Call me wacko but I still think Duran took this fight to make up for quitting against Leonard (and to get well-paid in the process in his last fight). He fell on his shield and could roam the streets of Panama without "quitter" mutters from every doorway, even after Moore and Hagler. He looked terrible - unbalanced, wide open - just terrible. Look how low his hands are at the final right hand. It is almost like he's thinking, "Come on Tommy, get it over with." He literally drops themRandyman wrote:Rog, this fight has always been painful for me to watch. This and Duran v Leonard II are difficult for me. Hearns was at the top of his game that night. This is the fight that convinced Hearns and his people that they could beat Marvin Hagler and maybe on another night he might have beaten him but on the night they fought, Hagler was too much for Hearns plus he was spurred on by the cut. he was afraid the fight might be stopped and it might have. He took matters into his own hands and gave us a classic, both of them did.
Even with his losses and the flaws in his career Roberto Duran is my favorite fighter. Leonard, Hagler and Hearns got him past his best. Duran, a natural lightweight took on the Welters and Middleweights and did pretty damned good all things considered. As far as I'm concerned he's right there with Robinson as the greatest fighter that ever lived. As a lightweight maybe he was the very best. As good as Manny Paquiao seems to be, there is no Leonard, Hagler or Hearns on his resume or in his future. Duran was special.
Randy
One thing is for sure, Duran had already made his mind up to retire, lose or lose. Duran genuinely quit after this (in 1984) and only came back in 1986 because Felicidad had spent all his money.









