Lenny,
Surely this will have to be for the British title ?
Macklin will vacate if he's got his EBU chance.
Whoever is in the other corner, looks like an easy night's work for Barker, and the title to boot.
Macklin vs Barker off?
Re: Macklin vs Barker off?
They do communicate I think.Spud wrote:![]()
![]()
If Hennessy works with W arren - I am the most handsome man in the world and my head looking like a Spud is in everyones imagination!!!
FFS - it just aint going to happen!!!
They both decided to suspend bids for O'Donnell v Brook the other day and Barker fought against the kid from the midlands who Dean Powell handles but is Warren promoted without going to offers. They were also trying to make Macklin against Thirlwall before Macklin left FW
Re: Macklin vs Barker off?
yeah there was potentially macklin v facey 2, thirwall, a bigger name who fought someone else instead, and now asikainen. that's a lot of names given that he was definitely fighting barker to defend the british title. ah'll say no moo-er
Re: Macklin vs Barker off?
i'd say gevor is a bit dangerous given that he nearly beat sturm (some would say he did). gevor will surely be looking for a 3rd world title shot.Lenny wrote:So who do people think Barker should fight next if this is all correct? Not too much about domestically for him without dropping down a level, Murray probably isn't ready, Smith has moved up, Elcock lost to Macklin and he's already beaten McDermott and Bendall. Wouldn't mind Quigley dropping down to middle and that fight happening although I know this isn't likely.
How about someone like Gevor who beat Asikainen? How good is Geale? That would be a top class commonwealth title fight. Or is Barker in no way ready for guys like this and my head is in the clouds?
Think they may look to a past it name, like Jantuah who has been linked in the past.
and I love the Mick and Frank coalition idea. That would make a great sitcom. They could share a bed like Ernie and Eric???
i think geale is very promising. he did very well vs a bigger man, mundine, in a superb fight. he puts on good, varied pressure, a very technically aware fighter even if he doesn't look particularly slick, can keep a good pace for 12 rds though he's been down a few times. not sure if geale would want a commonwealth title. i think geale will be looking to the world scene. he really raised himself in defeat to the much more experienced mundine.
Re: Macklin vs Barker off?
I would love to see Barker vs Geale. 
Re: Macklin vs Barker off?
Barker vs McEwan?
-
scrap iron
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 407
- Joined: 02 Jan 2007, 17:38
Re: Macklin vs Barker off?
Presuming the fight will now be for the vacant British title and would think Matthew Thirwall would be a big favourite to take the job seeing how they both have the same promoter.Lenny wrote:So who do people think Barker should fight next if this is all correct? Not too much about domestically for him without dropping down a level, Murray probably isn't ready, Smith has moved up, Elcock lost to Macklin and he's already beaten McDermott and Bendall. Wouldn't mind Quigley dropping down to middle and that fight happening although I know this isn't likely.
How about someone like Gevor who beat Asikainen? How good is Geale? That would be a top class commonwealth title fight. Or is Barker in no way ready for guys like this and my head is in the clouds?
Think they may look to a past it name, like Jantuah who has been linked in the past.
and I love the Mick and Frank coalition idea. That would make a great sitcom. They could share a bed like Ernie and Eric???
However, now that John Duddy has been beaten and his market value has gone down in the US, I'm really hoping Hennessy offers the job to Duddy. Duddy has probably blown his chances of fighting for a world title when he lost his unbeaten record. So why not come back to the UK and fight for the Commonwealth and British titles? After all he is from Northern Ireland so he would qualify for both belts. Barker v Duddy anyone?
Re: Macklin vs Barker off?
it is a shame that barker is willing but can't get anyone to fight him. it's understandable that everyone has their own career path, but a shame that the direct fights that matter slip by.
hennessy mentioned kofi jantuah. i wish that fight could have happened. prospect dmitry pirog got and beat jantuah instead.
does andy lee quialify for commonwealth title eligibility?
hennessy mentioned kofi jantuah. i wish that fight could have happened. prospect dmitry pirog got and beat jantuah instead.
does andy lee quialify for commonwealth title eligibility?
Re: Macklin vs Barker off?
If Macklin gives up the British rather than face Barker, then subject to the BBBofC approval, Thirlwall could get a crack. Easy fight to make for Hennessy.
As for Hennessy and Warren working with each other, they already are, in as much their fighters are facing each other. Elcock-Macklin, Barker-McDermott and McIntosh-Cleverly. Hennessy having ITV coverage is clearly making these fights viable.
As for Hennessy and Warren working with each other, they already are, in as much their fighters are facing each other. Elcock-Macklin, Barker-McDermott and McIntosh-Cleverly. Hennessy having ITV coverage is clearly making these fights viable.
Re: Macklin vs Barker off?
Autobarn wrote:it is a shame that barker is willing but can't get anyone to fight him. it's understandable that everyone has their own career path, but a shame that the direct fights that matter slip by.
hennessy mentioned kofi jantuah. i wish that fight could have happened. prospect dmitry pirog got and beat jantuah instead.
does andy lee quialify for commonwealth title eligibility?
lee dos qualify because he was born in london , duddy is dropping down to light middle , i cant see either of these fighting barker tbh high risk low reward