What will sky sports get rid of in 2005
What will sky sports get rid of in 2005
in 2004 sky got rid of
Ringside
Fight skool
Saturday night live fights
Live fights from america for free.
PPV fights now of vitali.
no king cards
vitually got rid of matchroom.
what will happen in 2005.?
Ringside
Fight skool
Saturday night live fights
Live fights from america for free.
PPV fights now of vitali.
no king cards
vitually got rid of matchroom.
what will happen in 2005.?
Re: What will sky sports get rid of in 2005
That is quite alarming, hopefully they cannot get rid of much more - otherwise there will be no boxing on TV.REAL_DEAL wrote:in 2004 sky got rid of
Ringside
Fight skool
Saturday night live fights
Live fights from america for free.
PPV fights now of vitali.
no king cards
vitually got rid of matchroom.
what will happen in 2005.?
Re: What will sky sports get rid of in 2005
REAL_DEAL wrote:in 2004 sky got rid of
Ringside
Fight skool
Saturday night live fights
Live fights from america for free.
PPV fights now of vitali.
no king cards
vitually got rid of matchroom.
what will happen in 2005.?
Its really about time the UK was on board with American Pay Per View fights etc. The likes of Australia get great coverage of American Boxing, and in this day and age of digital TV its about time HBO and Showtime etc worked with Sky etc to get a channel on digital TV in the UK on a monthly payment and, or Pay Per View.
Make that your Christmas wish mate
I'd love a HBO expansion onto the Sky platform. Think of all the quality programming on the one channel, top boxing, sopranos, six feet under, deadwood, carnivale and a bunch of others.
We have a Wrestling Channel why can't we have a fight channel? They can show UFC, K1 and Pride as well if they need more diverse audiences for it.
We have a Wrestling Channel why can't we have a fight channel? They can show UFC, K1 and Pride as well if they need more diverse audiences for it.
-
glittermonkey
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2658
- Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03
I'd go. If it wasn't for the fact that stupid, fat, ugly, redneck girls scare me shitless.007 wrote:Why not move to the US? Cheaper fuel, less taxes, boxing galore....
That and the fact that everybody's now amazingly paranoid. I swear I couldn't even reach into my pocket without someone else reaching toward theirs, and everyone else eyeing up potential cover.
-
dandantheweatherman
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 337
- Joined: 23 Apr 2004, 20:10
Personally I think Sky have dished up too many meaningless mights in the last couple of years and consequently ratings have suffered so they're scaling down.
Really Ringside should be there to build up and coming talent up and show interesting stuff from around the world, but it didn't seem to do this on the rare occasions I saw it last year.
And PPV cards don't help either. I've got a few mates who are casual boxing fans and none could be arsed to watch PPV stuff. In fact the only fight this year that floated their boats was Barrera-Morales III.
It's a shite state of affairs really, and one which Sky has more than contributed too. I suppose the solution is to make boxing more popular and 'mainstream' again, and for that to happen good fighters need good match ups and exposure, which in turn means taking less money in the short term to get a better long term deal by either trying to convince terrestrial TV to show boxing or having less lucrative cards on Sky on a different night of the week (ie one without football).
Really Ringside should be there to build up and coming talent up and show interesting stuff from around the world, but it didn't seem to do this on the rare occasions I saw it last year.
And PPV cards don't help either. I've got a few mates who are casual boxing fans and none could be arsed to watch PPV stuff. In fact the only fight this year that floated their boats was Barrera-Morales III.
It's a shite state of affairs really, and one which Sky has more than contributed too. I suppose the solution is to make boxing more popular and 'mainstream' again, and for that to happen good fighters need good match ups and exposure, which in turn means taking less money in the short term to get a better long term deal by either trying to convince terrestrial TV to show boxing or having less lucrative cards on Sky on a different night of the week (ie one without football).
-
BunglesFingers
- Heavyweight

-
kevin
- Heavyweight

Re: What will sky sports get rid of in 2005
If they have any sense they will cut up your viewing cardREAL_DEAL wrote:in 2004 sky got rid of
Ringside
Fight skool
Saturday night live fights
Live fights from america for free.
PPV fights now of vitali.
no king cards
vitually got rid of matchroom.
what will happen in 2005.?
-
kevin
- Heavyweight

-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
mickeybeard
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 488
- Joined: 31 Jan 2004, 09:05
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
ABA Boxing
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 772
- Joined: 16 Sep 2004, 13:37
Re: What will sky sports get rid of in 2005
ME if they put there price up anymoe!REAL_DEAL wrote:in 2004 sky got rid of
Ringside
Fight skool
Saturday night live fights
Live fights from america for free.
PPV fights now of vitali.
no king cards
vitually got rid of matchroom.
what will happen in 2005.?
sky sports boxing in 2005 according to there listings
Jan 21 2005 WBU cruiserweight title
Enzo Maccarinelli v Rich La Montagane SS1 22.00 Bridgend LC
Jan 28 2005 WBO featherweight title
Scott Harrison v Victor Polo SS1 22.00 Braehead Arena
Feb 11 2005 WBO super-featherweight title
Joe Calzaghe v TBA SS1 22.00 MEN Arena
Feb 25 2005 British/C'wealth titles
Matt Skelton v TBA
British lightweight title
Graham Earl v TBA SS1 22.00 Wembley Arena
-----------------------------------------------------------
no matchroom cards.
Jan 21 2005 WBU cruiserweight title
Enzo Maccarinelli v Rich La Montagane SS1 22.00 Bridgend LC
Jan 28 2005 WBO featherweight title
Scott Harrison v Victor Polo SS1 22.00 Braehead Arena
Feb 11 2005 WBO super-featherweight title
Joe Calzaghe v TBA SS1 22.00 MEN Arena
Feb 25 2005 British/C'wealth titles
Matt Skelton v TBA
British lightweight title
Graham Earl v TBA SS1 22.00 Wembley Arena
-----------------------------------------------------------
no matchroom cards.
-
lirva33
- Heavyweight

REAL_DEAL wrote:sky sports boxing in 2005 according to there listings
Jan 21 2005 WBU cruiserweight title
Enzo Maccarinelli v Rich La Montagane SS1 22.00 Bridgend LC
Jan 28 2005 WBO featherweight title
Scott Harrison v Victor Polo SS1 22.00 Braehead Arena
Feb 11 2005 WBO super-featherweight title
Joe Calzaghe v TBA SS1 22.00 MEN Arena
Feb 25 2005 British/C'wealth titles
Matt Skelton v TBA
British lightweight title
Graham Earl v TBA SS1 22.00 Wembley Arena
-----------------------------------------------------------
no matchroom cards.
oh dear.
Thankfully I don't live at home anymore so I won't be watching most of the mismatches on Sky. I'll only watch the big fights from now on. It's ridiculous watching someone like Macrinelli blast a no hoper out in 1 round every time then Calzaghe and Hatton fights leave a lot to be desired too. joke.
-
Lefthookhappy19
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 968
- Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 19:15
Hang on a minute! Is Macarinelli really fighting Rich LaMontagane? A bastardin 35 year old. Another old man for Macca to beat up. Remember back when Haye fought Thompson? Macca came out and badmouthed Haye saying he only fights old men. This guy can be serious. Does Frank advise these guys how to act on the media or something? Advising them how to become as despised as he is. All his fighters are becoming hated. Here's the guy.
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=007613
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=007613