- I liked Larry just fine in the day, but I never could figure out why he wouldn't fight the best in the division, the other young prime champs. By the time of dubious decisions leading to Rocky record, I figured the streak was another DKing engineered scam. Dempsey/Louis were never shut down against Tunney/Charles like Holmes was against Spinks in that first fight.Robinson wrote: I had Holmes just winning against Williams. BUT...lets say he lost....
plenty of champs have had their 'gift' wins in the ring.
Is Holmes loss, which was close...any worse than say...a Dempsey(Tunney),
Louis(Charles) etc losing to a LHW ?
And I had Holmes ahead of Norton in that fight, quite comfortably.
Holmes was a late starter as such, and developed nicely. He was able to
prove that in his late 40s that he was a capable contender and entertainer.
Your hate of Holmes hurts my heart BRR.
Nor did I see applicable contender aptitude into his forties. His best fight was the Field loss and that down to Field having another of his meltdowns in the ring that he was quite fortunate to have an old toothless dog hobbling about with assistance from the ropes to go against.
If Calzaghe had a half dozen prime talented supermid title holders in his division he'd been avoiding for 7 yrs the outrage would blow the earth's atmosphere into space. Holmes the poster boy for the modern breed of ABC champ manufactured like sausage by promoters and boxing orgs.
Need to remember that Ernie Shavers didn't need a highly disputed split decision to use a past his best Norton to gild Shaver's lilly like Mr. man used Kenny to do for Holmes. If Holmes is made one of the top heavies ever based on his Norton win, then Shavers must be top dog in the historical rankings as he demolished Norton months later.
