Hypothetical Match-Up Game

My2Sense
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 768
Joined: 31 May 2008, 17:53

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by My2Sense »

I Feel Fine wrote:
Fifteen rounders:

Carmen Basilio vs. the Duran of the first Leonard fight

Undercard: Julian Jackson vs. Rocky Graziano at 157 lbs
Basilio weathers a furious early barrage by Duran and then wears him down with his size, strength, and bodypunching. A strong finish secures a fair decision win for Basilio.

Jackson uses his superior (and underrated) boxing ability to score points and avoid an all-out slugfest with Rocky. Rocky manages to slip inside and score a knockdown with a big right hand, but Jackson manages to avoid being knocked out and then comes back to KO Rocky a round or two later.


Jackson then goes on to fight Iran Barkley at 160.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

...but falls short, dropping a split decision to Barkley. No shame, there.

168lbs twelve-rounder --- Mikkel Kessler & Antwun Echols (Primes)...
Marlin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5078
Joined: 08 May 2006, 06:56

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Marlin »

Echols fights hard, often pushing the action but Kessler's one-two is just to good and busts Echols up over the distance. Kessler wins a wider than expected decision.

Tommy Ryan v Oscar De La Hoya at middleweight
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Ryan gets the nod over a soft-looking, lacklustre 160lb. De La Hoya any day of the week.

I love this surprisingly rarely-mentioned hypothetical, & am going to divide it into an ever-evolving trilogy...

Jim Jeffries-Rocky Marciano I --- 12 Rounds.

Jim Jeffries-Rocky Marciano II ---15 Rounds.

Jim Jeffries-Rocky Marciano III --- A Fight To The Finish.
allworld80
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3468
Joined: 09 Dec 2006, 20:12

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by allworld80 »

Rock finishes him in under 12 in all 3 fights IMO. Hit far too hard for the likes of Jeffries. If anyone can break it down further,
be my guest.

Tommy Morrison (1993) vs Andrew Golota (1996)
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Morrison won't be around long enough to test Golota's will. Both were reachable, but the shots Golota nailed Bowe with (particularly in their second fight) would've put Morrison out in four. Golota proved he could take punishment from Bowe for a while before cracking. Morrison can't hang once hit. Golota, TKO4.

Jeffries recuperates from a hat-trick of losses to Marciano, & lines up in a twenty-rounder against Dempsey...
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Robinson »

Dempsey manages to stop Jeffries in fight mared with lots of
wild blows and lots of clinching. Dempsey stays low and
stops Jeffries after himself being on the canvas.

Dempsey KO 15.


Jeff Harding vs Iran barkley LHW peak match 12 rounds
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Barkley wins a split decision in a terrific, exciting affair. That'd be a very watchable fight, IMO. Harding wants a rematch upon announcement of the decision.

James "Lights Out" Toney (1992) vs. Tommy "Hitman" Hearns (1985) at Middleweight over twelve rounds...
I Feel Fine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by I Feel Fine »

Toney in '92 was very mediocre at Middleweight. Hearns by a decision... if he doesn't get robbed like Tiberi and McCallum did.
Sumbu Kalambay vs. Arthur Abraham at 160 for 12 rounds
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4457
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by NazNaci1 »

Nice skills on display and initially a good chess match, in which Kalambay starts fast, sweeping the first 3 rounds.

Abraham, now warmed up, begans to time and lauch some decent body shots. After 10 rounds its pretty tight but Kalambay is still quiet fresh and with Abraham tiring as the fight draws to close, stick's and moves to earn a close, but fair, UD.

Next:

Luis Angel Firpo vs David Tua (Heavyweight Undercard - 12 Rounds)

Ezzard Charles vs Bob Foster (Undisputed Light Heavyweight World Title - 15 Rounds)
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Robinson »

Tua KO 1. Firpo does his best to stay in it, but is sent down twice
until he finally stays down.

Foster and Charles have a great fight, both taking turns leading on
the cards. Foster wobbling Charles in the 5th, and Charles rocks Foster
in the 8th. Both take turns stalking, it is Charles who manages to land
some telling combinations and right hands on Foster he starts to lean
into range more and more as the fight comes to an end.

Charles SD 15


The rematch...

Ezzard Charles vs Bob Foster II 175lbs 15 rounds

and

Harold Johnson vs Thomas Hearns @ 168lbs, 15 rounds.

and

Floyd Patterson vs Mike McCallum @ 168lbs, 15 rounds.
I Feel Fine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by I Feel Fine »

Charles would probably stop Foster in 12 rounds. Foster was arguably the best Light Heavyweight champion of all time, but Charles was the best Light Heavyweight of all time.
Johnson stops Hearns in five
Patterson gives Mike McCallum his first TKO loss... Why not have Vitali Klitschko vs. Rafael Marquez...

Next: Terry Norris vs. Felix Trinidad at 154 in a 12 rounder
Azumah Nelson vs. Juan Manuel Marquez at 130 lbs in a 12 rounder
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Robinson »

Because Vitali never fought at MW, or LHW like Patterson did.
So the size thing is a bit retarded for you to bring up Rafael Marquez
vs Vitali.

Do you honestly think Floyd was not a SMW-LHW ? He fought at
HW because that was where the money was and because you
could be his size and hang career wise at that weight. Floyd had
a good chunk of his early fights at around the SMW mark.

Floyd Patterson 6' and 164-200lbs
Mike McCallum 5'11 1/2 and 155-182lbs

So is that really a size mismatch ? and it is not as though that McCallum
did not have some decent skills.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Terrific battles you nominated there, IFF, but it's doing my head in trying to determine a winner in each of them. I can visualise both Norris & Trinidad on the canvas, for instance, with their seconds removing the gumshield. Nelson & Marquez is an engaging & tight chess match.

I'll let the next poster pick the victors.
I Feel Fine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by I Feel Fine »

I am a huge admirer of Mike McCallum. I think based on accomplishments he is the best champion that 154 has ever seen, though I do wonder if he could have beaten Hearns. I think McCallum beat Toney twice, and that as a result the only real loss he had under 175 was Kalambay, and McCallum reversed that loss in a close but I thought clear decision victory the second time. McCallum is one of the greatest fighters ever to fight at 154-160. But people have been watching the Sonny Liston fights a bit too often if they think that Floyd Patterson was some mediocre fighter. He was a wrecking ball, especially against fighters his size. McCallum with a size disadvantage has little chance.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by The Great John L »

I Feel Fine wrote:I think McCallum beat Toney twice...
I'm glad you posted that. For the longest time I thought I might be the only person who had that opinion.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Robinson »

Sorry to disrupt the flow of this thread.
BUT.... I am one of the Patterson cheerleaders here mate, I know he
was a force. I also feel he was a decent guy at a lower weight and
would be hard to beat. But I do not think McCallum would be over
powered as such, as the guy had some damned fine skills.
My contention with you is that you likened my match up as being
the equivalent of Vitali vs Marquez...which I thought to be daft.

That is all mate.
I Feel Fine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by I Feel Fine »

Daft? Well, from what I have seen, I haven't found any of your posts in this thread to be lacking in "daftness." Mayweather gets a draw with Leonard at 147... I have to laugh at that, even as a very big, long time Mayweather fan. Floyd gets a bit too much grief from people, he is a great fighter, but would he draw with Welterweight Leonard? No chance in hell. And of course it is automatic that seemingly anyone who fights Ali in 1976 or later will apparently get robbed, because Joe Frazier hadn't just lost two fights to Ali, and because Joe did so much with himself after Manila. Joe of course did not get his own gift against Cummings either.
Anyone who can think their way out of a paper bag can probably understand my Klitschko-Marquez hyperbole. It does a disservice to both Patterson and McCallum to put them head to head. Pound for pound McCalum rates higher, but Floyd is hardly out of his league in that sense. Considering, however, that Patterson is the bigger man, even at 168 pounds, where he was crushing people and where McCallum was older and past his best, it is not the most competitive fight I can think of and Patterson should not be underrated in this way. It is even more unfair to McCallum, because he should get a shot against someone more in his range.
I don't need to be lectured by you about McCallum's skills or abilities. He was one of the most multi-dimensional fighters of his era, and it wasn't a bad era, to say the least. Patterson was not exactly a dumb fighter, however, and he hit a wee bit harder than Herol Graham.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Robinson »

IFF

Have a nice little sit down and Ill get the nurse to bring you your sugared tea
later.

Let the thread continue.

Have a nice weekend precious.
I Feel Fine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by I Feel Fine »

You're not going to leave us with any Valuev vs. Calderon fights while you're here? Shame. Calderon might pull it off.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Robinson »

No but I am sure plenty here will post
Valuev vs Ketchel or George Dixon and have big boy
Valuev losing by KO.

Though to you McCallum and Patterson were worlds
apart in the size department.

Have a nice day dearest.
I Feel Fine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by I Feel Fine »

Dearest? That must be your name for those who give you a good spanking, I suppose.
The difference between McCallum and Patterson in terms of skill and ability is not the difference between Valuev and Ketchell, my friend, but anyone who believes that Patterson was not too big and too good for McCallum might as well believe that Leonard was not too big and too good for Mayweather. But it is not for me to explain, it is for you to learn, and you have quite a great deal to go apparently. "Worlds apart" or not, you're talking about fighters who fought in different realms. One guy was fighting 200+ pounders for the majority of his years and one was fighting men his own size, 154-160, for most of his. As I said, I thought McCallum beat Toney twice, but even a weight drained James appeared to be the bigger man with the bigger punch and he was able to stun McCallum which is likely why he got those rip off decisions. That Patterson hit a lot harder than a Middleweight Toney I think needs no explanation, but given your performance here I should probably point that out. Thomas Hearns late in his career was probably not a lot smaller than Rocky Marciano his career, but I will leave it for you to decide if this would be a legitimate fight to bring up for discussion.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Robinson »

Cool thanks for that.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

They are talking about Hearns against Dempsey over on MaxBoxing (Imbeciles), so who knows?
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Hypothetical Match-Up Game

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Okay, to get things moving again, Norris knocks out Trinidad, & Nelson decisions Marquez.

Ingemar Johansson faces off with Leon Spinks for twelve rounds. Joe Walcott & Max Baer do battle over the same distance across town...
Post Reply