Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by alexpaterson »

It's on in 5 minutes

Last prediction's? :TU:
Floyd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 207
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 17:14

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by Floyd »

I think the Fin stops him mid fight.
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by teddy007 »

alexpaterson wrote:It's on in 5 minutes

Last prediction's? :TU:
I don't no too much about Asikainen but him and Macklin are both fringe world class but lets be honest Pavlik eats them both in the same night, thats not to say the winner cannot win a world title.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Asikainen ko 7th
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by alexpaterson »

teddy007 wrote:
alexpaterson wrote:It's on in 5 minutes

Last prediction's? :TU:
I don't no too much about Asikainen but him and Macklin are both fringe world class but lets be honest Pavlik eats them both in the same night, thats not to say the winner cannot win a world title.
I've never seen him box either I agree Pavlik would beat them but Sylvester and Strum might be better for them imo
opticald
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by opticald »

looks like smith got told to take the week off after last week :DDD
pm
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 264
Joined: 07 Mar 2006, 04:58

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by pm »

so much for that then lol
pm
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 264
Joined: 07 Mar 2006, 04:58

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by pm »

1st rd tko win for Macklin
Fatsam
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 13 Jun 2008, 11:14

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by Fatsam »

Did not like the stoppage to be honest, he was about to survive that first round in my opinion.
opticald
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by opticald »

Good win for Macklin.
Floyd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 207
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 17:14

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by Floyd »

I really called that one on the money.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by Datsue »

Fantastic.

I've always liked Assaikia- Assaikaia- the Finn, but he was fecked there. His eyes were clear but his legs were in Junior Jones land.

If that had gone on, would he have survived a follow-up barrage? I think he would just have toppled again -- he went down in between the knockdowns without taking a punch.

Well done, Macklin.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by Asterix »

Shame it was over so quickly, but well done Macklin. It was a very good shot that got him the victory.
opticald
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by opticald »

Keep Adam Smith in the presenter position. he is decent in that position. Keep him away from the ring but I would like to see him replace the darts fella.
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by lefthook82 »

you have to feel for those finish fans

quickest fiver i ever lost.
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by teddy007 »

Datsue wrote:Fantastic.

I've always liked Assaikia- Assaikaia- the Finn, but he was fecked there. His eyes were clear but his legs were in Junior Jones land.

If that had gone on, would he have survived a follow-up barrage? I think he would just have toppled again -- he went down in between the knockdowns without taking a punch.

Well done, Macklin.
IMO he should of been of been let to continue, this is a title fight after all.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by Asterix »

teddy007 wrote:
Datsue wrote:Fantastic.

I've always liked Assaikia- Assaikaia- the Finn, but he was fecked there. His eyes were clear but his legs were in Junior Jones land.

If that had gone on, would he have survived a follow-up barrage? I think he would just have toppled again -- he went down in between the knockdowns without taking a punch.

Well done, Macklin.
IMO he should of been of been let to continue, this is a title fight after all.
I think so too, but I think the result would have been the same no matter what. That first left hook spelt the end.
jammidodger
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 217
Joined: 19 Nov 2007, 17:06

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by jammidodger »

thought it was a bit of a premature finish tbh but he caught him lovely with that left hook.. great dig!!!
FLINT ISLAND
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10 Feb 2009, 17:12

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by FLINT ISLAND »

He was worst after the 1st knockdown

Then the ref stopped him on the 2nd knockdown - and did you see the shock / protest on his face.

Ref done the home fighter a favour there.

Every chance he was caught cold / early - could have been a tough fight - but the ref is senstivie to the home town fighters advatnage.

Nothing against Macklin though - -- good explosive performance.
OldAndy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28
Joined: 04 Jun 2008, 17:08

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by OldAndy »

Surely with Asikainen up at the count of 2, coherent enough to put his gloves up, and the round almost over... taking a quick moment to ask him to step forward and assess his balance was the very least the ref should have done? Maybe Asikainen was finished, but it would have taken the ref 1 or 2 seconds to give him a proper chance to show if he could continue.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Well Done Matthew Macklin proved me wrong :TU:
The_Don1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 07:32

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by The_Don1 »

impressive stuff from macklin...but still the ref should have let him continue...if he'd have gone down again then yeah stop it then, but the guy got up quickly and signalled he was ok to go on, premature stoppage IMO let's face it Benn was out on his feet against Mclennan in the 1st round and he came back to win it
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by Deserter »

Gutted there was no way of watching this for me but even given the questionable nature of the stoppage it sounds like a hugely impressive performance by Macklin and justifies his decision to bypass Barker. After all the moving camps and the stop/start nature of his career he finally seems to be hitting the sort of form that had him marked as such a hot prospect in the early days.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by 15829 »

was a cracking atmposhere and a all round decent show couldn't tell if it was stopped to soon everyone was still jumping round after 1st knock down
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Macklin vs Asikainen RBR

Post by Datsue »

teddy007 wrote:
Datsue wrote:Fantastic.

I've always liked Assaikia- Assaikaia- the Finn, but he was fecked there. His eyes were clear but his legs were in Junior Jones land.

If that had gone on, would he have survived a follow-up barrage? I think he would just have toppled again -- he went down in between the knockdowns without taking a punch.

Well done, Macklin.
IMO he should of been of been let to continue, this is a title fight after all.
I see your point, Teddy -- I would probably be more inclined to let it go if I was the ref, like I said, I like the Finnish fella, he's been a favourite of mine since he battered Sylvester the first time (I can't stand Sylvester), I would have actually liked him to have won tonight -- but I really thought the writing was on the wall after that second knockdown. Legs weren't right, & they weren't going to get any better.

It wasn't like Marquez in the first against Pac, was it, where he was getting knocked clean off his feet but seemed solid afterwards, it was the wobbliness in his legs that caused the ref's intervention. I concede it could have gone on longer but I don't think the final outcome would've been all that different.
Post Reply