

You do tend to flog dead horses thoughFLINT ISLAND wrote:Teddy007 - please stop sending me hatemail you repulsive person...................
teddy007 wrote:If you dont think he isn't owt special then there is something up with you mentally, he is a very talented boxer and world-class fighter. Flint go back to the rock you crawled from under and stop this obsession with Enzo.NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Haye isn't all that by a long chalk. He's a massive hitter though, bigger than Enzo. I was on Enzo to win over 12. I like Haye's approach to fighting the best but I don't think he's owt special. Gets hit too easily for a start.
Good post.NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:teddy007 wrote:If you dont think he isn't owt special then there is something up with you mentally, he is a very talented boxer and world-class fighter. Flint go back to the rock you crawled from under and stop this obsession with Enzo.NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Haye isn't all that by a long chalk. He's a massive hitter though, bigger than Enzo. I was on Enzo to win over 12. I like Haye's approach to fighting the best but I don't think he's owt special. Gets hit too easily for a start.
Klitschko would have obliterated him in less than 5 rounds.....either, or. Not saying that that makes someone no good, cos Haye is good and he's got a good set on him, I admire that, he's not a ducker. Am just saying I don't think he's this fckin second coming that people make out he is.
He was on queer street against Thompson, Fragomeni, Mormeck etc...
It's one thing to say I've got a mental problem, but then you said you'd take Calzaghe in a street fight didn't you...and you fckin believed it and I bet you still do!
So no offence taken mate.
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:teddy007 wrote:If you dont think he isn't owt special then there is something up with you mentally, he is a very talented boxer and world-class fighter. Flint go back to the rock you crawled from under and stop this obsession with Enzo.NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Haye isn't all that by a long chalk. He's a massive hitter though, bigger than Enzo. I was on Enzo to win over 12. I like Haye's approach to fighting the best but I don't think he's owt special. Gets hit too easily for a start.
Klitschko would have obliterated him in less than 5 rounds.....either, or. Not saying that that makes someone no good, cos Haye is good and he's got a good set on him, I admire that, he's not a ducker. Am just saying I don't think he's this fckin second coming that people make out he is.
He was on queer street against Thompson, Fragomeni, Mormeck etc...
It's one thing to say I've got a mental problem, but then you said you'd take Calzaghe in a street fight didn't you...and you fckin believed it and I bet you still do!
So no offence taken mate.
What on earth are you wittering on about. Enzo was supposedly a world champion, he at least had a belt, and was being touted around as the best in the division. If he wasn't going to fight Haye, what was the point?FLINT ISLAND wrote:Exoddus wrote:How was fighting Haye a mistake?
Maccarenelli wanted to be the best at his chosen sport. In his weight division. He would have been ranked #1 cruiserweight if he beat Haye.
The guy tried to become the best cruiserweight in the world, but he failed. Why go into any sport and not try to become the best you can be?
Enzo wasn't good enough. He wont be remembered in 100 years time. All respect where it's due. The guy tried and it didn't work out for him. Maybe he can become a great trainer? Something he couldn't do as a boxer.
Yeah mate I understand what you are saying
Enzo deserves the respect of being a raw fighter who was willing to step in the ring with the Hayemaker
He got guts and heart
Its just in hindsight it looks like that fight ruined him - at least mentally
He took the chance - but he was found he was not on that level - but he was unable to bounce back
That means the fight damaged him long term - rather than be a learning experience
hasn't he ducked not one but two Klitchkos in the space of a few months?NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
Klitschko would have obliterated him in less than 5 rounds.....either, or. Not saying that that makes someone no good, cos Haye is good and he's got a good set on him, I admire that, he's not a ducker. .
Well, only because of Setanta, allegedly. Would you fight Wlad K for free? That was what the deal amounted to given Setanta's imminent demise.Counter-puncher wrote:hasn't he ducked not one but two Klitchkos in the space of a few months?NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
Klitschko would have obliterated him in less than 5 rounds.....either, or. Not saying that that makes someone no good, cos Haye is good and he's got a good set on him, I admire that, he's not a ducker. .
Yeah mateCoco wrote:You do tend to flog dead horses thoughFLINT ISLAND wrote:Teddy007 - please stop sending me hatemail you repulsive person...................
I have always claimed this alsoNorthEastBoxingFan wrote:teddy007 wrote:If you dont think he isn't owt special then there is something up with you mentally, he is a very talented boxer and world-class fighter. Flint go back to the rock you crawled from under and stop this obsession with Enzo.NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Haye isn't all that by a long chalk. He's a massive hitter though, bigger than Enzo. I was on Enzo to win over 12. I like Haye's approach to fighting the best but I don't think he's owt special. Gets hit too easily for a start.
Klitschko would have obliterated him in less than 5 rounds.....either, or. Not saying that that makes someone no good, cos Haye is good and he's got a good set on him, I admire that, he's not a ducker. Am just saying I don't think he's this fckin second coming that people make out he is.
He was on queer street against Thompson, Fragomeni, Mormeck etc...
It's one thing to say I've got a mental problem, but then you said you'd take Calzaghe in a street fight didn't you...and you fckin believed it and I bet you still do!
So no offence taken mate.
opticald wrote:Enzo could have beaten Haye.
Look, I hate Enzo and everything he stood for in boxing. (WBU, fighting bums, etc).
However, he was going the right way with things like his hard fought win over Bruce Scott. He learned a lot there about coming back and grew in confidence and heart. BUT he just stayed in his little coccoon and fought BUMS for years. This is what took the edge off him and ripened himm up to get BLASTED out by the likes of Haye.
Maccrinelli had the potential. Good size, speed, and power. Things to work on. If he'd have taken himself to America and slogged over there for a couple of years instead of living the high life with his WBU and fighting bums and believing his own hype about his power, he could have been a lot better than he was.
Haye was dropped by Mock and Thompson and has been hurt. It would only have taken one from Enzo.
Unfortunately he was just found out as a bully. You listen to any of his interviews and it's impossible to like the chap. He seems like an absolute prize pr*ck to me. And it's a shame, because it's that foolish attitude that killed his career. Now he's in bigtime limbo. He really only has himself to blame though.
FLINT ISLAND wrote:Teddy007 - please stop sending me hatemail you repulsive person...................
poodlepoo wrote:with a gun/knife or light sabre?Hagler2002 wrote:I also think I could take Joe in a street fight, with the greatest of ease actually
Never happen? Don't be so sure, I have heard Joe is going to come out of retirement for a street fight Rocky Balboa - Tommy Gunn style.teddy007 wrote:I'm not even going to go into it, people can laugh and take the p1ss I dont care. No one can judge me and no one knows what i'm about, lets leave it at that. It was a silly thing to say but it has been said and it will never happen so lets move on.
You say Enzo going in with Haye was throwing him in to deep yet say you thought Enzo would have won over 12? And with Enzo being WBO 'world' champ and one of the top two cruisers in britain how was that throwing him in deep?FLINT ISLAND wrote:REAL_DEAL wrote:Why you going over old ground. This obsession with Enzo has to stop.
Its not old ground
This is a refelction on his career now it appears to be in ruins and looks over.
The lesson learnt is maybe not throwing fighters in too deep
Because a loss like that seemed to ruin the rest of his career
yeah I tend to follow the boxing more than the politics....i have no interest in second guessing from snipets that those in the know , want, or don't want you to know / think.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Well, only because of Setanta, allegedly. Would you fight Wlad K for free? That was what the deal amounted to given Setanta's imminent demise.Counter-puncher wrote:hasn't he ducked not one but two Klitchkos in the space of a few months?NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
Klitschko would have obliterated him in less than 5 rounds.....either, or. Not saying that that makes someone no good, cos Haye is good and he's got a good set on him, I admire that, he's not a ducker. .
Hagler2002 wrote:I also think I could take Joe in a street fight, with the greatest of ease actually