Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by n1ebf »

GLOBALBOX wrote:
opticald wrote:
banjo wrote:Hunter was getting the piss beaten out of him, Ortiz and Witter pulled the worst kind of quit job - quitting in a fight they still had a chance of winning - and rightly got slated for it.
Hunter wanted to quit at the end of the previous round mate, when things got a bit tough but he was still in the fight. At least Ortiz and Witter fought through the really rough moments and tried to hang in there. What they did was essentially QUIT too though, don't get me wrong. I just think Hunter should be given at least the same calibre of stick they were getting.Using NEBFs logic we shouldn't criticise Witter or Ortiz for quitting since they were the ones in there and they thought they were only going to take more punishment. Can't have it both ways pal.


Also, Hunter is a KNOWN quitter. I predicted he would quit in the fight once the going got tough.
Never understand why we have to label boxers as quitters, anyone who climbs through the ropes has my respect and once a man has had enough, who knows it better than the fighter himself.

Jesus christ theres days where we have flu and dont get out of the effing bed because of a poxy cold virus and yet the boxing public demands a man gets the life punched out of him just so he is not labelled a quitter.

Every punch from a non puncher was hurting Hunter, he was being beaten up by a smaller man, he was mentally and physically beaten, the man has shown us all enough courage in previous fights (a la Pickering) to know he has balls the size of pomegranites.

There have been enough injuries and death from this game, all we do by labelling fighters as quitters is give someone the incentive to carry on for one last round and perhaps take a telling blow.

Green was already looking at getting Hunter out of there anyway, if it had been a non title 10 rounder either he or Fannan would have got Hunter out before the actual retirement.
This is how reasoned, intelligent posters post on Boxrec (GLOBALBOX). Respect :TU:
Last edited by n1ebf on 18 Oct 2009, 13:37, edited 1 time in total.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by n1ebf »

Wrists wrote:Why not cot congratulate Booth on another very good performance lads?
Why not thank Hunter for all the good nights he has given NE boxing??

Rather than act like a couple of plebs in an open forum!!

:shame:

100% spot on. :TU:

And this thread shows that that is exactly what I did straight away. Others want to try following suit. I even went so far as to keep my cash off this one, even though based on previous I thought Hunter was good value, for the sole reason, that in entertainment terms over the years, Michael Hunter has paid me back the face value of my ticket a thousand-fold. I don't have any intrest in trying to make a bit of quick cash while he gets punched after what he's given the sport, AND the region!
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by n1ebf »

.
Last edited by n1ebf on 08 Dec 2009, 07:19, edited 1 time in total.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by n1ebf »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
opticald wrote: Also, Hunter is a KNOWN quitter. I predicted he would quit in the fight once the going got tough.
I cannot speak for the forum Opticald, and I won't try to, but reading through the post I was unsurprised to see your name next to it.

You already have revealed yourself to be a persona non grata, with a taste for needlessy rubbishing people's efforts that have more talent than you in their left testicle. Say it ain't so??
NEBF - this chap is lirva. Don't know how much history you have on here but he shouldn't be allowed on at all - nothing to do with his forceful views on how most of us are 'mugs' and he is the Oracle of Delphi.
this much i figured out b4 the fight even took place. I guess people are exactly right about him. :TU:
opticald
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by opticald »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
this much i figured out b4 the fight even took place. I guess people are exactly right about him. :TU:
:lol:

Still hurting from seeing Hunter quit AGAIN I see.

I don't know what your problem is with me. Is it because I rightfully predicted Hunter wasn't in Booths league? Or is it because I rightfully predicted Hunter would quit? You had lots to say about those predictions before the fight but of course you ended up looking like a mug after the fight. Pocketrocket has been on this forum and the SO forum and has a very good reputation mate. When people disagree and say Hunter QUIT in the Molitor and Booth fights, it doesn't make them idiots mate. It's called pragmatism. You have abused Hagler, rhino, pocketrocket and myself on this thread once your beloved Hunter was criticised. Out he went and quit again which is what we all knew was going to happen (money was made on the fight mate).
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by n1ebf »

Ahh...come in...I've been expecting you....bring your friend.....I'd have pulled his chicken wings off and dipped them in the Colonel's special sauce only I was consorting with some loose women elsewhere while that sh*tbucket of a show was taking place in Robin Hood country.......

Jason 2 Smooth Booth saved Nottingham's face this weekend with that scintillating performance, albeit against a now limited opposition (didn't I just learn it!!!). That boy can surely crack when he wants to.....for a show that essentially lacked atmosphere and passion (for the majority), JB's performance was the saving grace. :box:
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by n1ebf »

opticald wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
this much i figured out b4 the fight even took place. I guess people are exactly right about him. :TU:
:lol:

Still hurting from seeing Hunter quit AGAIN I see.

I don't know what your problem is with me. Is it because I rightfully predicted Hunter wasn't in Booths league? Or is it because I rightfully predicted Hunter would quit? You had lots to say about those predictions before the fight but of course you ended up looking like a mug after the fight. Pocketrocket has been on this forum and the SO forum and has a very good reputation mate. When people disagree and say Hunter QUIT in the Molitor and Booth fights, it doesn't make them idiots mate. It's called pragmatism. You have abused Hagler, rhino, pocketrocket and myself on this thread once your beloved Hunter was criticised. Out he went and quit again which is what we all knew was going to happen (money was made on the fight mate).

"Abused"??? :o I would have to go back and check the thread but I very much doubt it.

As has been PROVEN BY YOURSELF (I know you like capitals..) and BACKED UP BY RESPECTED Forum Members, you're not worth listening to....."mate"...

now if anybody wants to buddy up with you and mount a joint attack on me, well.....they can go right ahead and make w*nkers of themselves.

Bye Bye MUG NUMBER 000001 !
opticald
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by opticald »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
opticald wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
this much i figured out b4 the fight even took place. I guess people are exactly right about him. :TU:
:lol:

Still hurting from seeing Hunter quit AGAIN I see.

I don't know what your problem is with me. Is it because I rightfully predicted Hunter wasn't in Booths league? Or is it because I rightfully predicted Hunter would quit? You had lots to say about those predictions before the fight but of course you ended up looking like a mug after the fight. Pocketrocket has been on this forum and the SO forum and has a very good reputation mate. When people disagree and say Hunter QUIT in the Molitor and Booth fights, it doesn't make them idiots mate. It's called pragmatism. You have abused Hagler, rhino, pocketrocket and myself on this thread once your beloved Hunter was criticised. Out he went and quit again which is what we all knew was going to happen (money was made on the fight mate).

"Abused"??? :o I would have to go back and check the thread but I very much doubt it.

As has been PROVEN BY YOURSELF (I know you like capitals..) and BACKED UP BY RESPECTED Forum Members, you're not worth listening to....."mate"...

now if anybody wants to buddy up with you and mount a joint attack on me, well.....they can go right ahead and make w*nkers of themselves.

Bye Bye MUG NUMBER 000001 !
relax mate, your problem was that you took it too seriously from the start.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by rhino222 »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
As Opticald's chief supporter, this is unsurprising, you also have very deep undertones of disrespect. Your luxuriating from the comfort of your laptop comes across less as debate and more as ill-thought out, abusive tripe.
I am only speaking about what I've noticed on this particular thread mind you, as I haven't had cause to remember what you've been like in other threads.
if i were you i would be very careful mate, ive seen what pocketrocket brings to the party and in his 'cum on feel the noise' slade platform boots he registers a healthy 5ft2 on the tale of the tape...... :lol:
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by rhino222 »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Ahh...come in...I've been expecting you....bring your friend.....I'd have pulled his chicken wings off and dipped them in the Colonel's special sauce only I was consorting with some loose women elsewhere while that sh*tbucket of a show was taking place in Robin Hood country.......

Jason 2 Smooth Booth saved Nottingham's face this weekend with that scintillating performance, albeit against a now limited opposition (didn't I just learn it!!!). That boy can surely crack when he wants to.....for a show that essentially lacked atmosphere and passion (for the majority), JB's performance was the saving grace. :box:
you effin turncoat, not you are jerking booth off !! :oo you sell your soul very very cheaply !!
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by n1ebf »

.....edited

below. nebf
Last edited by n1ebf on 18 Oct 2009, 17:00, edited 1 time in total.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by n1ebf »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
rhino222 wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Ahh...come in...I've been expecting you....bring your friend.....I'd have pulled his chicken wings off and dipped them in the Colonel's special sauce only I was consorting with some loose women elsewhere while that sh*tbucket of a show was taking place in Robin Hood country.......

Jason 2 Smooth Booth saved Nottingham's face this weekend with that scintillating performance, albeit against a now limited opposition (didn't I just learn it!!!). That boy can surely crack when he wants to.....for a show that essentially lacked atmosphere and passion (for the majority), JB's performance was the saving grace. :box:
you effin turncoat, not you are jerking booth off !! :oo you sell your soul very very cheaply !!
.

I've been a Booth fan for about 3 years!!!!!!!!!

The thing is, due to regional, historical and other allegiances I'm more a Hunter fan than a Booth fan....

Do you view it as an impossibility that in an individual sport like boxing somebody could be a fan of BOTH fighters in a fight??

Having me point out the obvious to you does your credibility no good whatsoever. :roll:

Now stop MANIPULATING my posts to make your own arguments more convincing like some sh*tbag , not worth a dime politician.

Every post I've made in this thread has been 100% qualified by some form of reasoning (usually in depth), whether you agree or not, as have probably 90% of my posts since I joined Boxrec.

Extend me the same courtesy if you intend to debate, or if you're not intellectually up to it, don't waste my time

NOTE: post edited for the sake of keeping the peace :TU: :TU:

NOTE 2: it was a privelege, if not always a joy to be live at JB's beautiful display of guts and skill on Friday night, THE BEST OF LUCK TO THE LITTLE FELLA AS I MADE CLEAR AT THE SHOW WITH A FEW HUNDRED OTHERS AFTER THE FIGHT :box: :box: .
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by dondada »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:We learn, and move on.
:TU: :TU:
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by Hagler2002 »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:some real boll*cks in this thread too btw. :oops:
Pot, kettle, black :oops:
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Hunter primed for 2 Smooth

Post by n1ebf »

Hagler2002 wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:some real boll*cks in this thread too btw. :oops:
Pot, kettle, black :oops:
good to see the mansion's intact! Now don't necro-post and get up to date if you want to quote me :TU:
Post Reply