You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post Reply
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Who do you keep them away from, in respect to other legends of their weightclass?

Not much time, so I'll just add one, & colour others in later. I'd keep Foreman away from Tunney. Not much respect if he does win from people stating the latter was just too small, but Tunney was as determined, & almost as out-&-out tough, as he was an intelligent boxer & ring general. He could make Foreman look bad in winning, &, possibly, even swing the upset. He's one fighter I'd keep Foreman away from. Joe Walcott is another, for much the same reasons. Have to think Foreman'd beat both, but too little reward for too much risk, IMO.

Have at it, gents.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by Robinson »

If I had Holmes...i would train him, get him to stay in supreme shape.
And take on anyone !!!

Provided we got paid well...and we had adequate warm ups for some
of the greater guys.

I would try to avoid fights with Tyson, unless the money was really
good. I am confident we would win, though it would be hard.

We would like a show down with Ali in good time, but would like some
good money for it, as it would be a fight the fans wanted and would
be a hard win for each guy.

We would not fight Patterson, simply because Larry and Floyd are good
mates and work together in the gym.

Upon winning the title Holmes is to meet
Willard, Dempsey and Burns....those three have been scheduled and
signed as challengers.
We do however have good money and negotiations on a Charles fight
as well as a show down with Corbett. So many contenders out there,
we are sifting through what ones we can face at a given time. Though
the champ and I are eager to see him stay active with 3-4 defences a
year.

We have given a guranteed shot to the winner of the Foreman-Marciano
bout, should we get past Willard.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by The Great John L »

I would have kept John L away from John Barleycorn.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Robinson wrote:If I had Holmes...i would train him, get him to stay in supreme shape.
And take on anyone !!!

Provided we got paid well...and we had adequate warm ups for some
of the greater guys.

I would try to avoid fights with Tyson, unless the money was really
good. I am confident we would win, though it would be hard.

We would like a show down with Ali in good time, but would like some
good money for it, as it would be a fight the fans wanted and would
be a hard win for each guy.

We would not fight Patterson, simply because Larry and Floyd are good
mates and work together in the gym.

Upon winning the title Holmes is to meet
Willard, Dempsey and Burns....those three have been scheduled and
signed as challengers.
We do however have good money and negotiations on a Charles fight
as well as a show down with Corbett. So many contenders out there,
we are sifting through what ones we can face at a given time. Though
the champ and I are eager to see him stay active with 3-4 defences a
year.

We have given a guranteed shot to the winner of the Foreman-Marciano
bout, should we get past Willard.
Is there no great HW champ in history you consider too great a risk-reward ratio for Holmes?

Incidentally, Holmes is another my head tells me to keep Foreman away from. I think it's a near pick 'em fight, so I should steer clear, but the thought of Foreman laying out Holmes is just too tempting, & I think I'd throw my boy in there. Holmes'd never handle the early heat when his jab failed to keep Foreman off, I'd convince myself. Maybe. Maybe not.
allworld80
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3468
Joined: 09 Dec 2006, 20:12

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by allworld80 »

I would tell him to move up a weight class and force some of these legends who use a pole vault to skip 140, to actually face you in the ring. 8)
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by yancey »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Who do you keep them away from, in respect to other legends of their weightclass?

Not much time, so I'll just add one, & colour others in later. I'd keep Foreman away from Tunney. Not much respect if he does win from people stating the latter was just too small, but Tunney was as determined, & almost as out-&-out tough, as he was an intelligent boxer & ring general. He could make Foreman look bad in winning, &, possibly, even swing the upset. He's one fighter I'd keep Foreman away from. Joe Walcott is another, for much the same reasons. Have to think Foreman'd beat both, but too little reward for too much risk, IMO.

Have at it, gents.
I'd keep Gene Tunney about 8 time zones and 3 continents AWAY from George Foreman.

I would prefer my fighter (Tunney) retire with his head still attached.

:D
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Too many people would expect Foreman to walk over Tunney. I'm not convinced (not to say it wouldn't happen, mind) that's the foregone outcome. If Foreman won convincingly, it'd be all, "Tunney was too small, didn't have the punch to keep Foreman off him, etc," but if Foreman lost or were to be made to look bad in winning (not, to my eyes, inconceivable, as I rate Tunney extremely highly) it'd be Foreman who came out embarrassed.

I'd still favour Foreman to succeed, to clarify --- just stating the risk-reward ratio is too severe.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by alexpaterson »

Rocky Marciano keep him away from Ali, Lewis and Klitschko I think these 3 can outbox him for the 12/15 round duration there reach and boxing skills would be the key I dont see anyone stopping the Rock but on decisions :TU:
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by Robinson »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
Robinson wrote:If I had Holmes...i would train him, get him to stay in supreme shape.
And take on anyone !!!

Provided we got paid well...and we had adequate warm ups for some
of the greater guys.

I would try to avoid fights with Tyson, unless the money was really
good. I am confident we would win, though it would be hard.

We would like a show down with Ali in good time, but would like some
good money for it, as it would be a fight the fans wanted and would
be a hard win for each guy.

We would not fight Patterson, simply because Larry and Floyd are good
mates and work together in the gym.

Upon winning the title Holmes is to meet
Willard, Dempsey and Burns....those three have been scheduled and

signed as challengers.
We do however have good money and negotiations on a Charles fight
as well as a show down with Corbett. So many contenders out there,
we are sifting through what ones we can face at a given time. Though
the champ and I are eager to see him stay active with 3-4 defences a
year.

We have given a guranteed shot to the winner of the Foreman-Marciano
bout, should we get past Willard.
Is there no great HW champ in history you consider too great a risk-reward ratio for Holmes?

Incidentally, Holmes is another my head tells me to keep Foreman away from. I think it's a near pick 'em fight, so I should steer clear, but the thought of Foreman laying out Holmes is just too tempting, & I think I'd throw my boy in there. Holmes'd never handle the early heat when his jab failed to keep Foreman off, I'd convince myself. Maybe. Maybe not.

Not really. They all pose unique threats. It is a case of the right preparation and
timing. The champ needs to be in the best shape and the right shape for each
opponent. We have some good strategies and training partners to meet each threat
as they appear.

We have a lot on the horizon, but we can only take on what is in front
of us at each moment.

Foreman will get his fight, we are confident that the Champ will beat him.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by Robinson »

GI

We will talk soon regarding a Holmes-Foreman show down.

I think we need to time it right where both parties are happy
and are $atisfied with the conditions.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Robinson wrote:GI

We will talk soon regarding a Holmes-Foreman show down.

I think we need to time it right where both parties are happy
and are $atisfied with the conditions.
:lol:

Larry will never be happy, because my boy would never agree to an evenly-split purse George knows he is & always was the draw, & won't fight for less than 70%. Problem is, Larry wants the whole purse :lol:
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: You're Managing Your All-Time Favourite Fighters...

Post by Robinson »

If George can bring $15 million to the table then you can have your even
split.
Post Reply