new Sky line up, rumours???
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: new Sky line up, rumours???
Thats just SKY being SKY. Fkking useless.
PPV...
... is it safe to assume that all of the big fights will cost us (or you as I never pay for B/O) £15 big ones?
Mayweather
Pacquiao
Hatton - if he returns
Haye
Khan - perhaps four a year :surprised:
If those fighters fight twice a year, then that's ten PPV's.
One or two a year I can deal with.
But ten?
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Mayweather
Pacquiao
Hatton - if he returns
Haye
Khan - perhaps four a year :surprised:
If those fighters fight twice a year, then that's ten PPV's.
One or two a year I can deal with.
But ten?
Re: PPV...
America has had to do it for years. We've been lucky it hasn't happened sooner.
Re: PPV...
Fecking Yanks. Always setting precedents.
Re: PPV...
Sky have been charging wrestling on ppv for years. The undercard better be good.
Re: PPV...
To me, that's like ITV charging you to watch Coronation Street.leforge wrote:Sky have been charging wrestling on ppv for years.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: PPV...
I'd pay to watch ken barlow kick off again some of his scraps were right thrillers,yes £15 pound to see the 'Weatherfield whirlwind' is a bargainDioufy wrote:To me, that's like ITV charging you to watch Coronation Street.leforge wrote:Sky have been charging wrestling on ppv for years.
D
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: PPV...
if Khan v Hatton is made i expect it will cost more than £15
Re: PPV...
Isn't it only marquee events that they charge (Mania, Rumble, Summerslam)?Dioufy wrote:To me, that's like ITV charging you to watch Coronation Street.leforge wrote:Sky have been charging wrestling on ppv for years.
D