Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

gemmell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 16:12

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by gemmell »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLOhmvU5vmQ groves looks well average doesn he teddy? :lol:
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by teddy007 »

But who is sadnar polgar? Smith is the best prospect we have IMO. And groves WILL NOT go on to win a genuine wba, wbc, ibf title.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by hurlock »

should be a good contest,ramagoadi has decent ability.this is the first test out of the england squad.
smith will come on after contest's like these which are worth 20 bum fights.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.
Great prospect is Swifty

Also my Top Prospest is Liam Walsh(a lot will disagree) close points loss to Smith in ABAS...Liam much better suited to the pros...

Good fight for Swifty,very winnable in my eyes..Ramogoadi wont last the distance :TU:
$wifty
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 186
Joined: 21 Jul 2008, 11:26

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by $wifty »

Ramogadi fight isnt on now, Gavin Reid im fighting. Still a decent step up against a tough opponent rather than a journeyman and one im looking forward to. Thanks for all the support :box:
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by hurlock »

damn i was looking forward to the ramogoadi fight!

ramagoadi is alot better then his record suggest's,& can be classy imo.

this reid looks a tough kid in terms of durability. smith has done better jobs on opponents then his predecessors so maybe he'll tick another box.
gemmell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 16:12

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by gemmell »

Tommy Gunn13 wrote:
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.
Great prospect is Swifty

Also my Top Prospest is Liam Walsh(a lot will disagree) close points loss to Smith in ABAS...Liam much better suited to the pros...

Good fight for Swifty,very winnable in my eyes..Ramogoadi wont last the distance :TU:
yeh walsh looks very classy :TU:
gemmell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 16:12

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by gemmell »

teddy007 wrote:But who is sadnar polgar? Smith is the best prospect we have IMO. And groves WILL NOT go on to win a genuine wba, wbc, ibf title.
he did exactly the same to paul samuels :OhYes: smith hasn't fought anybody of dat calibre. groves will blatently go on to big things.hopefully smith will aswell.your the only 1 that seem's to think groves is average.trus me he will be a world class fighter
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by hurlock »

gemmell wrote:
teddy007 wrote:But who is sadnar polgar? Smith is the best prospect we have IMO. And groves WILL NOT go on to win a genuine wba, wbc, ibf title.
he did exactly the same to paul samuels :OhYes: smith hasn't fought anybody of dat calibre. groves will blatently go on to big things.hopefully smith will aswell.your the only 1 that seem's to think groves is average.trus me he will be a world class fighter
s


samuels is shot got spanked by barker early in his career,got beat on prizefighter. he can be dangerous & thats about it.
gemmell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 16:12

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by gemmell »

hurlock wrote:
gemmell wrote:
teddy007 wrote:But who is sadnar polgar? Smith is the best prospect we have IMO. And groves WILL NOT go on to win a genuine wba, wbc, ibf title.
he did exactly the same to paul samuels :OhYes: smith hasn't fought anybody of dat calibre. groves will blatently go on to big things.hopefully smith will aswell.your the only 1 that seem's to think groves is average.trus me he will be a world class fighter
s


samuels is shot got spanked by barker early in his career,got beat on prizefighter. he can be dangerous & thats about it.
i knw he was shot but good fighter to have on your resume in your 3rd pro bout
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by Counter-puncher »

TerribleTerry wrote:
gemmell wrote:
teddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.
if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video's :o
I wouldnt read anything into that gemmell - look who his promoter is - Wazza doesnt like to see his fighters fights publicised via the free web. Take it from someone who has seen Swifty box live a few times: the lad has all the skills and power to boot. A class act :TU:

:TU:

oh and i totally disagree that walsh is better suited to the pros than Smith, swifty from what i have seen has a more economical style to go with heavier hands.
derry mathews
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 43
Joined: 26 Sep 2009, 08:17

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by derry mathews »

diggler wrote:
gemmell wrote:
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.
alot better prospect's out there in my opinion
nah there are alot of really good prospect out there but groves and smith are the 2 oustanding ones, smith is gonna go all the way
i agrre mate am swifty trainin partner , sparrin partner an good freind ,the lad has everythink , and has come on leaps an bounds in the last 12 months , he will clear up in at british level then go on to win major world titles , mark my words , the lad is class
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by whicker »

Smith by a convincing 3rd round stoppage.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video's :o[/quote]
I wouldnt read anything into that gemmell - look who his promoter is - Wazza doesnt like to see his fighters fights publicised via the free web. Take it from someone who has seen Swifty box live a few times: the lad has all the skills and power to boot. A class act :TU:[/quote]


:TU:

oh and i totally disagree that walsh is better suited to the pros than Smith, swifty from what i have seen has a more economical style to go with heavier hands.[/quote]
I meant Walsh himself is suited to the pros better than the Ams
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Stephen Smith v Harry Ramogoadi

Post by Counter-puncher »

gotcha Tommy sorry, misunderstood you there

who saw swifty and how did he look? (my car broke down on the way to liverpool so i didn't get there....)
Post Reply