Bastards Sky

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 10 Dec 2004, 18:58

i hate when sky cut rounds out. 1,2,3,4,7, 9 WTF sky would rather spend 10 minutes talking about williams - klitsschko. you have 2 build up shows for that. i wanted to see all of the lacy fight :x :x :x :x

red dragon · Post by **red dragon** » 10 Dec 2004, 19:11

i've turned the show off as those wankers are showing the fight in fornicating
widescreen.

red dragon

PS real deal,i forgot to sent you that tape,will send it to you on
monday,also when i get the american version show the lacy v sheika
show would you like a free copy of it.

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 10 Dec 2004, 19:14

:surprised:

Lefthookhappy19 · Post by **Lefthookhappy19** » 10 Dec 2004, 20:04

Same here about the wide screen. Thought it was my tv. Skys boxing is so fornicating half assed.

Lefthookhappy19 · Post by **Lefthookhappy19** » 10 Dec 2004, 20:16

Also. Im getting so fornicating sick of Sky. Are they being paid by FW or something. Are his fighters beyond critisism? Just the same old bullshit the way they talk about future opponents for Calzaghe with Lacy and others. They aren't going to happen, all of Calzaghe's doing. Just like the way they talk about Hatton going to the US when its just never ever going to happen. They constantly talk about the Cotto fight. Like its ever going to happen, again. Bastards. Bunch of yes men. Just call it like it is. Its the truth after all. FW's fighters are running scared of the best.

*Rant over*

glittermonkey · Post by **glittermonkey** » 10 Dec 2004, 20:24

Well, I haven't had a moan for a couple of days. So I'll just chip in, and agree with the bit about the widescreen, that pissed me right off.

Oh, and you're right about Calzaghe. They insist on calling him the world champion at super-middle. He may have been the best fighter at the weight (though that could be up for debate), but he's never been a legit world champion.

mrbassie · Post by **mrbassie** » 10 Dec 2004, 20:38

Missed a bit of Lacy-Sheika while I was fannying around with me cable settings, then to top that off I notice the missing rounds, fornicating useless!

fightfirstdvd · Post by **fightfirstdvd** » 10 Dec 2004, 20:41

I am very angered at this because I told my US trader that I wouldn't require this bill.

I onlu hope that he's DVD'd it for himself.

My T Sharp · Post by **My T Sharp** » 11 Dec 2004, 07:49

Cause the coverage starts at 10 tonight, does this mean Ricky is the only live fight and the undercard will be selected highlights? They will probably edit those aswell...

Cannibal · Post by **Cannibal** » 11 Dec 2004, 08:56

There's a Matt Skelton fight on there right? I'm sure they'll show that in full.

KOJOE90 · Post by **KOJOE90** » 11 Dec 2004, 09:03

Cannibal wrote:There's a Matt Skelton fight on there right? I'm sure they'll show that in full.

Skelton is not on the bill as far as I am aware.

Cannibal · Post by **Cannibal** » 11 Dec 2004, 09:04

Did they pull him? I heard a couple of times he was meant to be on that bill.

My T Sharp · Post by **My T Sharp** » 11 Dec 2004, 09:04

Cannibal wrote:There's a Matt Skelton fight on there right? I'm sure they'll show that in full.

no Skelton isn't on. Krence v McDermott and Kazaz V McDermott should be decent though, and hopefully they might show a bit of Matt Marsh again.

jameswilson · Post by **jameswilson** » 11 Dec 2004, 11:10

My T Sharp wrote:
Cannibal wrote:There's a Matt Skelton fight on there right? I'm sure they'll show that in full.
no Skelton isn't on. Krence v McDermott and Kazaz V McDermott should be decent though, and hopefully they might show a bit of Matt Marsh again.

McDermott is fighting twice