The WBU scandal - no mandatory's
The WBU scandal - no mandatory's
dr_hook posted something I didn't know after the proposed Ricky Hatton-Vivian Harris fight fell through last month. He wrote:
"allegedly is scared he will lose on purse bids to other promoters that will force Hatton to fight in another country. That’s why the WBU title exists. There are no mandatory fights and you can fight any bums. Hatton never defended the British title because when he was the champ Junior Witter was the mandatory fighter for the title. Hatton also never fought for the European title because Warren would of lost the purse to Urkal handlers."
It was a post that got me thinking, especially about the WBU. If there are no mandatory's, then a champion, as dr_hook says, can pick ANYONE in the top 10 or the top 15 every time he fights. That has to be a bit of a scandal.
"allegedly is scared he will lose on purse bids to other promoters that will force Hatton to fight in another country. That’s why the WBU title exists. There are no mandatory fights and you can fight any bums. Hatton never defended the British title because when he was the champ Junior Witter was the mandatory fighter for the title. Hatton also never fought for the European title because Warren would of lost the purse to Urkal handlers."
It was a post that got me thinking, especially about the WBU. If there are no mandatory's, then a champion, as dr_hook says, can pick ANYONE in the top 10 or the top 15 every time he fights. That has to be a bit of a scandal.
Last edited by bennie on 13 Sep 2004, 11:34, edited 2 times in total.
-
glittermonkey
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2658
- Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03
-
My T Sharp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32
This is spot on. This rubbish is extracted from the WBU website.
"Since its formation, the WBU has attempted to change and clarify a few of the outdated rules and operating procedures in the world of professional boxing. It has not been our policy to impose mandatory defences, unless the WBU champion attempts to avoid the leading contenders in his particular weight division. We at the WBU have implemented a computerised Ratings Guide, a fighter’s position within this system is based solely upon the individual’s record and ability. The only way for any fighter to improve his position is to defeat an opponent above him. Therefore, no fighter can be moved up the rankings or into the ‘top ten’ by any means other than his own achievements in the ring. This is the only criteria by which a fighter can be granted a world title challenge."
http://www.wbu.cc/history.asp
The website is a joke. It has more stuff about Sports Network fighters on its homepage than the allegedly site does.
"Since its formation, the WBU has attempted to change and clarify a few of the outdated rules and operating procedures in the world of professional boxing. It has not been our policy to impose mandatory defences, unless the WBU champion attempts to avoid the leading contenders in his particular weight division. We at the WBU have implemented a computerised Ratings Guide, a fighter’s position within this system is based solely upon the individual’s record and ability. The only way for any fighter to improve his position is to defeat an opponent above him. Therefore, no fighter can be moved up the rankings or into the ‘top ten’ by any means other than his own achievements in the ring. This is the only criteria by which a fighter can be granted a world title challenge."
http://www.wbu.cc/history.asp
The website is a joke. It has more stuff about Sports Network fighters on its homepage than the allegedly site does.
This computerised ratings system they boast about is a bit of a mystery. Nothing but top 10 listings on the site. Have just emailed them enquiring as to where Mike Stewart is ranked with them...My T Sharp wrote:This is spot on. This rubbish is extracted from the WBU website.
"Since its formation, the WBU has attempted to change and clarify a few of the outdated rules and operating procedures in the world of professional boxing. It has not been our policy to impose mandatory defences, unless the WBU champion attempts to avoid the leading contenders in his particular weight division. We at the WBU have implemented a computerised Ratings Guide, a fighter’s position within this system is based solely upon the individual’s record and ability. The only way for any fighter to improve his position is to defeat an opponent above him. Therefore, no fighter can be moved up the rankings or into the ‘top ten’ by any means other than his own achievements in the ring. This is the only criteria by which a fighter can be granted a world title challenge."
http://www.wbu.cc/history.asp
The website is a joke. It has more stuff about Sports Network fighters on its homepage than the allegedly site does.
-
My T Sharp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32
