What about this for a charmless feckker?
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
thank you for showing me this contribution to the literature of boxing
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
He somehow tries to prove boxings demise by the reaction of the media to Gattis death, basically the journo is a bell endDavidPayne wrote:http://www.metro.us/us/article/2009/07/ ... /index.xml
I'm not sure whether to write to him or not.
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
fool, its this kind of thing that makes people think "no-one cares about boxing then why should i"If Mike Tyson’s not involved, boxing stories have no pulse — even when death is in the room. The biggest boxing story this year might just be Iron Mike’s cameo in “The Hangover.”
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
here we go.
can we have boxrec.com/qualifiers - where a panel of judges, in a Dragons Den format, can approve topic titles before they're posted.
The judges can select and appoint themselves as the protectors of the boxrec community at large.
can we have boxrec.com/qualifiers - where a panel of judges, in a Dragons Den format, can approve topic titles before they're posted.
The judges can select and appoint themselves as the protectors of the boxrec community at large.
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
"boxing has no pulse, even when there is death in the room"
where the eff did they get this buffoon?
where the eff did they get this buffoon?
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
Chris Baldwin is obviously a bit stupid. Let's just leave him alone in the corner nibbling on Boxing Magazine.
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
I don't like it. I'm out.DavidPayne wrote:here we go.
can we have boxrec.com/qualifiers - where a panel of judges, in a Dragons Den format, can approve topic titles before they're posted.
The judges can select and appoint themselves as the protectors of the boxrec community at large.
-
Punchy Joe
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 319
- Joined: 25 Feb 2007, 10:17
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
And that's journalism...............F*ck me
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
The guy who wrote that is an idiot. Gatti is legend to boxing fans, but not the the mass public thats why it didnt make big news. That fools trying to say boxing is nothing compared to golf because if tiger woods had been murdered it would have been front page news.
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
If nothing else the journalist should hang his head in shame to mock a sport on the back of someones death - it really is a disgusting report - and entices me to dislike journalists even more than usual!!!
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
He must have gone to the Kelvin Mckenzie school of journalism, chat a load of bollocks to get your name known.
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
Well, he's right in a horribly blunt way. Boxing is a minority sport and barely draws a line in the quality papers. Gatti's death, Arguello's death - not a line. Did Walter Dipley shoot Ketchel in the back? Oh yes.
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
Why bother? He is the one who is irrelevant.DavidPayne wrote:http://www.metro.us/us/article/2009/07/ ... /index.xml
I'm not sure whether to write to him or not.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
Didn't Arguello make the obituaries in broadsheets?bennie wrote:Well, he's right in a horribly blunt way. Boxing is a minority sport and barely draws a line in the quality papers. Gatti's death, Arguello's death - not a line. Did Walter Dipley shoot Ketchel in the back? Oh yes.
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
One sincerely hopes so, but Gatti is the one. Man, a famous fighter, one of the bravest, strongest, wildest, craziest, most exciting fighters the game has ever seen, strangled to death (allegedly) by his wife's bloody purse straps, a sexy former stripper! This is a big story (to the red top newspapers).DavidPayne wrote:Didn't Arguello make the obituaries in broadsheets?bennie wrote:Well, he's right in a horribly blunt way. Boxing is a minority sport and barely draws a line in the quality papers. Gatti's death, Arguello's death - not a line. Did Walter Dipley shoot Ketchel in the back? Oh yes.
Instead, we hear about Flintoff's dicky knee.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
Bennie, please. This is non-boxing. Since when has murder and strippers had a place on this forum?bennie wrote:One sincerely hopes so, but Gatti is the one. Man, a famous fighter, one of the bravest, strongest, wildest, craziest, most exciting fighters the game has ever seen, strangled to death (allegedly) by his wife's bloody purse straps, a sexy former stripper! This is a big story (to the red top newspapers).DavidPayne wrote:Didn't Arguello make the obituaries in broadsheets?bennie wrote:Well, he's right in a horribly blunt way. Boxing is a minority sport and barely draws a line in the quality papers. Gatti's death, Arguello's death - not a line. Did Walter Dipley shoot Ketchel in the back? Oh yes.
Instead, we hear about Flintoff's dicky knee.
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
I DID mention red tops, son. You a proofreader, an' all.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
Yes, but THIS is a boxing forum.
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
gatti was a boxer, so its boxing related!!!
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
Since i started posting?bennie wrote:Bennie, please. This is non-boxing. Since when has murder and strippers had a place on this forum?DavidPayne wrote:One sincerely hopes so, but Gatti is the one. Man, a famous fighter, one of the bravest, strongest, wildest, craziest, most exciting fighters the game has ever seen, strangled to death (allegedly) by his wife's bloody purse straps, a sexy former stripper! This is a big story (to the red top newspapers).bennie wrote:Well, he's right in a horribly blunt way. Boxing is a minority sport and barely draws a line in the quality papers. Gatti's death, Arguello's death - not a line. Did Walter Dipley shoot Ketchel in the back? Oh yes
Didn't Arguello make the obituaries in broadsheets?
Instead, we hear about Flintoff's dicky knee.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
As is Kevin Mitchell. The point is Bennie complained that there was a thread about Mitchell being done for drink-driving, saying it was "non-boxing".ERIC GUY wrote:gatti was a boxer, so its boxing related!!!
-
Wake up call
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1178
- Joined: 10 Feb 2008, 11:10
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
Did any one else notice the disclaimer?
Metro does not endorse the views of its authors or opinions expressed on its pages
What a cop out.
Metro does not endorse the views of its authors or opinions expressed on its pages
What a cop out.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: What about this for a charmless feckker?
I'm going to write to the pompus pudendum, I hate these type of 'journalists'DavidPayne wrote:http://www.metro.us/us/article/2009/07/ ... /index.xml
I'm not sure whether to write to him or not.
No style, no substance.......bloated waffle and misdirected attitude