Autobarn wrote:I'm a bit mixed with even rounds.
It seems well out of order to have lots of even rounds.
It isn't that hard to "split" the work and decide who did better.
In a 12 round fight, I don't mind one even round, because 2 evenly matched fighters could win 6 rds each and have a tie. If one round is too hard to seperrate them, one guy ends up winning by, say, 6-5-1 in rounds and you have a winner.
overhand_right wrote:10-10 rds should never be used.
Someone has always done something better or more eye catching in a rd, two boxers have never boxed exactly equal.
I like the fact Vegas judges dont score even rds & intend to find a winner.
disagree! say you have a 'feeling out' opening round, where neither guy does or lands anything substantial, I'd say thats a 10-10 whereas others would 'split' them and award a 10-9.
Then compare that to ooh something like round 5 of Lewis/Holyfield, where LL clearly put some hurt on Evander, controlled the round, etc, but
didn't score a KD. Now, that would also be a 10-9. In my book,
that's out of order, scoring those rounds the same. But, each to their own eh! There's plenty of room for improv when it comes to scoring fights!
ps. speaking of LL/EH, didn't eugenia williams give that round 5 to Holyfield?!? hehe, now
thats dodgy scoring !