Eastman No 1 ?

Post Reply
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Eastman No 1 ?

Post by Neri »

Howard eastman no 1 middleweight in the world according to boxrec computer rankings, the system needs sorting out i think
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Post by Neri »

Bernard shouldnt be no 1 light middle based on what he weighed as he holds the middleweight belts
REAL_DEAL
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5027
Joined: 09 Jul 2003, 06:42

Post by REAL_DEAL »

yes that needs changing to hopkins.
Last edited by REAL_DEAL on 25 Sep 2004, 07:35, edited 1 time in total.
Guest
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by Guest »

He didn't look like Number 1 anything last night. :roll:
kevin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by kevin »

It's because Boxrec have changed the programming so that it puts people in weight classes based on the weight in their last performance, and it is done with a couple of pounds either way I believe so Hopkins ends up as a Light-middle?

Kev
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Eastman didn't look that good last night but needed a good workout, he just doesn't work hard enough for my liking and although never hurt just got a little disorganised at times. I like watching him though, he is a good tactician and very methodical boxer who works well on the outside, however i think this world title "surge" may be coming a little late in his career and i doubt he has enough left to beat Jermain Taylor who is a special talent. Eastman will give Taylor problems but i just don't think he has enough in the tank to dominate for long spells against the fresher and possibly hungrier youngster.
Lefthookhappy19
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 968
Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 19:15

Post by Lefthookhappy19 »

Taylor has yet to fight a real middleweight while he's a very big middle himself. He hasn't proved a damn thing.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

I am a massive Eastman fan but has he proved anymore than Taylor? He lost his one big chance so far against Joppy and while Taylor hasn't fought in that class yet he has disposed all comers including Marquez, Martinez, Cervera and Hill with clinical punching, a great jab and the ability to box on the front foot or off the back foot.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

steve689 wrote:I am a massive Eastman fan but has he proved anymore than Taylor? He lost his one big chance so far against Joppy and while Taylor hasn't fought in that class yet he has disposed all comers including Marquez, Martinez, Cervera and Hill with clinical punching, a great jab and the ability to box on the front foot or off the back foot.
I would say Taylor has better WINS on his resume than Eastman. Whilst I don't want to go doing Hopkins a disservice in anyway - he had an easier time with Joppy than I expected and perhaps it is in an indication of Joppy being overated.
Post Reply