gary davies v ian napa

parryhook · Post by **parryhook** » 20 Oct 2009, 04:56

does the location favor either fighter- crowd support, biased judging??

leeharding · Post by **leeharding** » 20 Oct 2009, 09:45

Londonirish wrote:
neil hibbert wrote:
Des1 wrote:Another point I'll make is Napa's power is under estimated and his low stoppage percentage is decieving. I'm also sure Davies will be surprised at Napa's physical strength. One thing for sure, its going to be interesting. Young fresh hungry fighter V experianced cute skillfull.
he maybe strong but he wont be near as srong as gary especially when they have both had a good meal and plenty of fluids, i expect gary to prove the doubters wrong once again and show a certain boxing news writer that hes not keeping the belt warm for napa! 3 days to go!!!

Napa is much Stronger then his record show's thats without a Doubt.. Davis is very strong but lets wait and see how strong he is against Napa when both of them has to make 8s6, i think coming down so much will take it out of him, thats why i dont think he should mix it with Napa, coz Napa will Stop him, he fought Barrington Brown at a weight that he didnt struggle and drain him self to make the weight i think he was put over a few times in that fight fight?? Barrington Brown is also not a Puncher, Rocky Dean aint a puncher either and we know what happened when Davis fought him.. If Davis gets on his Boxing, use his height etc do what the Frence kid done which wont make a nice fight to watch but then i see him nicking it not by much tho as Napa is so up for this one.. Davis Will NOT stop him, if not i see Napa schooling him.. IMO

just to let u no martin garys hit 8st 7 today mate weight is no problem as u no in the edmonds fight he was alot stronger at bantam this weight is garys ideal weight its his fighting weight i understand what your saying martin but if your basing your conclusion well some of it on being drained at the weight DONT because garys flying mate and is WELL up 4 this one but dont expect it 2 be a toe 2 toe war coz it wont either way mate i think were in for a good fight when you out next martin ????

leeharding · Post by **leeharding** » 20 Oct 2009, 14:47

parryhook wrote:does the location favor either fighter- crowd support, biased judging??

hopefully theres no biased judging either way and ide say the location bvest suits gary theres a load of us going for this should be fun cheers

neil hibbert · Post by **neil hibbert** » 20 Oct 2009, 15:01

3 days 2 go cant wait!!!

TheGoods · Post by **TheGoods** » 21 Oct 2009, 07:04

Cracking little fight this and one I have been umm-ing and ahh-ing about for some time. Not seen a great deal of Davies but seen plenty of Napa (good friend and former England team-mate of a good pal of mine Ian Cooper). Skill wise I struggle to see how Davies can top the 'Dappa' One. Napa didn't look himself last time out but basically knows if he loses this he has nowhere to go. He's fine at the weight but can we say the same about Gary? As Mickey Hunter showed last week there's a difference between being able to make weight and being able to box effectively at the weight. Am leaning towards Napa to put on a show here against a raw, inexperienced opponent. 13/8 Napa on points looks the bet to me. But as you gentleman know... it's not beyond the realms of possibility that I may tip up a turkey here

leeharding · Post by **leeharding** » 21 Oct 2009, 15:23

TheGoods wrote:Cracking little fight this and one I have been umm-ing and ahh-ing about for some time. Not seen a great deal of Davies but seen plenty of Napa (good friend and former England team-mate of a good pal of mine Ian Cooper). Skill wise I struggle to see how Davies can top the 'Dappa' One. Napa didn't look himself last time out but basically knows if he loses this he has nowhere to go. He's fine at the weight but can we say the same about Gary? As Mickey Hunter showed last week there's a difference between being able to make weight and being able to box effectively at the weight. Am leaning towards Napa to put on a show here against a raw, inexperienced opponent. 13/8 Napa on points looks the bet to me. But as you gentleman know... it's not beyond the realms of possibility that I may tip up a turkey here

very fair post that mate once again ill say look at the edmonds fight championship weight gary won 7 tko and had loads in the tank so i understand what your saying mate i do but cancel that out it seems alot of people are thinking garys going to be weight drained he really isnt hes at championship weight now ready to go and really looking forward to it cant wait2 days to go cheers

leeharding · Post by **leeharding** » 21 Oct 2009, 15:30

leeharding wrote:
TheGoods wrote:Cracking little fight this and one I have been umm-ing and ahh-ing about for some time. Not seen a great deal of Davies but seen plenty of Napa (good friend and former England team-mate of a good pal of mine Ian Cooper). Skill wise I struggle to see how Davies can top the 'Dappa' One. Napa didn't look himself last time out but basically knows if he loses this he has nowhere to go. He's fine at the weight but can we say the same about Gary? As Mickey Hunter showed last week there's a difference between being able to make weight and being able to box effectively at the weight. Am leaning towards Napa to put on a show here against a raw, inexperienced opponent. 13/8 Napa on points looks the bet to me. But as you gentleman know... it's not beyond the realms of possibility that I may tip up a turkey here

Round By RoundNapa v Davies-British Bantamweight Title Bout 23 Oct 20:00Live on
Selection Price
Napa, Ian Round 1 80/1
Napa, Ian Round 2 66/1
Napa, Ian Round 3 50/1
Napa, Ian Round 4 40/1
Napa, Ian Round 5 33/1
Napa, Ian Round 6 33/1
Napa, Ian Round 7 33/1
Napa, Ian Round 8 33/1
Napa, Ian Round 9 25/1
Napa, Ian Round 10 25/1
Napa, Ian Round 11 25/1
Napa, Ian Round 12 33/1
Napa, Ian On Points 6/4
Davies, Gary Round 1 40/1
Davies, Gary Round 2 33/1
Davies, Gary Round 3 33/1
Davies, Gary Round 4 33/1
Davies, Gary Round 5 33/1
Davies, Gary Round 6 28/1
Davies, Gary Round 7 25/1
Davies, Gary Round 8 25/1
Davies, Gary Round 9 25/1
Davies, Gary Round 10 25/1
Davies, Gary Round 11 25/1
Davies, Gary Round 12 28/1
Davies, Gary On Points 9/4
Draw 16/1
1 more bets Fight Prices

Tick the checkbox next to a price to move that selection to betting slip.

this is stan james bookies this is how they have it can anyone elaberate best odds best knockout 2 win im nooooooooo goood at understanding all this aswell it had ian napa 4/5 gary davies evs anyone no what thats all about cheers

mickey1975 · Post by **mickey1975** » 21 Oct 2009, 15:44

it basically means they have it as a 50/50 fight

leeharding · Post by **leeharding** » 21 Oct 2009, 15:53

mickey1975 wrote:it basically means they have it as a 50/50 fight

ok mate cheers for that stupid with bookies bets avnt a clue thanks

Londonirish · Post by **Londonirish** » 21 Oct 2009, 16:15

Any round for example thats 33/1 means you put on a tenner you get back £330 plus your tenner. Napa to win on points 6/4 means for every £4 you put on you get £6 back plus the £4. Davis on points 9/4, if you put a tenner on you get back £22.50 plus the tenner...

leeharding · Post by **leeharding** » 21 Oct 2009, 16:19

Londonirish wrote:Any round for example thats 33/1 means you put on a tenner you get back £330 plus your tenner. Napa to win on points 6/4 means for every £4 you put on you get £6 back plus the £4. Davis on points 9/4, if you put a tenner on you get back £22.50 plus the tenner...

so is napa favourite martin ye and by alot m8 thanks lad lee

Londonirish · Post by **Londonirish** » 21 Oct 2009, 17:10

leeharding wrote:
Londonirish wrote:Any round for example thats 33/1 means you put on a tenner you get back £330 plus your tenner. Napa to win on points 6/4 means for every £4 you put on you get £6 back plus the £4. Davis on points 9/4, if you put a tenner on you get back £22.50 plus the tenner...
so is napa favourite martin ye and by alot m8 thanks lad lee

With Paddy Power Napa is slight Fav he is 4/5 on and have Davis at Evens...
There aint got up the Rounds or Points betting yet...

Des1 · Post by **Des1** » 23 Oct 2009, 19:44

Napa had too much experiance, and at this time too much ability. I bet Davies was suprised at Napa's physical strength...People shouldn't look at this guys record and take his strength for granted!

But Davies will learn from this, he will improve by having mixed it with a master boxer over championship rounds. He will come again.

leeharding · Post by **leeharding** » 23 Oct 2009, 19:48

Des1 wrote:Napa had too much experiance, and at this time too much ability. I bet Davies was suprised at Napa's physical strength...People shouldn't look at this guys record and take his strength for granted!

But Davies will learn from this, he will improve by having mixed it with a master boxer over championship rounds. He will come again.

they showed 4 rounds on sky not being biased mate because was very close fight but not enough to take a champions belt a load of bollocks imo even sky commentaters said it wasnt enough to take a champiuons title but we will see and he was right get the full fight and watch it then come again plz gd fight tho

Des1 · Post by **Des1** » 23 Oct 2009, 19:57

leeharding wrote:
Des1 wrote:Napa had too much experiance, and at this time too much ability. I bet Davies was suprised at Napa's physical strength...People shouldn't look at this guys record and take his strength for granted!

But Davies will learn from this, he will improve by having mixed it with a master boxer over championship rounds. He will come again.
they showed 4 rounds on sky not being biased mate because was very close fight but not enough to take a champions belt a load of bollocks imo even sky commentaters said it wasnt enough to take a champiuons title but we will see and he was right get the full fight and watch it then come again plz gd fight tho

Ok, I gatherd the rounds they showed was the story of the fight...yes, shouldn't assume that in hindsight. Didn't really catch the commentry, shame full fight wasn't shown. Either way Im sure it was a good learning fight for Davies, giving him more experiance and Im sure he'll be champ again.

MPG · Post by **MPG** » 24 Oct 2009, 08:52

leeharding wrote:
Des1 wrote:Napa had too much experiance, and at this time too much ability. I bet Davies was suprised at Napa's physical strength...People shouldn't look at this guys record and take his strength for granted!

But Davies will learn from this, he will improve by having mixed it with a master boxer over championship rounds. He will come again.
they showed 4 rounds on sky
not being biased mate
because was very close fight but not enough to take a champions belt a load of bollocks imo even sky commentaters said it wasnt enough to take a champiuons title but we will see and he was right get the full fight and watch it then come again plz gd fight tho

Thats an understatement,you have always been bias,but its your brother so i wouldn't expect anything different.
Ian Napa was just too experience for Davies,but i'm sure Davies can always come back.
Happy to see that Napa aint quite finish yet.

Tommy Gunn13 · Post by **Tommy Gunn13** » 24 Oct 2009, 09:05

if Jason Booth came down in weight,he would beat both theses with ease

ashley-sexton · Post by **ashley-sexton** » 24 Oct 2009, 10:37

i thought that ian nappa looked very good last night teeing off on davis and in the last 2rounds i thought that he might stop him and looked the bigger puncher!great fight to watch!would be a good return!

leeharding · Post by **leeharding** » 24 Oct 2009, 10:50

ashley-sexton wrote:i thought that ian nappa looked very good last night teeing off on davis and in the last 2rounds i thought that he might stop him and looked the bigger puncher!great fight to watch!would be a good return!

like is said mate get the full fight steve wood whent over to garys corner at end of round 10 and told peter garys one round up so dont no how they had it 116/112 but gary will come again it was in the contract for a return anyway against napa so bring on davies vs napa 2 if anyone finds wer 2 get the full fight could u let me no cheers

neil hibbert · Post by **neil hibbert** » 24 Oct 2009, 12:17

majority of people rngside had gary winning the fight by 2 which is what i had it but seen the punch stats and theres no way ary only landed 82 times, not going to complain because garys happy with his performance and considering what happend tue which i wont bother going into he got the full 12 out and thought he won the fight.fair play to napa though and well done

leeharding · Post by **leeharding** » 24 Oct 2009, 12:54

neil hibbert wrote:majority of people rngside had gary winning the fight by 2 which is what i had it but seen the punch stats and theres no way ary only landed 82 times, not going to complain because garys happy with his performance and considering what happend tue which i wont bother going into he got the full 12 out and thought he won the fight.fair play to napa though and well done

same here well done napa

Londonirish · Post by **Londonirish** » 24 Oct 2009, 13:46

leeharding wrote:
ashley-sexton wrote:i thought that ian nappa looked very good last night teeing off on davis and in the last 2rounds i thought that he might stop him and looked the bigger puncher!great fight to watch!would be a good return!
like is said mate get the full fight steve wood whent over to garys corner at end of round 10 and told peter garys one round up so dont no how they had it 116/112 but gary will come again it was in the contract for a return anyway against napa so bring on davies vs napa 2 if anyone finds wer 2 get the full fight could u let me no cheers

He was there sitting Ringside...
From what i saw i thought Napa boxed well landing the Classier and Harder Shots, he's defence it just so Good and even when he was getting Hit with Big shots the way he moves with it makes it look like the Shot was'nt as hard as it was.. I def understand from what your saying with TV not showing the whole Fight but from what they did Napa showed his Experience and Class Show,
Especially in the 11th

Davis Has done Great to come from No where and do what he has done.

If Napa was a Puncher He'd be Unstoppable

neil hibbert · Post by **neil hibbert** » 24 Oct 2009, 13:59

He was there sitting Ringside...
From what i saw i thought Napa boxed well landing the Classier and Harder Shots, he's defence it just so Good and even when he was getting Hit with Big shots the way he moves with it makes it look like the Shot was'nt as hard as it was.. I def understand from what your saying with TV not showing the whole Fight but from what they did Napa showed his Experience and Class Show,
Especially in the 11th

Davis Has done Great to come from No where and do what he has done.

If Napa was a Puncher He'd be Unstoppable

[/quote]
yer deffo agree with you there martin hed be unstoppable, if i thought gary had been beaten id of posted up and be honest but i really think he won it and ive had numerous msgs off boxing people and conversations with them and they all said they had gary winning and thats the frustrating part but at least he wasnt outclassed like some people were predicting

15829 · Post by **15829** » 24 Oct 2009, 14:06

was a more entertaing fight than i was expecting was a really close fight davies done well considering it was the first time past 7, i thought a draw would of been a fair result

leeharding · Post by **leeharding** » 24 Oct 2009, 21:45

diggler wrote:was a more entertaing fight than i was expecting was a really close fight davies done well considering it was the first time past 7, i thought a draw would of been a fair result

true mate no way should he have lost that belt mate but he did and whats done is done im certain now tho gary is up there 2 mix it wioth the lads at the top of the domestic seen and only had 13 fights frank maloney was discusting the way he just fucked gary off and was up napas ass ide say he is a pudendum imo for doing that and napa didnt show gary one bit of respect after the fight wich i 2 thought was discusting but hay its boxing enjoyed last night cant wait for the next one thanks lads

gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa

Re: gary davies v ian napa