NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post Reply
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post by AntonS »

The Authority had informed BoxRec of the following:-

Ammann V's Withers: TECH DRAW to now read WIN DISQULIFICATION Ammann 1:20 Round 1 (DSC).

The Authority's decision was by reason of what was determined to be the deliberate use of the right elbow on two occasions by Daniel Withers, the second occasion causing the cut to Daniel Ammann which inturn caused the bout to be stopped by the ringside Physician.

Dib V's Yamaguchi: TKO Dib to now read NO CONTEST 2:59 Round 1.

The Authority's decision was by reason of what was determined to be deliberate and illegal activity by both contestants during the round.
Marlin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5078
Joined: 08 May 2006, 06:56

Re: NSW Decision Amendments

Post by Marlin »

:o What? Are you serious? Why? This actually makes sense!
Soundkamp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 335
Joined: 01 Dec 2008, 17:15

Re: NSW Decision Amendments

Post by Soundkamp »

i didnt see the Withers v Ammann. So i cannot comment

But glad the Dib outcome was changed.
toppity
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2802
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 22:03

Re: NSW Decision Amendments

Post by toppity »

I can't believe this :o . Both calls are correct, but this is a very rare occurance for a governing body to review and rectify. Hats off to them for this announcement. The sport is better for it.
rb63
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 62
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 00:47

Re: NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post by rb63 »

Great result for boxing.
Hounddawg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4035
Joined: 26 Feb 2008, 07:50

Re: NSW Decision Amendments

Post by Hounddawg »

Soundkamp wrote:i didnt see the Withers v Ammann. So i cannot comment

But glad the Dib outcome was changed.
Mate it was Blatent, Ammann was gutted, i still dont know why Jamie done it, he actually looked the better boxer, but it was a deliberate foul twice and a DQ, i'm glad that this has happened, maybe they can get it on again for the rubber match.

Well i guess it shows that no one is above the law, Dib with all his contacts and support will not be gifted fights anymore. :TU:
Last edited by Hounddawg on 10 Aug 2009, 08:37, edited 1 time in total.
ryan711
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 326
Joined: 22 Nov 2006, 08:13

Re: NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post by ryan711 »

wow hats off to the Nsw Authority for doing the right thing with the fights.Now the Nsw Authority needs to stop the mismatched fights that go on.
Rogue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 718
Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 05:50

Re: NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post by Rogue »

Good stuff from NSW commission..... great!!!
madball1982
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 527
Joined: 11 Mar 2008, 01:25

Re: NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post by madball1982 »

I'm surprised that they did this, well done (claps hands). Especially didn't see the Dib fight being changed given that he's a top prospect. Figured the blind eye would be used. I'm glad to be wrong.
Beltane
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4057
Joined: 02 Aug 2007, 02:12

Re: NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post by Beltane »

Justice has been served at last and kudos to the officials for doing the right thing.

A pox upon anyone who disputes this decision.
Soundkamp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 335
Joined: 01 Dec 2008, 17:15

Re: NSW Decision Amendments

Post by Soundkamp »

Hounddawg wrote:
Soundkamp wrote:i didnt see the Withers v Ammann. So i cannot comment

But glad the Dib outcome was changed.
Mate it was Blatent, Ammann was gutted, i still dont know why Jamie done it, he actually looked the better boxer, but it was a deliberate foul twice and a DQ, i'm glad that this has happened, maybe they can get it on again for the rubber match.

Well i guess it shows that no one is above the law, Dib with all his contacts and support will not be gifted fights anymore. :TU:
I have seen Jamie fight a couple of times hes not to shabby.

i think its a good slap in the face for Dib to wake up to himself and realise that he is still no one in the world of boxing.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post by Asterix »

Kudos to the New South Wales boxing commission, from an English boxing fan. :TU:
'Frilla
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2716
Joined: 27 Jul 2009, 07:39

Re: NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post by 'Frilla »

I didnt think they could AMEND fights that are already done and recorded :roll:
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post by AntonS »

harshfriller wrote:I didnt think they could AMEND fights that are already done and recorded :roll:
There's no such rule
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: NSW Decision Amendments - Dib & Ammann

Post by Asterix »

harshfriller wrote:I didnt think they could AMEND fights that are already done and recorded :roll:
They're not amending the fight, but the record of the fight, because it was incorrect.
Post Reply