Moore V Rhodes is On!

Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by Poncey »

leforge wrote:Being held at Carnell leisure centre I think what capacity there?
Bigger venue being looked at at the moment. But not far away.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by Wales »

MEN was being mentionedfor Piccirillo fight... a huge Maloney card, any chance... or am I going too big here?
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by Poncey »

Wales wrote:MEN was being mentionedfor Piccirillo fight... a huge Maloney card, any chance... or am I going too big here?
Yes. Where we were last time. :wink:
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by whicker »

Wales wrote:MEN was being mentionedfor Piccirillo fight... a huge Maloney card, any chance... or am I going too big here?
Maybe as a half-hall, with the upper tier closed, so about 3000 people?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by leforge »

I reckon reasonably priced with good undercard could do 3,500.
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by teddy007 »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:What a great match! Hope it stays made. :TU:
x2

Will try and make this one.

x3 good fight and I will be there.
gemmell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 16:12

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by gemmell »

Wales wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
Wales wrote:Easy nights work for Jamie... next
It won't be, it will be a very tough fight for him.
Not in my eyes. Whilst Rhodes has been struggling with the lieks of Jamie Coyle and Vincent Vuma Jamie has been in the form of his life against PIccarillo and then the Ukranian. Jamie looked devastating in both fights.

Dont get me wrong, Ryans a good fighter, but at this stage in his career he's a level below Jamie Moore, and Jamie looks to be peaking.
I agree jamie is peaking..he is on the verge of a world title shot i think he is ranked 3 by the wbc..and the light middleweight division is not at it's strongest so he has a good chance of becoming champ..rhodes is will be put under too much pressure and i can see jamie stopping him in 10..should be a cracker tho! october is a big month of boxing!!!!!!!!
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by leforge »

I think I come north of for this too looks a cracker.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by leforge »

I think I come north of for this too looks a cracker.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by whicker »

leforge wrote:I reckon reasonably priced with good undercard could do 3,500.
I know it's early, but anyone any idea what might be supporting this?

The main event alone makes this a top quality Friday Fight Night, exactly what that show needs.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by leforge »

Sykes v Barrett is on bill check my board news thread.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by hurlock »

moore will do the buisness on him.
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by brian13 »

Wales wrote:MEN was being mentioned for Piccirillo fight... a huge Maloney card, any chance... or am I going too big here?
Doesn't allegedly have exclusive rights to that venue for boxing.
opticald
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by opticald »

whicker wrote:I'm curious why people think Moore will be the betting favourite?

Rhodes will edge this fight, I think.
personally I think it's a horrible fight for Moore and he'll get exposed here.

Rhodes has the exact style to do him. Moore is nothing more than a come forward pressure fighter. A hardy bast*rd, but nothing special skillwise (Amazing that some on here have argued and presented cases that he'd beat Paul Williams).

I am prepared to give him credit for beating Rhodes (who is domestic level). Lets keep this in perspective though, for the way Moore is hyped on this forum, he should be having absolutely NO problems with Rhodes, a guy who lost to Lockett (and we all remember that Pavlik farce).

Personally I see Rhodes being unorthodox and making things very awkward. He will be very dangerous with the hooks and straight punches.

Moore gets exposed in this fight. (Like I said, I'll give him credit for winning, but remember, this is only domestic level).
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by whicker »

opticald wrote: Moore is nothing more than a come forward pressure fighter. A hardy bast*rd, but nothing special skillwise (Amazing that some on here have argued and presented cases that he'd beat Paul Williams).
Well, he looked good against Piccirillo (but then, the question- how "shot" was Piccirillo?)

His last defence was a predictable win over a limit opponent, who perhaps shouldn't have been allowed to challenge for the title.

He has stopped Andrew Facey and Matthew Macklin, though, both quality domestic opponents.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by Wales »

brian13 wrote:
Wales wrote:MEN was being mentioned for Piccirillo fight... a huge Maloney card, any chance... or am I going too big here?
Doesn't allegedly have exclusive rights to that venue for boxing.
He did have, not sure how long that was for as it started when Hatton went to Fight Academy in 2005. Surely the MEN wouldnt have been tied in for this long, especially with the lack of boxing frankies put on there, would they? Like I say the MEN was mooted for the Piccirillo fight, but wasnt viable according to sky. Where else is there in the North West that holds around 3000?

I cant see them taking the fight to Sheffield, although Jamie told me he'd fight Baysangurov in the Ukraine if his team won the bids, so sheffield to fight Rhodes wont bother him.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by Wales »

opticald wrote:
Moore gets exposed in this fight. (Like I said, I'll give him credit for winning, but remember, this is only domestic level).
This is european level.

Jamies in a no win situation with you then, shame as he's far better than you give him credit for. His defensive boxing against macklin was nothing short of superb.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by twenty six »

This fight takes place in either Wigan or Manchester.
I will post as soon as venue confirmed.
Last edited by twenty six on 14 Aug 2009, 08:10, edited 1 time in total.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by DG. »

Ryan is a good fighter, but not on Moores level.

Moore wins by KO7


:TU:
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by Wales »

twenty six wrote:This fight takes place in either Wigan or Manchester.
I will post a soon as venue confirmed.
be a shame if tis robin park arena. Nice venue, and a cauldron of an atmosphere, but the fight is bigger.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by DG. »

whicker wrote:I'm curious why people think Moore will be the betting favourite?

Rhodes will edge this fight, I think.

Because he is better all round.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by DG. »

opticald wrote:
whicker wrote:I'm curious why people think Moore will be the betting favourite?

Rhodes will edge this fight, I think.
personally I think it's a horrible fight for Moore and he'll get exposed here.

Rhodes has the exact style to do him. Moore is nothing more than a come forward pressure fighter. A hardy bast*rd, but nothing special skillwise (Amazing that some on here have argued and presented cases that he'd beat Paul Williams).

I am prepared to give him credit for beating Rhodes (who is domestic level). Lets keep this in perspective though, for the way Moore is hyped on this forum, he should be having absolutely NO problems with Rhodes, a guy who lost to Lockett (and we all remember that Pavlik farce).

Personally I see Rhodes being unorthodox and making things very awkward. He will be very dangerous with the hooks and straight punches.

Moore gets exposed in this fight. (Like I said, I'll give him credit for winning, but remember, this is only domestic level).

Paul Williams is a different kelttle of fish, but Rhodes of today gets beaten fairly easily imo.

3 years ago I would say Moore had no chance against Sergio Martinez, but now he has a good chance.

Rhodes is too erratic and not the fighter he was, imo.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by DG. »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:blimey.

i take back everything i said about rhodes pulling out of the small fight.

decision vindicated. :TU:

Why take it back? He deserved it at the time.

I think this will be the last we see of RR as a contender.
doctorboxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by doctorboxing »

Great fight and a fantastic chance for Moore to prove he really is world class by beating a good euro level fighter in Rhodes.

Who knows, maybe the spice boy will roll back the years and put on a show?

Looking forward to it!
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Moore V Rhodes is On!

Post by twenty six »

DG,
Stop talking bollocks.
Rhodes had to pull out of the Small fight due to illness.
Before the Small fight could be rescheduled, oppertunities came to light at EU and EBU level.
To fight at Euro level you have to relinquish the British title.
That's when he relinquished the title which enabled Small to fight for the vacant, and allowed Rhodes to be ready willing and able to take the Euro fight - which is exactly what has happened.
So on what basis exactly did Rhodes deserve the unfounded accusations ?
What would you have done Mr DG - the font of all knowledge ?
Post Reply