc etc - signs of a desperate man !!! - you have been banned a number of times - lets see how long you last this time.
Quixall - I have not answered your PM because I do not wish to - it is you who is being nosey and asking questions which have no relevance or business of yours!!! - why are you so desperate to know who beagleboy is?
Eric Guy - I have not named Beagleboy for 2 reasons - firstly the man has been insulting and had fun at the expense of a number of posters on this forum - its called a bit of his own medicine back - however knowing the man he will be enjoying this. Secondly under the Data Protection Act I am not allowed to name him - got warned about that from a poster who knows his stuff!!! - seriously - politcally correct gone mad world and all that but hey he aint nobbling me!!
I take the point Eric and this will be my last post on this particular thread - its served its purpose!!! (Another smiley for you!! )
Then have the decency to explain that by PM......
I was'nt being nosey at all and you sound as if you think your Mr it in boxing
briantracy09 wrote:Unfortunately Albert aka Spud, will continue to get personal with people in threads and act the big shot by mentioning that he knows x person and spoke to y person about the latest news etc. But he can't tell us what x or y person said... i-know-something-you-dont attitude. His CV is littered with bannings from past forums (ESB, Btalk, Doghouse etc) and he has banned half of this board from esb before. he has switched allegiance regularly every time he changed companies (worked for hennessy, worked for hobson) his attitude on Hatton took a complete 180 respectively, to mention just one instance of his sh*te.
People know what this clown is about, but it's good to highlight it regularly and I will continue to do so.
No doubt he will now cry to the mods and try to get me banned for insulting his family, which of course never happened. Unfortunately the mods put up with Albert for now, but I can't wait to see him removed from the forum, which is just a matter of time.
You have just answered a question for me Brian...........Thanks a lot
(Another smiley for you!! )
