JOHNSON/JONES BETTING
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
JOHNSON/JONES BETTING
glencoffe johnson is 100/1 for EVERY round with blue square to stop jones. what the hell is the reasoning behind this? Jones has come off a devastating stoppage loss, and they put EVERY round at 100/1??!!
do they even know what they're doing?
hell, i'm not having a bet on that, but still, 100/1 for EVERY ROUND?
Someone else said that roy jones's legs have gone. i agree. I think he will get stopped tonight, just don't know what round he's going down in.
let's say I put £10 each on rounds 4, 5, 6, and 7. If you were a bookies, would you worry about this? I certainly would.
we'll have to see.
do they even know what they're doing?
hell, i'm not having a bet on that, but still, 100/1 for EVERY ROUND?
Someone else said that roy jones's legs have gone. i agree. I think he will get stopped tonight, just don't know what round he's going down in.
let's say I put £10 each on rounds 4, 5, 6, and 7. If you were a bookies, would you worry about this? I certainly would.
we'll have to see.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
fornicate wish I had read this thread before I went out at the weekend, I would definetly had a punt at least a quid on each round and a bet on Johnson to win.
I really am going to have to start betting on my hunches, I would be well ahead if i did. Although i predicted Jones to win, I knew Johnson had a shot and that is enough.
I'm going to have a flutter on williamson to beat Wlad I think, he's looking vulnerable.
I really am going to have to start betting on my hunches, I would be well ahead if i did. Although i predicted Jones to win, I knew Johnson had a shot and that is enough.
I'm going to have a flutter on williamson to beat Wlad I think, he's looking vulnerable.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
these kind of fights are golden for knowledgeable punters, you have to take advantage. I should have emptied my account on johnson, i was so confident that jones was shot and he wouldn't be able to live with a mauling, pressure fighter in johnson.
the question is, when will there next be a fight in which a shot great fighter is made an unjustifiably huge favourite against a 6/1 opponent. I cashed in on tyson/williams, jones/tarver II and now jones/johnson this way.
it's the easiest way to make money. the bookies really don't have a scooby doo when it comes to how shot a fighter is. they just assume the fighter will magically return to their best.
the question is, when will there next be a fight in which a shot great fighter is made an unjustifiably huge favourite against a 6/1 opponent. I cashed in on tyson/williams, jones/tarver II and now jones/johnson this way.
it's the easiest way to make money. the bookies really don't have a scooby doo when it comes to how shot a fighter is. they just assume the fighter will magically return to their best.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
You're totally right, myself and David Payne who come on here, used to help advise a guy who was the oddsmaker for boxing for William hill, and there are people a lot more knowledgable than either of us.
in my prediction on Max, I said that if Jones was struggling with the weight or struggling to pull the trigger (which it seems he was, the latter at least), then Johnson had a good chance.
Clinton woods also said that of the two, Johnson hit far harder punch for punch, which surprised me.
I didn't know the odds were so long, otherwise I would definetly have had a small punt on each round, and about 20 quid on Johnson to win outright.
I am going to have a bet on Williamson to beat Wlad, I think Wlad is mentally gone and that he will succumb again.
in my prediction on Max, I said that if Jones was struggling with the weight or struggling to pull the trigger (which it seems he was, the latter at least), then Johnson had a good chance.
Clinton woods also said that of the two, Johnson hit far harder punch for punch, which surprised me.
I didn't know the odds were so long, otherwise I would definetly have had a small punt on each round, and about 20 quid on Johnson to win outright.
I am going to have a bet on Williamson to beat Wlad, I think Wlad is mentally gone and that he will succumb again.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
i don't know about that james to be honest. davarryl williamson is hardly mr reliable either in the chin department. I see him getting blown out as quick as mesi did it. if wiliamson couldn't handle mesi's shots, think what a GENUINE puncher like wlad will do. davarryl wil probably be scared shitless when he enters that ring.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13284
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
-
knockout artist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1482
- Joined: 03 Sep 2003, 13:18
Re: JOHNSON/JONES BETTING
O MY GOD!Riddick Blowe wrote:glencoffe johnson is 100/1 for EVERY round with blue square to stop jones. what the hell is the reasoning behind this? Jones has come off a devastating stoppage loss, and they put EVERY round at 100/1??!!
do they even know what they're doing?
hell, i'm not having a bet on that, but still, 100/1 for EVERY ROUND?
Someone else said that roy jones's legs have gone. i agree. I think he will get stopped tonight, just don't know what round he's going down in.
let's say I put £10 each on rounds 4, 5, 6, and 7. If you were a bookies, would you worry about this? I certainly would.
we'll have to see.
You are monster! I was just reading this old post and now I am wondering did you put your money and won?
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00