Macklin vs Barker off?

EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by EddieShredder »

:witzend:

Was looking forward to going to this one :verysad:
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by Dioufy »

:oo
ciscokid
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 286
Joined: 28 Dec 2002, 03:00

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by ciscokid »

BIGMARK wrote:i just read on another site that Macklin will be fighting a Finnish fighter called Asaikinen on sept 12th. does this mean the Barker fight is off? there was no link so how true it is i do know? plus boxrec still has Macklin-Barker listed for September.
If this is true he could have his hands full - Asaikinen is a good boxer - he won the European off Sylvester and then lost it again to him by a silly mistake - think I've seen 3 or 4 of his fights and he's not bad - he wont be a walk in the park by any means.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Dioufy wrote::oo
x2 :oo
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by gobbles »

If it is true it is an early black mark for Hatton promotions.

Instead of a genuine top British clash which would create a lot of interest at a top venue like Ally Pally on a Saturday night (for which Macklin would have earned £60K, they are trying to get him a Euro title fight which will have zero interest and be late on a Friday night in Manchester.

So much for them being different.
Rocky Balboa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1851
Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 16:38

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by Rocky Balboa »

Another one bites the dust! :(
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by Lenny »

Shame, especially as Asaikinen is going to be every bit as tough as Barker if not more so. We as fans just miss out on a big domestic tussle
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by twenty six »

Ricky lost the purse bids here to a massive offer from Meaty Mick.
He is very fortunate that he has a good deal with Sky - unlike some of our other Promotors.
However that does bring pressure to a fledgling Promotion Company in that he has to fill those dates, and provide a decent bill header.
Macklin clearly fits the bill, but the loss of that purse bid will have caused problems.
If this rumour is true, I can only think it's because Hatton Promotions desperately need him on their bill.
The opponent isn't the Euro Champ so unless there's been any movements in the background, a title won't be at stake.
Again the paying punter misses out on a top domestic match up due to Promotional issues.
Some things never change.
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2036
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by GlobalBox »

twenty six wrote:Ricky lost the purse bids here to a massive offer from Meaty Mick.
He is very fortunate that he has a good deal with Sky - unlike some of our other Promotors.
However that does bring pressure to a fledgling Promotion Company in that he has to fill those dates, and provide a decent bill header.
Macklin clearly fits the bill, but the loss of that purse bid will have caused problems.
If this rumour is true, I can only think it's because Hatton Promotions desperately need him on their bill.
The opponent isn't the Euro Champ so unless there's been any movements in the background, a title won't be at stake.
Again the paying punter misses out on a top domestic match up due to Promotional issues.
Some things never change.
Don't know if its true or not but the silence is deafening so you have to assume there may be something in it

The Euro title is vacant as Gevor gave it up to fight for a world title recently against Sturm.

Asikainen is official challenger with Sylvester, that can't take place because Sylvester has a world title shot in September.

Then you go to Pirog who is available but it makes you wonder if they have something lined up for him. Then its Oral, Spada and Zbik who all fought recently so they are out for a quick return to the ring.

Then its Macklin and Barker so its possible Macklin could be the highest ranked available challenger to the Finn for the vacant title, assuming Pirog is moving onto better things.

Hopefully someone can clear this up today from Hennessy as they come on here frequently.

Shame if its off but I suppose to be fair who would turn down a shot at the Euro crown, especially in a fight that Macklin wins as long as he keeps to a gameplan as the Finn can bang but is on the slide.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by Autobarn »

thought it was pirog v asikainen for vacant euro title
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by Autobarn »

Lenny wrote:Shame, especially as Asaikinen is going to be every bit as tough as Barker if not more so. We as fans just miss out on a big domestic tussle
asikainen just fell to pieces in his last fight, vs gevor. he might be done.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by Autobarn »

gobbles wrote:If it is true it is an early black mark for Hatton promotions.

Instead of a genuine top British clash which would create a lot of interest at a top venue like Ally Pally on a Saturday night (for which Macklin would have earned £60K, they are trying to get him a Euro title fight which will have zero interest and be late on a Friday night in Manchester.

So much for them being different.
it is moving him up from the british scene, though. win big at british level, EBU ramifications. win big at euro level, roll on world...abraham's title is vacated, pavlik will likely dump WBO strap and besided may move up to 168 by next year.
chris s
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 02 Jun 2004, 08:56

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by chris s »

gobbles wrote:If it is true it is an early black mark for Hatton promotions.

Instead of a genuine top British clash which would create a lot of interest at a top venue like Ally Pally on a Saturday night (for which Macklin would have earned £60K, they are trying to get him a Euro title fight which will have zero interest and be late on a Friday night in Manchester.

So much for them being different.
Got to agree with you there mate. Barker-Macklin means something

It smacks of we can't promote it so we'll go elsewhere. Hatton Promotions must have been serious about Barker-Macklin or they wouldn't have bid for it.

If Macklin is not going to face Barker and is still getting £60,000 to fight a MOR Finn from Hatton Promotions then good luck to him, but avoiding Barker is not great for domestic boxing
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by slapbangwhallop »

IMO its a bigger and better fight for Macklin
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by twenty six »

Globalbox,
Thanks for that, and it seems you've hit the nail on the head.
It's gonna be the Finn for the Euro.
nicolas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 12:26

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by nicolas »

Barker would have embarrased him anyway, Macklins running and i dont blame him.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by alexpaterson »

Shame this had all the makings of a very good fight hope it happens some time in the future I would still see Barker winning classier fighter and great straight punches
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by twenty six »

You can't say Macklin's running mate.
Boxing is a business as well as a sport.
This is nothing to do with the fighters, ALL to do with Promotors.
REAL_DEAL
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5030
Joined: 09 Jul 2003, 06:42

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by REAL_DEAL »

Win or lose Macklin will still be facing barker eventually. Just a shame it isn't happening in September. Hopefully Barker gets a name in his next fight, maybe a ex Abraham/sturm opponent
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by slapbangwhallop »

nicolas wrote:Barker would have embarrased him anyway, Macklins running and i dont blame him.
bollocks!

Amin is a strong, more experienced and higher ranked fighter than Baker! Hardly the actions of a coward!
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by THEBUTCH »

It might be a bit too soon to start laying into Macklin, anything might happen by the end of the year, but i've had my doubts about Macklin's willingness to face Barker in what would be a top rank British title fight. If Macklin does go elsewhere he should expect plenty of stick.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by sweetscience »

i take it Macklin has to vacate the British title then ?
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by Poncey »

Terry D wrote:
Anyway, the last one to call Macklin a 'coward' is gay.
Is the last one to call him a gay is a coward?
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

shame this has gone west.

another example of promoters not getting together. :roll:
gemmell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 16:12

Re: Macklin vs Barker off?

Post by gemmell »

nicolas wrote:Barker would have embarrased him anyway, Macklins running and i dont blame him.
yes barker is too slick..he is a quality boxer with underestimated power..i see darren going all the way..macklin will become european champ but is not world class
Post Reply