Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

Post by The Law »

coneye wrote:
The Law wrote: True :TU:

..... Furthermore, a lot of boxing news hits this forum before it reaches the media .....
They probably do , but i doubt its to learn anything that is'nt old gossip around the gym's ,its more to do with reading and posting , just like they pick up the news of the world or boxing monthly to read stuff they already know
On the contrary, numerous boxers/managers have come across news being discussed on the boxrec forums of which they had no knowledge of. This is through my personal experience of speaking to various boxers/managers.

News tends to be leaked here through a wide range of sources and the forum is better for it.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27508
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

Post by stujones »

I think there is an automatic sign in function... so if you tick this, you will not need to sign in all the time.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

Post by Spud »

Whilst I appreciate "Shep" and his team may want more traffic/hits on here - I personally think it is completely correct move to have to sign it to gain access to this forum.

There are at times some top quality threads on here - and also there are some excellent "rucks" and "banter" too - the correct word that should be used is "quality" and personally I think boxrec beats any other forum easily on that score.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9018
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

Post by Syntax Error »

Why are Ireland & Britain lumped together?

They're 2 separate nations entirely.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

Post by Horse »

Syntax Error wrote:Why are Ireland & Britain lumped together?

They're 2 separate nations entirely.
Not really.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26448
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

Post by banjo »

Horse wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:Why are Ireland & Britain lumped together?

They're 2 separate nations entirely.
Not really.
:KO:

Even though there's miles of water inbetween them and are governed differently?

How much more separate can you get?
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28506
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

Post by Coco »

banjo wrote:
Horse wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:Why are Ireland & Britain lumped together?

They're 2 separate nations entirely.
Not really.
:KO:

Even though there's miles of water inbetween them and are governed differently?

How much more separate can you get?
Legally Northern Ireland is a part of Great Britain.
Furthermore Eire has many historical, sporting and cultural links.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

Post by Horse »

banjo wrote:Even though there's miles of water inbetween them and are governed differently?

How much more separate can you get?
Botswana and Japan.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

Post by Asterix »

Syntax Error wrote:Why are Ireland & Britain lumped together?

They're 2 separate nations entirely.
Closely linked nations. Better to maintain a relationship, than to breed a thought of separation. Many of us Brits have Irish heritage.
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: Why no lurkers allowed in the British?

Post by chinny »

can we start including the Phillipines? They have an awesome fighter
Post Reply