Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Goodnight, Irene · Post by **Goodnight, Irene** » 29 Oct 2009, 10:46

You're not a Tyson fan? Who are you kidding?

You're a fair-dinkum worshipper

TigerMoth · Post by **TigerMoth** » 29 Oct 2009, 10:55

[quote="ThatOne"]?[/quote]

Ridiculous to say In His Prime - Mike Tyson's prime ended the moment he hooked up with Don King and his band of incompetents!!

Goodnight, Irene · Post by **Goodnight, Irene** » 29 Oct 2009, 10:56

TigerMoth wrote:
ThatOne wrote:?
Ridiculous to say In His Prime - Mike Tyson's prime ended the moment he hooked up with Don King and his band of incompetents!!

Classic revisionist BS to save Tyson face after losing to Douglas...

chiricahua · Post by **chiricahua** » 29 Oct 2009, 11:11

Goodnight, Irene wrote:You're not a Tyson fan? Who are you kidding?

You're a fair-dinkum worshipper

It is a shame that you confuse a person who defends Cus D'Amato style with Tyson.Keep going in your blind faith.

Classic revisionist BS to save Tyson face after losing to Douglas...

Jack Newfield is a revisionist?Bert Goldman is a revisionist?I can give you more examples.

Wrong again.You are the one ignoring historical facts.It is a fact that Tyson didn't train for that fight and it is a fact for the few who understand Cus D'Amato style that Tyson became very vulnerable after Rooney.
Next you are going to say that Teddy Atlas is a Tyson fan,cause he is one of the persons who says the same.

Goodnight, Irene · Post by **Goodnight, Irene** » 29 Oct 2009, 11:14

Being a lazy prick is not the same as being past your prime.

This fanciful BS that Tyson's prime ended in 1988 has gained a wretched foothold has got to be put to the sword.

I've asked in the past different people who spout this stuff to show me an article from the day which suggested (much less claimed, outright) Tyson's peak had past, published 1989-90.

It's a myth, perpetuated by Tyson fanatics like yourself. Being lazy does not equate to being past your prime.

chiricahua · Post by **chiricahua** » 29 Oct 2009, 11:21

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Being a lazy prick is not the same as being past your prime.

This fanciful BS that Tyson's prime ended in 1988 has gained a wretched foothold has got to be put to the sword.

I've asked in the past different people who spout this stuff to show me an article from the day which suggested (much less claimed, outright) Tyson's peak had past, published 1989-90.

It's a myth, perpetuated by Tyson fanatics like yourself. Being lazy does not equate to being past your prime.

It seems you aren't bright to understand that i'm not a Tyson fanatic. 8)
It isn't about being lazy,it is about not training at all,at this level if you don't train seriously you will lose in every sport.
If Roger federer doesn't train he will lose against a top 20 player,sports work this way.
It seems that you are also highly uneducated about this period.
Jack Newfield made several articles stating this fact.
Teddy Atlas another Tyson fanatic who was Jack's friend concurred,but if you are completely fanatical to see facts, it is your problem not mine.
Some of these articles are in Sports illustrated.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 29 Oct 2009, 11:23

Goodnight, Irene wrote:You're not a Tyson fan? Who are you kidding?

You're a fair-dinkum worshipper

He's right, Tyson has reasonable fans, he is a full blown googuzzler from the planet Tyson. We probably shouldn't pick on him. He types fairly well considering his obvious disabilities.

Mike's first prime ended at Douglas and then the second one ended against an older, used up Holyfield. I'm pretty sure those are the facts at hand.

Goodnight, Irene · Post by **Goodnight, Irene** » 29 Oct 2009, 11:25

Failing to train = being past your prime.

Only in the fantasy land of a Tyson fanatic.

PS - Is that the same Teddy Atlas who was acrimoniously fired for telling it to Tyson like it is?

chiricahua · Post by **chiricahua** » 29 Oct 2009, 11:27

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:You're not a Tyson fan? Who are you kidding?

You're a fair-dinkum worshipper

He's right, Tyson has reasonable fans, he is a full blown googuzzler from the planet Tyson. We probably shouldn't pick on him. He types fairly well considering his obvious disabilities.

Mike's first prime ended at Douglas and then the second one ended against an older, used up Holyfield. I'm pretty sure those are the facts at hand.

Pick on who?Oh about challenged people like you, Holyfield maniacs who live in planet Holyfield the steroid man who needed to use headbutts to have an edge in fights.

Everyone noticed that poor Holyfield was old,poor Holyfield was old when he failed to ko 42 years old Holmes or when he got knocked out by Bowe.
Love your brainless top 10 list,Holyfield in top 4.

Failing to train = being past your prime.

Only in the fantasy land of a Tyson fanatic.

If you don't know the difference between physical prime and lack of training,oh well.
Only in the fantasy land of a delusional boxing fan.

PS - Is that the same Teddy Atlas who was acrimoniously fired for telling it to Tyson like it is?

He got fired cos Tyson molested his niece.

i already explained what teddy said about Tyson post 88 and post prison,but if you prefer to selectively ignore what you like and what you don't like good luck,mr.biased fanboy.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 29 Oct 2009, 11:32

chiricahua wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:You're not a Tyson fan? Who are you kidding?

You're a fair-dinkum worshipper

He's right, Tyson has reasonable fans, he is a full blown googuzzler from the planet Tyson. We probably shouldn't pick on him. He types fairly well considering his obvious disabilities.

Mike's first prime ended at Douglas and then the second one ended against an older, used up Holyfield. I'm pretty sure those are the facts at hand.
Pick on who?Oh about challenged people like you, Holyfield maniacs who live in planet Holyfield the steroid man who needed to use headbutts to have an edge in fights.
Everyone noticed that poor Holyfield was old,poor Holyfield was old when he failed to ko 42 years old Holmes or when he got knocked out by Bowe.
Love your brainless top 10 list,Holyfield in top 4.

You sure get mighty emotional for being indifferent to Mike. Vintage nuthugger, straight out of the ballsuckling handbook.......

1. Adamantly deny being a fan- This one is easy, but fanatics like yourself can't follow after here.

2. Don't go into spastic convulsions of rage when others disagree about your messiah- you need work here.

3. Try to occasionally post about something other than the demigod- again, epic fail for you.

Don't feel bad, most obnoxious manlovers like yourself can't make it past rule 1.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 29 Oct 2009, 11:33

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Failing to train = being past your prime.

Only in the fantasy land of a Tyson fanatic.

PS - Is that the same Teddy Atlas who was acrimoniously fired for telling it to Tyson like it is?

Isn't it odd that Frank Bruno performed much better against unstoppable "prime" Tyson than he did against the decrepit old and shot Tyson that would soon be led to slaughter against holyfield?

Goodnight, Irene · Post by **Goodnight, Irene** » 29 Oct 2009, 11:41

Didn't you hear?

23-year-old Mike Tyson, Heavyweight champ & approx, what, 35, 36-0 was past it already when he first fought Bruno. That's why he struggled to some extent...

yiddo14 · Post by **yiddo14** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:06

I think there is a case for banning any Tyson related threads.

Goodnight, Irene · Post by **Goodnight, Irene** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:07

yiddo14 wrote:I think there is a case for banning any Tyson related threads.

You could call it the Chiricahua Law.

chiricahua · Post by **chiricahua** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:08

You sure get mighty emotional for being indifferent to Mike. Vintage nuthugger, straight out of the ballsuckling handbook.......

1. Adamantly deny being a fan- This one is easy, but fanatics like yourself can't follow after here.

2. Don't go into spastic convulsions of rage when others disagree about your messiah- you need work here.

3. Try to occasionally post about something other than the demigod- again, epic fail for you.

Don't feel bad, most obnoxious manlovers like yourself can't make it past rule 1.

Wow what a load of brainless shit.

I'm so biased that i don't have Tyson in my top 10 list,but you a poor neutral net warrior nerd has Holyfield in number 4.
You just got obliterated in this one.

Anyone who says something good about Tyson is a Tyson fan,but unfortunately for you, i already provided a list of boxing historians
and legendary trainers who rate Tyson in the top 10.
I know, they are more Tyson fanatics.

They missed the greatness of your boy Holyfield.

You need to learn something about boxing before making your brainless statements.

Isn't it odd that Frank Bruno performed much better against unstoppable "prime" Tyson than he did against the decrepit old and shot Tyson that would soon be led to slaughter against holyfield?

Both men performed way better in the first time,but again you fail to add the fact that Tyson knocked him down in the first round,then Bruno took a beating,however,are we talking about the Bruno who was ahead in the scorecards against Lennox?

Isn't it odd that Holyfield could not KO Holmes with 42 years old and Tyson did it in 5 when Holmes had 38,let me add that he was the only man who koed Holmes EVER.

Isn't it odd that decrepit old and shot Holyfield defeated by ko Moorer after the Tyson fights considering that he lost against Moorer before.
Isn't it odd that young Holyfield got floored by a c-fighter like Cooper who emulated Frazier style a little bit.
Isn't it odd that your so called prime Holyfield lost twice badly against Riddick Bowe.
Isn't it odd that Holyfield had problems with Alex Stewart and he used headbutts to have the edge and Tyson destroyed Alex in the first round.
Isn't it odd that Holyfield hired Lee haney a steroid addict former Mr.Olympia to train him for the Tyson fight?
Isn't it odd that Holyfield said that Tyson was easy to hit after prison.
Isn't it odd that Holyfield said he was at his absolute best condition against Tyson.

Goodnight, Irene · Post by **Goodnight, Irene** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:10

The oddest thing of all is you.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:11

I hope you don't think anyone is going to read that mess. I'd hate to see you responding about a fighter you actually like.

chiricahua · Post by **chiricahua** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:11

Didn't you hear?

23-year-old Mike Tyson, Heavyweight champ & approx, what, 35, 36-0 was past it already when he first fought Bruno. That's why he struggled to some extent...Image

It seems you are illiterate.

You could call it the Chiricahua Law

I think you should call it,Goodnight "i ignore what i don't like" Irene law.

The oddest thing of all is you.

Well you are the dumbest!

I hope you don't think anyone is going to read that mess. I'd hate to see you responding about a fighter you actually like.

Dumb idiots like you can't read facts.Anyway it useless to argue with biased ignorant fools.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:14

Time to stick this kid on the Broughton list.

chiricahua · Post by **chiricahua** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:15

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Time to stick this kid on the Broughton list.

Looking yourself in the mirror 10 year old boy.

somebody should tell you that your top 10 list taken from a site is untrue.
Holyfield isn't number 4.

Goodnight, Irene · Post by **Goodnight, Irene** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:16

"...I think you should call it,Goodnight "i ignore what i don't like" Irene law..." - Chiri

"...Well you are the dumbest! " - Chiri

Just think, folkes, this is what his mind produces when he has time to think about it & write it down...imagine that rapier wit in action during real discourse...

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:17

Mesmerized by emoticons, I'll bet you could stick him in front of a washing machine for hours and not hear a peep out of the little fella.

The Great John L · Post by **The Great John L** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:17

chiricahua wrote:Isn't it odd that decrepit old and shot Holyfield defeated by ko Moorer after the Tyson fights considering that he lost against Moorer before.

You called someone else illiterate?!!? No offense, because I'm sure you were a little worked up when you typed this, but I have no idea what you are trying to say in the above sentence.

Goodnight, Irene · Post by **Goodnight, Irene** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:18

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Mesmerized by emoticons, I'll bet you could stick him in front of a washing machine for hours and not hear a peep out of the little fella.

Priceless.

chiricahua · Post by **chiricahua** » 29 Oct 2009, 12:19

Goodnight, Irene wrote:"...I think you should call it,Goodnight "i ignore what i don't like" Irene law..." - Chiri

"...Well you are the dumbest! " - Chiri

Just think, folkes, this is what his mind produces when he has time to think about it & write it down...imagine that rapier wit in action during real discourse...

Wow wow poor Irene are you a girl?Sorry if i offended your biased feelings.
Don't bother this isn't a cheerleader group where you can complain about it.

Mesmerized by emoticons, I'll bet you could stick him in front of a washing machine for hours and not hear a peep out of the little fella

It is not hard to see who has more posts around here.

You called someone else illiterate?!!? No offense, because I'm sure you were a little worked up when you typed this, but I have no idea what you are trying to say in the above sentence.

I explained very well official historical facts written by boxing historians and Teddy Atlas.
I was trying to say that Holyfield lost against Moorer before his victories against Tyson and considering that the man was already shot against Tyson he managed to destroy Moorer on a rematch.

Priceless

Your posts are priceless.No doubt!Specially by your selective childish level.

Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog

Re: Which Champ In His Prime Lost His Title To A 42-1 Underdog