Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
this is smiths first test think he'll come through it with, this will test his power as ramogoadi has only been stopped by murray, mitchell and twice by Tseveenpurev good to see warren moving him along quicker than he normally does. i think smith between 5-6
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
Turning out to be a great card with decent tests for our prospects.
-
boxingchat
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1934
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
Ramogoadi is out!
Smith is fighting Gavin Reid.
Smith is fighting Gavin Reid.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
shame about Ramogoadi reid will still be a decent test
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
alot better prospect's out there in my opinionEmerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
nah there are alot of really good prospect out there but groves and smith are the 2 oustanding ones, smith is gonna go all the waygemmell wrote:alot better prospect's out there in my opinionEmerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
i hope your right. think groves and frankie gavin are the best prospects.well there are so many good prospects in britain at the minute. hope swifty show's me how good he really is on fridaydiggler wrote:nah there are alot of really good prospect out there but groves and smith are the 2 oustanding ones, smith is gonna go all the waygemmell wrote:alot better prospect's out there in my opinionEmerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
Best Prospect out of the lot :PEmerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
way way better my arse. you say groves looks average at best!! you sure you dont need glasses mate?teddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video'steddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
Yep thats massive justification for him not being a better prospect than Grooves, I stand corrected.....D!ckgemmell wrote:if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video'steddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
I wouldnt read anything into that gemmell - look who his promoter is - Wazza doesnt like to see his fighters fights publicised via the free web. Take it from someone who has seen Swifty box live a few times: the lad has all the skills and power to boot. A class actgemmell wrote:if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video'steddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
i didnt say he isn't good i have seen him a few times on friday fight night. i knw he has the skills.but that arshole teddy said smith is way way better then groves and that groves is average.nearly all of wazza's fighters are on youtubeTerribleTerry wrote:I wouldnt read anything into that gemmell - look who his promoter is - Wazza doesnt like to see his fighters fights publicised via the free web. Take it from someone who has seen Swifty box live a few times: the lad has all the skills and power to boot. A class actgemmell wrote:if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video'steddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
"i didnt say he isn't good i have seen him a few times on friday fight night. i knw he has the skills.but that arshole teddy said smith is way way better then groves and that groves is average.nearly all of wazza's fighters are on youtube"
Groves is an over-rated prospect imo....do u no what imo means?
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
did i say he wasn't a better prospect? i dont think he is but i didnt say that. you fukin mong.im not claiming that's justification but surely if he was a class act warren would have his fights on franks youtube page.i've seen him a few times on friday fight night's and he is impressive but groves has looked just as impressive and for you to say george is average what does that make degale.jeffries.dickinson all the other smw and lhw prospects thn? he by far looks the best of the bunch."ste smith is way way better"teddy007 wrote:Yep thats massive justification for him not being a better prospect than Grooves, I stand corrected.....D!ckgemmell wrote:if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video'steddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
no i dont actuallyteddy007 wrote:"i didnt say he isn't good i have seen him a few times on friday fight night. i knw he has the skills.but that arshole teddy said smith is way way better then groves and that groves is average.nearly all of wazza's fighters are on youtube"
Groves is an over-rated prospect imo....do u no what imo means?
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
Gemmell...i'm not getting into an argument with, through fear of being banned, so get f*cked.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
ok teddy bearteddy007 wrote:Gemmell...i'm not getting into an argument with, through fear of being banned, so get f*cked.
-
leeharding
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 589
- Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 16:18
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
dont think thats got anything at all to do with it stes a friend of mine he no,s wer he wants to go and what he can do i think he will go all the way but because he dont have videos on youtubes got f all to do with how big a prospect he is thats a load of bull 2 be onnest ian napa is british champ no fight videos so explain that onegemmell wrote:if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video'steddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
Shame Ramogoadi pulled out that would be a good tester for Swifty, Swifty should beat Reid imo 
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
Gemmell, you sure you've seen Swifty on FFN? I've only ever spotted him on it once.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
yeh i understand what your saying BUT if wazza thinks he will be great then why dosn't he put his fights up? he does with the olympians and other prospects. i think the lad's a good prospectleeharding wrote:dont think thats got anything at all to do with it stes a friend of mine he no,s wer he wants to go and what he can do i think he will go all the way but because he dont have videos on youtubes got f all to do with how big a prospect he is thats a load of bull 2 be onnest ian napa is british champ no fight videos so explain that onegemmell wrote:if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video'steddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.
Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi
yeh i have definitely seen him.need to see more of him tho. not sure wether it's once or twice ive seen the kidjBacca wrote:Gemmell, you sure you've seen Swifty on FFN? I've only ever spotted him on it once.