Paul McCloskey's performance

gemmell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 16:12

Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by gemmell »

good performance from mccloskey. he is awkward.hard to hit.has brilliant stamina.good chin.can dig a bit and is very good to watch..think he has a chance of going on to win a world title.mcloskey vs khan has to happen!! how do you guys rate that performance????.probably not his best but still a very good display. rossilla was very very tough! i expected him to fold over in the 1st few rounds. where next for mcloskey??
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by TerribleTerry »

McCloskey would have got to Rasilla more quickly if he spent more time setting up his power shots, feinted more and mixed it up a bit.

He was too reliant on countering with single hard back hand punches.

Good fighter but needs more variety for my money to excel at the highest level.
bfchunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 884
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 15:39

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by bfchunk »

Not bad. Needs to throw a few more combinations though.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by Hagler2002 »

Very average, nowhere near world level.
gemmell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 16:12

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by gemmell »

Hagler2002 wrote:Very average, nowhere near world level.
he'd give khan a good fight
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by Hagler2002 »

gemmell wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Very average, nowhere near world level.
he'd give khan a good fight
I was told last month they had already been offered the fight for early next year.
Last edited by Hagler2002 on 06 Nov 2009, 19:48, edited 1 time in total.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by Hagler2002 »

sg1985 wrote:Decent enough performance, the guy didn't engage him much, I didn't think it would last that long.
I was on the McCloskey win by KO large, I was starting to get very nervous.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by jBacca »

gemmell wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Very average, nowhere near world level.
he'd give khan a good fight
Khan would rip McCloskey apart.

McCloskey looked decent against quite a limited opponent. Think he'd get battered against world class opponents.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by thepocketrocket »

Well to beat Paul Applebey and win a European title in such a short space of time is huge! He is a natural counter-puncher, dont expect him to go all guns blazing, he picked his shots lovely and Ko'd his opponent!

Why are we questioning the performance?
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by steve689 »

Paul Appleby?
BigEars
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 998
Joined: 16 Jan 2006, 14:23

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by BigEars »

thepocketrocket wrote:Well to beat Paul Applebey and win a European title in such a short space of time is huge! He is a natural counter-puncher, dont expect him to go all guns blazing, he picked his shots lovely and Ko'd his opponent!

Why are we questioning the performance?
You've mixed up Paul McCloskey and Martin Lindsay.
charlieb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1014
Joined: 01 May 2005, 10:58

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by charlieb »

steve689 wrote:Paul Appleby?
Martin Lindsay, maybe?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by leforge »

he beat Khan imo. I think McCloskey is going well we get better!
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by Hagler2002 »

leforge wrote:he beat Khan imo. I think McCloskey is going well we get better!
No defense, pot shooting against a Spanish lightweight champion, yeah the signs are all there he'd beat Khan :o
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by leforge »

Khan should have been stopped against limond! Khan is overrated the public dont buy him hence his pay per view figures are about 10000 per fight!
charlieb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1014
Joined: 01 May 2005, 10:58

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by charlieb »

I haven't been impressed with McCloskey so far but can't deny he's got very good power, a good engine and seems to be tough as nails, sometimes that's all you need, just look at Froch.

Khan would be far too sharp for him imo. He might've had a good shot at an upset before the Prescott fight but if the fight comes off now he'd be outboxed and intermittently stung until cracks appear and he gets taken out mid to late in the fight.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by leforge »

Khan an overrated fighter! Is he next fight even on tv?
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by whicker »

Hagler2002 wrote:
against a Spanish lightweight champion,
Yeah.

This simply was not a fight to see who was "Champion of Europe."

For sure, the guy came in late, there was an injury etc- fair do's.

But, put simply, this was a shocking for a European title fight (one of many awful match ups for that belt.)
Last edited by whicker on 06 Nov 2009, 22:13, edited 1 time in total.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by crusader »

I'd be surprised if McCloskey won more than 3 rounds against Khan. He is to slow and basic and would be out boxed with ease.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by leforge »

Khan was kocked out by Limond but the ref bottle it! Thats how good Khan is!
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by crusader »

Khan's improved his defense and his boxing skills. His footwork and his guard have come along greatly. McCloskey is to slow and would be unlikely to catch him with anything meaningful. Of course there is a chance for a KO because Khans chin isn't there, but McCloskey would find it very difficult to find that chin, you can't hurt what you can't hit. He would be pelted with fast combos from Khan and would lose clearly. I don't think McCloskey has proven he's world class yet anyways. All the players at 140 would eat him up.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by leforge »

Nor has Khan prpven anything! He such a popular chap with sky box office he gets about 10000 people paying for his fights lol
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by crusader »

leforge wrote:Nor has Khan prpven anything! He such a popular chap with sky box office he gets about 10000 people paying for his fights lol

He outclassed and nearly shutout a top 10 fighter. Tell me when McCloskey does that and I'll rate him higher.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by thepocketrocket »

Jesus, had too many last night and had brain fade!!! i am off to scourge myself by watching Johnny Nelsons 10 greatest defences!!! lmao!!!!
yiddo14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Paul McCloskey's performance

Post by yiddo14 »

whicker wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:
against a Spanish lightweight champion,
Yeah.

This simply was not a fight to see who was "Champion of Europe."

For sure, the guy came in late, there was an injury etc- fair do's.

But, put simply, this was a shocking for a European title fight (one of many awful match ups for that belt.)
:TU:

Totally agree. The European Belt is much devalued thesedays.

As for Khan-McCloskey...McCloskey needs to beat a top 30 fighter first before we start chatting about him challenging for a world title! Kotelnik would beat him handily I think, let alone Khan.
Post Reply