Fury V McD round by round ?

Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by Shirow »

McDonut robbed. 98-92 to Fury. Maloney is going to blow a gasket.
exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by exittored »

surprising
Last edited by exittored on 11 Sep 2009, 21:25, edited 1 time in total.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by jBacca »

Absolutely shocking.
MPG
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 642
Joined: 14 Aug 2005, 17:06

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by MPG »

98-92 lmao
The Hawk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 547
Joined: 16 Jan 2004, 21:57

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by The Hawk »

What a load of bollocks the verdict, you can tell Fury knows he was lucky, shocking!!!!
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by Datsue »

98-92?

Load of shite.

Maybe the ref suffered some kind of brain trauma & thought McDermott was the big slow one getting hit with overhand rights.

He did give away he last two rounds, but come on...
Last edited by Datsue on 11 Sep 2009, 17:55, edited 1 time in total.
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by My T Sharp »

The only logical explanation is that McDermott stole one of O'Connors pies
U.F.O
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 279
Joined: 20 Dec 2008, 19:38

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by U.F.O »

what a ******* joke :evil:
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by m1kee50 »

Datsue wrote:Fvcking disgusting.

McDermott won that.
aye. will O'Connor have to explain that? BN should try to interview him

Maloney felt short-changed after the first williams fight, this time its legitimate.
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by Bennyblanco »

Draw
sy86
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 105
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 07:11

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by sy86 »

When Fury has 30 fights under his belt he would be beat Mcd, but tonight Mc was robbed!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Hawk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 547
Joined: 16 Jan 2004, 21:57

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by The Hawk »

exittored wrote:YESSSSSS

TYSON WINS LIKE EXPECTED

CLOSE BUT I HAD TYSON WINNING 6-4 RDS
Do you know how to score a fight? :lol:
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by stevieb_8006 »

didnt see the fight. was it close at all? U lot make it sound liker it was all 1 way traffic? Did tyson take any flush and do u think the fight will stand him in good stead?
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by whicker »

Oh, course- 10 rounds and just the ref scores.
exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by exittored »

Changed my opinion
Last edited by exittored on 11 Sep 2009, 21:25, edited 1 time in total.
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by Shirow »

O'Connor has a lot of explaining to do and can look forward to an old fashioned pikey beatdown on the walk to his car.
McCannW14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 501
Joined: 05 Dec 2007, 17:57

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by McCannW14 »

Thats boxing. Always has been crooked always will be.
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by TerribleTerry »

Sounds like McDermotts solid fundamentals and greater experience had him winning this..
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by jBacca »

exittored wrote:O'CONNOR DID A GOOD JOB...

He was closer to the action than anyone...he saw the clean punches landed.

Dont be calling him a cheat when your sitting watching on your LAPTOP or TV.

Good Victory for TYSON, a good learning fight.
Sorry, it's your opinion, but you're chatting shit.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by whicker »

boxrec wrote:how come there were no judges. Why just the ref?
English Title
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by Bennyblanco »

Wonder if the ref was the one who put 50 grand on fury to win?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27512
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by stujones »

stevieb_8006 wrote:didnt see the fight. was it close at all? U lot make it sound liker it was all 1 way traffic? Did tyson take any flush and do u think the fight will stand him in good stead?
The fight was close - which makes the 98-92 score card hard. McDermmott won rounds big, all of Tyson's rounds (on my card) were close.
The Hawk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 547
Joined: 16 Jan 2004, 21:57

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by The Hawk »

exittored wrote:O'CONNOR DID A GOOD JOB...

He was closer to the action than anyone...he saw the clean punches landed.

Dont be calling him a cheat when your sitting watching on your LAPTOP or TV.

Good Victory for TYSON, a good learning fight.
I seen plenty of right hands bouncing off Furys head!!! Fury's jabs in that fight would not crack an egg
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28509
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by Coco »

Mcdermott will only be a decent gatekeeper domesticly, however you scored it(John had it for me), he has been genuinely exposed tonight, and clearly isn't good enough to get past domestic level.
Hennessy will take him back down a level for a while now.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Fury V McD round by round ?

Post by jBacca »

Hope Pricey knocks Fury the fornicate out.
Post Reply