Moore & Rhodes

Who wins...

Moore KO
75
62%
Moore Pts
19
16%
Rhodes KO
16
13%
Rhodes pts
10
8%
Draw
1
1%
 
Total votes: 121

dbflex
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 870
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 12:53

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by dbflex »

Spiker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 591
Joined: 15 Mar 2008, 14:24

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Spiker »

Rhodes in 5 for me.
He is still quick enough not to let Moore crawl all over him.
I can see more giving him a few nasty moments but ryan will give it some angles :bag:
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Chambers2 »

opticald wrote:Rhodes was beaten clearly by Lockett so if Moore is going anywhere he should be handling the likes of Rhodes.
STYLES MAKE FIGHTS

I reckon the Manchester Mauler takes a clear UD
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6630
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by THEBUTCH »

Moore via stoppage.
beagleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 14:31

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by beagleboy »

I can see Rhodes' corner pulling him out - let's hope it's not before the fight.

:geek:
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by whicker »

It's a hard one to call. Rhodes had a brilliant win against Woolcoombe, and two competent wins against Coyle and Vuma.

If Rhodes can find the right punch, he may have this by a KO.

Thats what I'm going for. Can get 5-1 on that.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Horse »

whicker wrote:It's a hard one to call. Rhodes had a brilliant win against Woolcoombe, and two competent wins against Coyle and Vuma.
Can his win against Woolcombe really be called brilliant? Woolcombe was a rather weak British champion.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by whicker »

Horse wrote:
whicker wrote:It's a hard one to call. Rhodes had a brilliant win against Woolcoombe, and two competent wins against Coyle and Vuma.
Can his win against Woolcombe really be called brilliant? Woolcombe was a rather weak British champion.
I'd say so, because it was such a comprehensive KO.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by twenty six »

You are a sad sad man Beagleboy.
Love and Best Wishes,

From the De Vere Hotel, Reebok Stadium.
The team's been here since yesterday morning.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Poncey »

As much as I like both fighters, gotta be J-Mo. Feels like he has more momentum. This, to me, feels like the biggest UK fight since Benn v Eubank 2.

I've already gone through 2 pairs of pants.

I'm gutted I can't go.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by whicker »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:As much as I like both fighters, gotta be J-Mo. Feels like he has more momentum. This, to me, feels like the biggest UK fight since Benn v Eubank 2.

I've already gone through 2 pairs of pants.

I'm gutted I can't go.
I'm certainly looking forward to it, thats for sure.

However, in all honesty I can't say it comes close to Benn Eubank II. Benn and Eubank were such characters, and at the time of their fight, both proven champions at world level.




(I know you weren't actually saying that the fight was the same magnitude, but it's a handy comparisson.)
fatman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 206
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 05:16

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by fatman »

total mismatch for me.

Moore will destroy him early. too powerful and in his prime, Moore is World Title contender, Rhodes is past his best.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Wales »

whicker wrote:
Horse wrote:
whicker wrote:It's a hard one to call. Rhodes had a brilliant win against Woolcoombe, and two competent wins against Coyle and Vuma.
Can his win against Woolcombe really be called brilliant? Woolcombe was a rather weak British champion.
I'd say so, because it was such a comprehensive KO.
I thought Rhodes was terrible against Jamie Coyle, awful.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Autobarn »

Moore will batter him then eat him.

I can't see what Rhodes can do one Moroe has found his range.

Serious opportunity for both men, so I can't see Moore being less than at his best. (Unless there are injuries or weight problems or some problem.)

You aren't going to beat Moore with that pickpocket style, not going to keep him off for 12 rds...
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Gazmac81 »

Rhodes battered Coyle for a good few rounds but coyle soaked it up

Possibly Rhodes will win first few rounds tonight and then Moore take over

However Rhodes is being seriously Written off here and i think that is a bit harsh

Moore has been beat and down before but seems to be on form

i reckon it will be a good tough fight between 2 of the Nice Guys in boxing. :box:







I'd say so, because it was such a comprehensive KO.[/quote]

I thought Rhodes was terrible against Jamie Coyle, awful.[/quote]
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Autobarn »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:As much as I like both fighters, gotta be J-Mo. Feels like he has more momentum. This, to me, feels like the biggest UK fight since Benn v Eubank 2.

I've already gone through 2 pairs of pants.

I'm gutted I can't go.
haye v mucca in big arena for 3 world titles?

i would say moore v rhodes is more of a good "trade" fight which will likely have good loyal/local following, as well as decent implications for the winner.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Wales »

Gazmac81 wrote:Rhodes battered Coyle for a good few rounds but coyle soaked it up
For about 5 rounds rhodes looked good, then he faded out fo the fight. But lets be fair, Coyle isnt even british title level, and has been KO'd with consumate ease on more than one occassion before and after rhodes.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

I can see Ryan Rhodes winning this on points. He had his mid career hiccup but I think he will have too much movement and
variety for Jamie Moore.

Jamie Moore is a good fighter but he is just that level below true world class. It will be a good one I reckon. :TU:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Autobarn »

Carlos-Wigan wrote:I can see Ryan Rhodes winning this on points. He had his mid career hiccup but I think he will have too much movement and
variety for Jamie Moore.

Jamie Moore is a good fighter but he is just that level below true world class. It will be a good one I reckon. :TU:
rhodes may have hiccups, but moore's body punching will give him indigestion.

bad luck for winner?

pavlik v williams off, probably for good. sergio martinez offers to step in for Pav. williams beats martinez? down at light middle? absolute hardest fight out there, if winner wants to fight for WBC title...
Last edited by Autobarn on 23 Oct 2009, 07:40, edited 1 time in total.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Wales »

Bold statement putting Ryan Rhodes at "true world class" .
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

Wales wrote:Bold statement putting Ryan Rhodes at "true world class" .
Nah, I didn't say that. Rhodes is at the same level but his style will be perfect for Moore - just a personal opinion
and I may be wrong tomorrow. :TU:
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

Autobarn wrote:
Carlos-Wigan wrote:I can see Ryan Rhodes winning this on points. He had his mid career hiccup but I think he will have too much movement and
variety for Jamie Moore.

Jamie Moore is a good fighter but he is just that level below true world class. It will be a good one I reckon. :TU:
rhodes may have hiccups, but moore's body punching will give him indigestion.

bad luck for winner?

pavlik v williams off, probably for good. sergio martinez offers to step in for Pav. williams beats martinez? down at light middle? absolute hardest fight out there, if winner wants to fight for WBC title...
Yeah, whoever wins, it is going to be a tough one to actually win the WBC belt and to keep it. Whoever wins tonight certainly deserves their chance which is the main thing.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Wales »

Carlos-Wigan wrote:
Wales wrote:Bold statement putting Ryan Rhodes at "true world class" .
Nah, I didn't say that. Rhodes is at the same level but his style will be perfect for Moore - just a personal opinion
and I may be wrong tomorrow. :TU:

:TU:
Cotteyroo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16
Joined: 18 Oct 2009, 14:10

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by Cotteyroo »

Moore will ko him looking forward to the fight though hopefully he will fight Sergio Martinez instead of Julio Cesar Chaves Jr that was rumuored. Moore will be a world champion this time next year :bag:
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Re: Moore & Rhodes

Post by big lennox »

I've thought about it long and hard and can't see any other outcome than a rhodes stoppage win. I think Moores style is perfect for him
Post Reply