The Greed Of Sky

Poncey · Post by **Poncey** » 28 Jun 2009, 05:19

Anyone else noticed that SSNews is now an extra £1 with the fall of Setanta News?

I congratulated them by cancelling the sports channels package and told them to fornicate off.

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 28 Jun 2009, 05:31

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Anyone else noticed that SSNews is now an extra £1 with the fall of Setanta News?

I congratulated them by cancelling the sports channels package and told them to eff off.

Not very subtle are they? Well done sir.

Rickby · Post by **Rickby** » 28 Jun 2009, 09:54

If you are in the UK, get a Freeview box, where it is free to air.

housesecond · Post by **housesecond** » 28 Jun 2009, 10:35

Rickby wrote:If you are in the UK, get a Freeview box, where it is free to air.

It aint free to air on my sky+ box since I cancelled sky sports. It is free upstairs though on my old ON Digital box.

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 28 Jun 2009, 10:37

Sky viewers have to pay for a news channel??

alexpaterson · Post by **alexpaterson** » 28 Jun 2009, 10:54

I like Sky Sports News you dont have to pay for it but i think Setanta news had the better presenters imo

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 28 Jun 2009, 12:10

I didn't realise this. I could see why Sky might charge on Freeview - to encourage people to go Satelite... but on Sky?

Dioufy · Post by **Dioufy** » 28 Jun 2009, 12:15

Cancelled yesterday. I judge myself for staying with them for so long. Tossers.

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 28 Jun 2009, 12:34

How does it work? Do you need a seperate subscriptions JUST for Sky Sports news? That sounds odd. I would assume it comes free with the sports channels.

chrisfinch · Post by **chrisfinch** » 28 Jun 2009, 14:22

whicker wrote:How does it work? Do you need a seperate subscriptions JUST for Sky Sports news? That sounds odd. I would assume it comes free with the sports channels.

No, its part of the "News and Events mix" which contains such channels as Eurosport, Eurosport 2, CNN, Sky News, SSN etc. and now ESPN America.

Spud · Post by **Spud** » 28 Jun 2009, 14:32

I was on about this to the Missus - Te more I think about all of this with Setanta and ITV bowing out the more I am thinking I will not be held to ransom by Sky TV.

Really do not know what I am going to do!!

Is cancelling the solution?

cutting the nose to spite the face springs to mind when you are sports nutcases!!!

UMmmmmmm - dilemna time!!!

Hardhitters11 · Post by **Hardhitters11** » 28 Jun 2009, 14:36

I will be cancelling my subscription in the next few day's without doubt they are piss taking B'stard's!

Spud · Post by **Spud** » 28 Jun 2009, 17:18

Hardhitters11 wrote:I will be cancelling my subscription in the next few day's without doubt they are piss taking B'stard's!

Lets be serious here - a lot of us are sports junkies if that is the right phrase - by cancelling Sky although that seems to be the right thing to do - as already mentioned isn't cutting the nose to spite the face type of situation??

DaveyH · Post by **DaveyH** » 28 Jun 2009, 20:49

Spud wrote:I was on about this to the Missus - Te more I think about all of this with Setanta and ITV bowing out the more I am thinking I will not be held to ransom by Sky TV.

Really do not know what I am going to do!!

Is cancelling the solution?

cutting the nose to spite the face springs to mind when you are sports nutcases!!!

UMmmmmmm - dilemna time!!!

The only real solution to this dilemma is attend every single boxing event live!

brian13 · Post by **brian13** » 28 Jun 2009, 21:57

Setanta news was pritty poor [apart from Buncey's boxing hour] because they got fans involved at stupid times for stupid events. They f**ked up an interview very badly because they gave fans too much of a voice.

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 28 Jun 2009, 23:54

i pay my 30-40 pound a month & i watch only sports,some of the rubbish ive saw i'd prefer to keep my money because all the decent stuff is ppv.

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 29 Jun 2009, 00:48

I still think it's crazy that they only sell PPV to people who have already subscribed to SKY. Seems more logical to have it as a stand-alone event.

DavidPayne · Post by **DavidPayne** » 29 Jun 2009, 04:26

Spud wrote:I was on about this to the Missus - Te more I think about all of this with Setanta and ITV bowing out the more I am thinking I will not be held to ransom by Sky TV.

Really do not know what I am going to do!!

Is cancelling the solution?

cutting the nose to spite the face springs to mind when you are sports nutcases!!!

UMmmmmmm - dilemna time!!! :o

Nothing to do with the laughlingly termed "Entertainers" now not being in the promised land?

Who is their manager anyway? Is it Chris Hughton again or Joe Kinnear's nurse?

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 29 Jun 2009, 05:09

Think I will cancel sky sports. You can always resubscribe if there's a fight you really want to watch.

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 29 Jun 2009, 05:13

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Think I will cancel sky sports. You can always resubscribe if there's a fight you really want to watch.

Can you do that, or are there cancellation fees/joining up fees etc?

Seems a pretty clever way to do it!

That said, it's so rare anything worthwhile is on anyway, and if it is there are alwyas pubs, other people's houses etc.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 29 Jun 2009, 05:26

whicker wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Think I will cancel sky sports. You can always resubscribe if there's a fight you really want to watch.
Can you do that, or are there cancellation fees/joining up fees etc?

Seems a pretty clever way to do it!

That said, it's so rare anything worthwhile is on anyway, and if it is there are alwyas pubs, other people's houses etc.

You can just phone up and subscribe at any time. They will charge you for one month at that point, but you can cancel it again.

Think that's what I'll do.

DavidPayne · Post by **DavidPayne** » 29 Jun 2009, 05:58

I hate Sky.

Especially the scotch twat on the SSN channel. Jim White - £150,000 a year to pay this shit house to be smug.

"We cross now to our reporter outside Anfied, tell me Tony, any sign of a new signing today?"

"No [wrapped up in 8 minutes of bluff]"

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_q ... n16514633/

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 29 Jun 2009, 07:23

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
whicker wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Think I will cancel sky sports. You can always resubscribe if there's a fight you really want to watch.
Can you do that, or are there cancellation fees/joining up fees etc?

Seems a pretty clever way to do it!

That said, it's so rare anything worthwhile is on anyway, and if it is there are alwyas pubs, other people's houses etc.
You can just phone up and subscribe at any time. They will charge you for one month at that point, but you can cancel it again.

Think that's what I'll do.

I see- so basically, you buy it and cancel right away, and still get your viewing for that full month?

DavidPayne · Post by **DavidPayne** » 29 Jun 2009, 07:36

Did I mention I hate Sky?

I do.

Its like having a direct debit with a perma-tanned Satan.

lirva · Post by **lirva** » 29 Jun 2009, 07:40

I think when any company holds a monopoly of the market, its bad for the audiences. Sky used to put on outstanding shows 5-10 years ago. Their coverage is good when they do cover a fight, although their hyping of fighters can be nauseus. However they just don't cover enough fights. Its sickening but thats not going to change imo.

The Greed Of Sky

The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky

Re: The Greed Of Sky