OT: BNP

el_grande_mauro_mina · Post by **el_grande_mauro_mina** » 27 Oct 2009, 07:01

http://www.nsopw.gov/Core/ResultDetails ... 001813F07F

Lenny · Post by **Lenny** » 27 Oct 2009, 07:13

Shortland Street website and now a National Sex Offender Public Website

You gotta start getting out more Carlos

el_grande_mauro_mina · Post by **el_grande_mauro_mina** » 27 Oct 2009, 07:18

Lenny wrote:Shortland Street website and now a National Sex Offender Public Website

You gotta start getting out more Carlos

I blame my location - I am getting cabin fever!

Adamj1987 · Post by **Adamj1987** » 27 Oct 2009, 07:52

[quote="Terry D"]Griffin has a nerve going after the kipper splitters, his surname is taken from a bird, so he is half-man half-women, therefore he is gay.

Ancient Greek culture relegated everyone to the class of second-class citizen. Greek men were the top of the chain and slaves, women etc were down the bottom, pardon the pun. Aristotle wrote that women 'are vessels for the seed of man' -- that is biology, you cannot argue against it.

The men would gather for drinking parties, symposiums, and discuss things whilst getting blind drunk, they saw themselves as the physical and mental pinnacle and, as all drunken nights do, they ended things with a bit of 'how's your father's father'. The young boys, or older men, were for play, the woman was for procreation. Look at their art. Lots of sculptures of men as they saw the male form as the pinnacle of creation.

They weren't gay, there was no word for gay at that time, they had a totally different mind set. In those days this debate would have taken place during a drinking party. We'd discuss the plebs (the BNP), get drunk and all bugger each other rotten. I'll give that part a miss though, no offence guys.

I've got nowt against gays, literally, I won't go near them in case I catch gayness from them. With that said, I'm sympathetic to the odd outbreak of 'accidental gayness'. It is a new strand of battyboyness, I made it up myself, anyone want to hear about it?[/quote]
only if its entertaining

Adamj1987 · Post by **Adamj1987** » 27 Oct 2009, 07:57

Terry D wrote: The practice or the explication?

the explination

Counter-puncher · Post by **Counter-puncher** » 27 Oct 2009, 07:59

what racist and white supremacist ideology does not seem to appreciate is, that mixed race children can often be really goodlooking. if that fact alone doesn't serve to argue against them, I don't know what does...

Asterix · Post by **Asterix** » 27 Oct 2009, 08:22

Counter-puncher wrote:what racist and white supremacist ideology does not seem to appreciate is, that mixed race children can often be really goodlooking. if that fact alone doesn't serve to argue against them, I don't know what does...

Making 'good looking' into a single word makes me think of Zoolander.

On the train last night there was a Mum (who sounded like she originally came from Africa but looked like she came from Brazil) with her two kids. Her kids were really polite, saying pardon and thank you, and generally speaking really nicely to each other. They had, what I would call, perfect English accents. It made me smile.

I'm completely for mixing races.

doctorboxing · Post by **doctorboxing** » 27 Oct 2009, 08:23

So Mr.Griffin is against black people and homosexuality is he?

Well lets put him to a test - he stands in front of the nation whilst Beyonce and Rihanna go at it in 69. If he gets an erection then he is proved to be a sham.

I see no flaw in my plan

el_grande_mauro_mina · Post by **el_grande_mauro_mina** » 27 Oct 2009, 08:42

doctorboxing wrote:So Mr.Griffin is against black people and homosexuality is he?

Well lets put him to a test - he stands in front of the nation whilst Beyonce and Rihanna go at it in 69. If he gets an erection then he is proved to be a sham.

I'm getting one thinking of it now..

Poncey · Post by **Poncey** » 27 Oct 2009, 09:04

Anyone know the story behind his Action Man eye?

Does he have a switch on the back of his head to move it?

banjo · Post by **banjo** » 27 Oct 2009, 09:08

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Anyone know the story behind his Action Man eye?

Does he have a switch on the back of his head to move it?

He threw a shotgun cartridge onto a fire which went off and took his eye out.

Shame it didn't take his head off with it.

Adamj1987 · Post by **Adamj1987** » 27 Oct 2009, 09:09

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Anyone know the story behind his Action Man eye?

Does he have a switch on the back of his head to move it?

i think he was hit by a shotgun pellet (obviuously not direct)

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 27 Oct 2009, 09:13

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Anyone know the story behind his Action Man eye?

Does he have a switch on the back of his head to move it?

One of 'em was brown and one was blue, he plucked out the brown one for being 'racially impure.'

el_grande_mauro_mina · Post by **el_grande_mauro_mina** » 27 Oct 2009, 09:25

banjo wrote:
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Anyone know the story behind his Action Man eye?

Does he have a switch on the back of his head to move it?
He threw a shotgun cartridge onto a fire which went off and took his eye out.

Shame it didn't take his head off with it.

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 27 Oct 2009, 09:25

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Anyone know the story behind his Action Man eye?

Does he have a switch on the back of his head to move it?

Are Disney in on this as well??

Adamj1987 · Post by **Adamj1987** » 27 Oct 2009, 09:26

Old bones Ian wrote:
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Anyone know the story behind his Action Man eye?

Does he have a switch on the back of his head to move it?
Are Disney in on this as well??

gman tilz · Post by **gman tilz** » 27 Oct 2009, 13:13

the man has an opinion and feels strongly about it, whats the shame in that? at least he has the balls and guts to put himself in the firing line for what he believes in!
a lot of us keep our opinions to ourselves but so what! he hasnt!

Mensa07 · Post by **Mensa07** » 27 Oct 2009, 13:34

I think the anti-fascists (with their fascist tactics), the other parties and the anti-Griffin public are missing the point. Shutting the BNP out, ridiculing Griffin and coming across very much holier than thou aren't the solution to the problem. Thats just putting your hands over your ears and going la la la I can't hear you...

If the BNP are pulling in a million voters, they need to analyse why. What is it the BNP are offering that the main parties aren't? What can we do to offer these voters an alternative?

But they won't. They'll pay for it tho in the general election, the BNP will show growth there too.

banjo · Post by **banjo** » 27 Oct 2009, 13:40

Mensa07 wrote:I think the anti-fascists (with their fascist tactics), the other parties and the anti-Griffin public are missing the point. Shutting the BNP out, ridiculing Griffin and coming across very much holier than thou aren't the solution to the problem. Thats just putting your hands over your ears and going la la la I can't hear you...

Indeed.

I've been saying that all of this won't solve the problem for a while now, possibly time to start using some of the good ol' semtex under their cars.

tonyevs · Post by **tonyevs** » 27 Oct 2009, 13:54

Livingstone Cole wrote:
tonyevs wrote:
sg1985 wrote:
Why are men supposed to put their 'donga's' up women's 'fanny's'? Who says so? Who made that up? Why is that more normal? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years just like heterosexuality.

Why do men put their `dongas` up womens `fannys`? who made that up you ask? Evolution .. thats how our species continues and advances. If we were meant to do it your way them wouldn`t men be shitting babies out by now?

I don`t argue that homosexuality has been around for thousands of years. But put simply, it isn`t what we were designed for as a species.

I got nothing against gays. Each to their own.

Funny you mention Evolution, then say it's not what we were 'designed' for.
There actually is many plausible theories surrounding evolutionary advantages in homosexuality, kin selection theory being one of the most prominent.

And would you like to explain how this is adaptable to evolution? maybe extinction ..

When was a male ever made pregnant. Or a female without any male assistance?

Srebmun · Post by **Srebmun** » 27 Oct 2009, 14:00

gman tilz wrote:the man has an opinion and feels strongly about it, whats the shame in that? at least he has the balls and guts to put himself in the firing line for what he believes in!
a lot of us keep our opinions to ourselves but so what! he hasnt!

The shame is he's a bigot and racist and his beliefs have no place in today's society.

m1kee50 · Post by **m1kee50** » 27 Oct 2009, 14:02

banjo wrote:
Mensa07 wrote:I think the anti-fascists (with their fascist tactics), the other parties and the anti-Griffin public are missing the point. Shutting the BNP out, ridiculing Griffin and coming across very much holier than thou aren't the solution to the problem. Thats just putting your hands over your ears and going la la la I can't hear you...
Indeed.

I've been saying that all of this won't solve the problem for a while now, possibly time to start using some of the good ol' semtex under their cars.

let me know

Poncey · Post by **Poncey** » 27 Oct 2009, 14:38

Still makes me laugh
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... paign.html

m1kee50 · Post by **m1kee50** » 28 Oct 2009, 02:12

Terry D wrote:Absolutist views, a skewed moral perspective, the inability to allow others their viewpoint or discourse and faces that are contorted with rage and hate -- these anti-fascist protestors really need to scrub up their image.

I agree that a lot of the ire has given the BNP a boost but that misses the entire point of this thread, which is focussed on the fact that this Nick geezer looks likes a gimp, talks like a tit (not a big bouncy one either, kind of a saggy much too much, much too young burst yolk type of tit) and is he also a massive argument for eugenics.

He wouldn't have made it into the SS thats for sure.

m1kee50 · Post by **m1kee50** » 20 Nov 2009, 01:49

sg1985 wrote:
tonyevs wrote:[
And would you like to explain how this is adaptable to evolution? maybe extinction ..
When was a male ever made pregnant. Or a female without any male assistance?
There is a few on the board who could probably answer that much better than most.

the fairytale brigade

Griffin is not turning Barking into a BNP seat, either.

OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP

Re: OT: BNP