Carl Froch is FINISHED!

Phenomenal-Nutrition · Post by **Phenomenal-Nutrition** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:34

Dirrell completely schooled Froch, makes you ashamed to be an Englishman tonight. The judges were bought off, it wasnt close, Froch barely landed. Nothing else to be said

jBacca · Post by **jBacca** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:35

Agree with you.

Eraserhead · Post by **Eraserhead** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:36

Froch isn't a fraud. He's just a limited slugger with a world-class chin and great power.

Boxing is the fraud.

Like you say, Froch got school tonight and lost practically every round. I can't believe that just happened.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:36

Great power? The three world class opponents he has faced have gone 12 and two of them were on their feet the whole time. His power is way overated

alexpaterson · Post by **alexpaterson** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:37

Dirrell deserved the victory I had it 116-111 on the outside Froch was getting outboxed Dirrell was too fast and skillful and fought the fight he needed too to win with holding and moving

Poor judging

Eraserhead · Post by **Eraserhead** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:38

Bunce, Rosenthal and Rawling should be ashamed. We're all Brits and we all wanted Froch to win, but Jesus on a bike...what the hell are these guys lying for? We all watched the fooking fight, Buncey! You're talking rubbish. It's cringe-worthy.

jBacca · Post by **jBacca** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:38

Dirrell gave Froch a boxing lesson.

Phenomenal-Nutrition · Post by **Phenomenal-Nutrition** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:40

Eraserhead wrote:Froch isn't a fraud. He's just a limited slugger with a world-class chin and great power.

Boxing is the fraud.

Like you say, Froch got school tonight and lost practically every round. I can't believe that just happened.

Well he was talking about being 1 of the best ever, and now Froch is pretending he's won, so if he pretends he won that he is a fraud

U.F.O · Post by **U.F.O** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:40

We found out all we needed to know about Froch in the Taylor fight, he is what he is, but he is definalty riding his luck at the momnet and has no chance against Kessler imo

Spud · Post by **Spud** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:40

I have always supported Froch since his debut - but IMO he did not win that fight.

Kessler will take him apart.

the patriot · Post by **the patriot** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:41

sg1985 wrote:It was not a schooling. Grow up. You saw the same fight I did. There were very tight rounds. But I thought dirrell did enough.

X2

I had Dirrell winning 115-113. I thought it was close but IMO no way did Froch do enough to win.

Phenomenal-Nutrition · Post by **Phenomenal-Nutrition** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:42

Eraserhead wrote:Bunce, Rosenthal and Rawling should be ashamed. We're all Brits and we all wanted Froch to win, but Jesus on a bike...what the hell are these guys lying for? We all watched the fooking fight, Buncey! You're talking rubbish. It's cringe-worthy.

We knew the rest were corporate buy outs, Bunce now is too (if he wasnt before)

LOL Tarver just called Froch 'CROTCH'

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:44

Carl can not fight fast fighters. Lucky to get the win. I had
It by 2 for d r I v v e l l.but he is not a worthy winner do glad fright got it!

gemmell · Post by **gemmell** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:45

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Eraserhead wrote:Froch isn't a fraud. He's just a limited slugger with a world-class chin and great power.

Boxing is the fraud.

Like you say, Froch got school tonight and lost practically every round. I can't believe that just happened.
Well he was talking about being 1 of the best ever, and now Froch is pretending he's won, so if he pretends he won that he is a fraud

shutup u fuc#in idiot.dirrell ran and held the whole fight.you cant win the wbc by fighting so negatively tbh.dirrell probly won the fight. he was so so negative

froch is by no way a fraud you knob

Spud · Post by **Spud** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:47

I completely agree that Dirrell did not want to get involved and ran all night but in my view boxing is also about not getting hit and Dirrell won the fight - albeit in a negative way.

It was not a good advert for boxing.

jimglen · Post by **jimglen** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:47

first I will say Froch DID WIN this fight... Dirrel DIDN'T WANT TO FIGHT, did nothing but hold and although he threw more punches he was rarely effective.

Froch whom I like, and had a great hope for, I'm sorry to say IS far too one dimensional, he has forgotten how to box and all he had to do from the mid rounds on was to "tuck in", go after Dirrel and way in to him... he DOESN'T know how, too one dimensional and though some of that credit goes to Dirrel's work (running scared), negative as it was

Froch just didn't know what to do and I fear his run is over.

Kessler and Abraham should beat him!

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:48

gemmell wrote:
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Eraserhead wrote:Froch isn't a fraud. He's just a limited slugger with a world-class chin and great power.

Boxing is the fraud.

Like you say, Froch got school tonight and lost practically every round. I can't believe that just happened.
Well he was talking about being 1 of the best ever, and now Froch is pretending he's won, so if he pretends he won that he is a fraud
shutup u fuc#in idiot.dirrell ran and held the whole fight.you cant win the wbc by fighting so negatively tbh.dirrell probly won the fight. he was so so negative froch is by no way a fraud you knob

Show us the rule that says that. If you outbox a guy like Dirrell did to Froch tonight you deserve the decision, no matter how ugly or unetertaining it was. It is not the boxers job to make an entertaining fight, their first goal is to win.

Phenomenal-Nutrition · Post by **Phenomenal-Nutrition** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:48

gemmell wrote:
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Eraserhead wrote:Froch isn't a fraud. He's just a limited slugger with a world-class chin and great power.

Boxing is the fraud.

Like you say, Froch got school tonight and lost practically every round. I can't believe that just happened.
Well he was talking about being 1 of the best ever, and now Froch is pretending he's won, so if he pretends he won that he is a fraud
shutup u fuc#in idiot.dirrell ran and held the whole fight.you cant win the wbc by fighting so negatively tbh.dirrell probly won the fight. he was so so negative froch is by no way a fraud you knob

Fraud = pretending your something your not, which is what Froch is doing by pretending he won. It wasnt always pretty but its called boxing not brawling. But at least you admit Dirrell won

Spud · Post by **Spud** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:48

Stop being stupid.

I had Dirrell winning the fight but Froch is hardly finished even if Abraham and Kessler beat him.

I think Kessler is now a massive favourite - but to say Froch is finished is plain stupid.

alexpaterson · Post by **alexpaterson** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:49

Kessler will beat Froch use his reach and jab to keep Froch off and win a wide UD as for AA his defence would take all Froch's on the gloves then come back with his own and get Froch and win on points widely

But he's not finished

jBacca · Post by **jBacca** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:49

crusader wrote:
gemmell wrote:
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Well he was talking about being 1 of the best ever, and now Froch is pretending he's won, so if he pretends he won that he is a fraud
shutup u fuc#in idiot.dirrell ran and held the whole fight.you cant win the wbc by fighting so negatively tbh.dirrell probly won the fight. he was so so negative froch is by no way a fraud you knob
Show us the rule that says that. If you outbox a guy like Dirrell did to Froch tonight you deserve the decision, no matter how ugly or unetertaining it was. It is not the boxers job to make an entertaining fight, their first goal is to win.

Exactly.. Dirrell (entertaining or not), beat Froch, and thus should have that shiny belt around him.

MecnunK · Post by **MecnunK** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:50

I consider myself a big Froch fan but what happened tonight was shameful. Dirrel should have won by 3 rounds atleast and I think Froch knew it hence the tirade on negativity..

stevieb_8006 · Post by **stevieb_8006** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:51

sing it with me every1......

1234....."Styles make fights"

ALI · Post by **ALI** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:51

Froch's limitations were there for all to see, but to call him a fraud is brainless

I usually hate to see someone get robbed, but not tonight. Dirrell won on my card, but he stank the joint out, he did not come to fight, he came to spoil and grab and sneak the rounds. Thats never been what boxings about and i for one am happy he lost. He should take up another sport, i dont ever want to see him fight again!

dazzer · Post by **dazzer** » 17 Oct 2009, 22:52

dirrel won the fight easy

Carl Froch is FINISHED!

Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Carl Froch is FINISHED!

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Carl Froch is FINISHED!

Re: Carl Froch is FINISHED!

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Carl Froch is FINISHED!

Re: Froch = Fraud

Re: Froch = Fraud