khan v bradley

Post Reply

khan v bradley

khan by KO or TKO
1
2%
khan on points
14
25%
bradley by KO or TKO
35
63%
bradley on points
6
11%
 
Total votes: 56

THE PRINTER
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 49
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:03

khan v bradley

Post by THE PRINTER »

You know what I'm starting to like Khan, but that's because there is many boxers I dislike in the JWW division, mainly Bradley and Alexander. I just hope Khan leanrs how to be tough and his chin improves. Khan is a nice dude, easy to root for, I hope he becomes the #1 JWW one day. But right now Pacquiao is the #1 guy and I now Khan doesn't stand a chance against the Pac-Man, but how would he fare against Bradley..........
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: khan v bradley

Post by brian13 »

Bradley is a class act and I think he is better than Hatton but he would take Khan apart and win on points.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: khan v bradley

Post by tonyevs »

Bradley has got very under-rated skills and a great boxing brain.

Bradleys natural style is perfect to beat Khans fast flurries.
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3172
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: khan v bradley

Post by deadpan »

Bradley is several steps above Khan. Can you picture Gomez or Limond dropping him?

Bradley is too strong and seasoned for Amir. A knockout within the first half.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: khan v bradley

Post by n1ebf »

i went for Bradley on points but Bradley in the first half is completely conceivable, whereas I think Bradley would be to clever/ dangerous for Khan to put away with those flurries which have accounted for so many, without actually even putting them over.

I like Khan, fck what some people say on here. I posted a detailed response to a DG post a few days ago on the (British) Light Welters but it bloody disappeared but basically I think Witter would have done Hatton....he certainly would be likely to now I think (although with Junior it's completely possible he'd box a negative boring fight, or just not turn up at all)........I think Khan Witter would be a great fight and I couldn't pick a winner.....(although that was last wee, after this weekend maybe the chinks are starting to show in Witter)....and I think that Ricky Hatton should just, and probably will, retire...Khan would have him for breakfast at this stage. Khan is going to continue getting better with each fight, not to mention more powerful.....pretty soon he's going to be a nightmare.....I think he could surpass even Ricky's career in time, and that would be some achievement.
I just hope it's in Manchester and not London and Walsh free!
Webbo911
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 572
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 07:18

Re: khan v bradley

Post by Webbo911 »

If Bradley hit Khan with the same shot that he dropped Witter with, it's goodnight.

I think khan needs a bit more experience before going in with somebody of Bradley's caliber.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Re: khan v bradley

Post by Max Molyneux »

Depends how much Bradley goes in with the headbutts. He's pretty go forward like Kotelnik but with more workrate.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: khan v bradley

Post by Counter-puncher »

Max Molyneux wrote:Depends how much Bradley goes in with the headbutts. .
his headwork being a very good reason Khan may be steered away from him iMO
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: khan v bradley

Post by dondada »

If Khan boxed like he did against Kotelnik and Bradley as he did against Witter, I'd go for Khan on points.

Bradley seems to be good but very orthodox, if you get my drift. Witter was terrible against Bradley and it was still pretty close on the cards.

Then again, perhaps I just haven't seen enough of Bradley. I remember seeing Zinedine Zidane play a couple of times and thinking 'What's all the fuss about?' :lol:
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: khan v bradley

Post by Captain Hook »

I've gone for Khan on points, think he would be too quick for Bradley, though Bradley by TKO would be worth a few quid down the bookies if it ever happened.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: khan v bradley

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Then again, perhaps I just haven't seen enough of Bradley. I remember seeing Zinedine Zidane play a couple of times and thinking 'What's all the fuss about?' :lol:
shit haircut, shit player right. :lol:

i'd favour bradley on his strength.

just has a bit more substance than khan.

wouldn't totally rule khan out though.

he has got good skills. :box:
caffrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 16 Sep 2008, 15:52

Re: khan v bradley

Post by caffrey »

bradley is obviously so much better than kotelnik but i still think a vastly improving kahn would win a points decision.Bradley just does not have the style to cope too good with kahns speed.
i personally still reckon kahns gonna drop back to lightweight if a htton fight cant be made
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: khan v bradley

Post by alexpaterson »

Bradley would pressure him and when Khan has a lapse in concentration by putting his hands down Bradley will catch him with that right hand and then it would be good night Amir imo
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: khan v bradley

Post by Autobarn »

caffrey wrote:bradley is obviously so much better than kotelnik but i still think a vastly improving kahn would win a points decision.Bradley just does not have the style to cope too good with kahns speed.
i personally still reckon kahns gonna drop back to lightweight if a htton fight cant be made
actually i'm not sure of that. in what way is he so much better? are any of his wins etter than kotelnik's win over maidana?

they're both pressure fighters without a punch. kotelnik more technical, bradley more aggressive. the only way i can see bradley being better is that he's a bit more willing to gamble, to rip into the opponent.

i agree though, khan's mobility will be difficult for bradley. bradley isn't particularly strong and isn't particularly fast. some of his opponents looked as if they didn't want to be there in the first place and this is making ppl think that he's some monster pressure fighter.
bigped
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1572
Joined: 05 Jul 2004, 16:26

Re: khan v bradley

Post by bigped »

deadpan wrote:Bradley is several steps above Khan. Can you picture Gomez or Limond dropping him?

Bradley is too strong and seasoned for Amir. A knockout within the first half.

Put Gomez or Limmond in with Khan now and they wouldnt stand a chance of landing a punch if anything, the khan that got dropped of limmond and gomez would have got beat from kotelnck. Khans a different fighter now very hard to beat,
Post Reply