NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Without getting into a dense lineal title debate, David Haye is essentially Britain's FOURTH heavyweight champ, yes?
1. Bob Fitzsimmons (even though he left Cornwall as a boy & apparently spoke with a New Zealand accent...oh dear)
2. Lennox Lewis (replace 'Cornwall' with 'London' & 'New Zealand' with 'weird Canadian-Jamaican hybrid' and we're starting to have a theme)
3. Frank Bruno
4. David Haye
Considering the opponents and the belts at stake, I would say those are our four British world champs, even if Bruno and Haye have slightly more credible claims to being British world champs.
But Herbie Hide and Henry Akinwande? Do we really want to consider these guys and their crappy WBO belts as authentic reigns? Akinwande who only had to roll over JEREMY WILLIAMS for a cheap belt when Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson, Bowe, Golata, Mercer, McCall, Tua, Witherspoon and many others were knocking about?
Herbie Hide who beat a novice undergoing dangerous blackouts in Michael Bentt and later a 40 year old drug addled Tony Tucker, then had the audacity to claim Lewis & Holyfield were 'ducking' him whilst he bumped off obscure German and American clubfighters in title defences?
Please, PLEASE tell me Ian Darke got it wrong, and we Brit fans dont consider Hide and Akinwande as 'champions' of any description?
1. Bob Fitzsimmons (even though he left Cornwall as a boy & apparently spoke with a New Zealand accent...oh dear)
2. Lennox Lewis (replace 'Cornwall' with 'London' & 'New Zealand' with 'weird Canadian-Jamaican hybrid' and we're starting to have a theme)
3. Frank Bruno
4. David Haye
Considering the opponents and the belts at stake, I would say those are our four British world champs, even if Bruno and Haye have slightly more credible claims to being British world champs.
But Herbie Hide and Henry Akinwande? Do we really want to consider these guys and their crappy WBO belts as authentic reigns? Akinwande who only had to roll over JEREMY WILLIAMS for a cheap belt when Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson, Bowe, Golata, Mercer, McCall, Tua, Witherspoon and many others were knocking about?
Herbie Hide who beat a novice undergoing dangerous blackouts in Michael Bentt and later a 40 year old drug addled Tony Tucker, then had the audacity to claim Lewis & Holyfield were 'ducking' him whilst he bumped off obscure German and American clubfighters in title defences?
Please, PLEASE tell me Ian Darke got it wrong, and we Brit fans dont consider Hide and Akinwande as 'champions' of any description?
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
NO we do not.
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
we do, but not in a "global" sense.
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Herbie is a British heavyweight champ even though the opponent wasn't much, and Akinwande is an authentic European champ, yet both steered around each other when they should have boxed in 93/94.
Had ethy fought, one of the pair would actually have a young undefeated 'name' victim on their record. Lol.
Poor, poor, poor.
Had ethy fought, one of the pair would actually have a young undefeated 'name' victim on their record. Lol.
Poor, poor, poor.
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
just because no one likes the belt, they were still world champs!!
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
It could also be said that Hide and Akinwande are as British as Greg Rudeski!!
Also while Bruno won a genuine belt he won it against a very poor McCall and must be regarded as weak as champion as Hide and Akinwande
Also while Bruno won a genuine belt he won it against a very poor McCall and must be regarded as weak as champion as Hide and Akinwande
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
I don't consider them that, no.
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Does it depend on the fighter as much as the title? How many would say no but would consider Chris Eubank, for example, a world champ?
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
You could claim Bentt as well.
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Herbie Hide was World Champion... You can't take that away from him... ![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Also, Joe Bugner and Audley Harrison were both WBF 'world' champions and Matt Skelton was the WBU 'world' champion - for what that's worth.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
At the end of the day Herbie boxed excellent against Bent,who one fight before destroyed Tommy Morrison..Enough said!!!ERIC GUY wrote:just because no one likes the belt, they were still world champs!!
Hes never been a world beater but he is a ex heavyweight champion of the world
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Wasn't Johnny Nelson a WBF heavy champ also?
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
BBC also missed it too.Terry D wrote:Was going to throw that in myself. When Darkie said that I thought I was bombed out of my head. I was but the figure still didn't add up. Then I threw in the fringe wins and away you go. Lewis and Fitzsimmons were champions. Arguably Lewis, who defended his belt numerous times, was the only true one, as the others had either fringe titles or lost the championship at the first hurdle.Floyd wrote:You could claim Bentt as well.
Poor fake Sonny Liston.
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Floyd,
Indeed Mr Nelson was.
Earlier this year I auctioned off the belt for him, to raise funds for St Johns Ambulance.
Indeed Mr Nelson was.
Earlier this year I auctioned off the belt for him, to raise funds for St Johns Ambulance.
-
Londonirish
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3064
- Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
twenty six wrote:Floyd,
Indeed Mr Nelson was.
Earlier this year I auctioned off the belt for him, to raise funds for St Johns Ambulance.
How Much did t make?
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
But they are still British.overhand_right wrote:Without getting into a dense lineal title debate, David Haye is essentially Britain's FOURTH heavyweight champ, yes?
1. Bob Fitzsimmons (even though he left Cornwall as a boy & apparently spoke with a New Zealand accent...oh dear)
2. Lennox Lewis (replace 'Cornwall' with 'London' & 'New Zealand' with 'weird Canadian-Jamaican hybrid' and we're starting to have a theme)
Most Scousers have an Irish dialect but you consider them British? How they sound has nothing to do with where they are from.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Until this decade, the WBO wasn't really valid at heavyweight. On the one hand, it's unfair to treat a title in one division differently than in others, but on the other you could say it's fair comment when you look at the title fights on offer. In the same decade that Lewis, Holyfield, Bowe, Tyson, Foreman and Holmes were mixing it up, the WBO was giving us Akinwande-Welch, Hide-Reed, Hide-Fischer and hauling Tim Tomashek out of the crowd to face its only marquee champion (Morrison) who didn't dump the belt as soon as they won it (Mercer, Moorer, Bowe).
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13313
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
About £4.99 I'd guess.Londonirish wrote:twenty six wrote:Floyd,
Indeed Mr Nelson was.
Earlier this year I auctioned off the belt for him, to raise funds for St Johns Ambulance.
How Much did t make?
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
I suppose we would have to mention bugner,he won the WBF against bonecrusher smith ![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Yes and WBUFloyd wrote:Wasn't Johnny Nelson a WBF heavy champ also?
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
It raised £1,000.
No need for that Oh Mighty Warrior.
You ever done anything tangible for a worthy cause ?
No need for that Oh Mighty Warrior.
You ever done anything tangible for a worthy cause ?
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Calm down 26, he wasn't teasing the auctioning of it, but the worthlessness of the WBF heavyweight belt.
I'm pleased and surprised it raised so much
I'm pleased and surprised it raised so much
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
Thanks 26. Thought so. Good to hear money was raised for a worthy cause.twenty six wrote:Floyd,
Indeed Mr Nelson was.
Earlier this year I auctioned off the belt for him, to raise funds for St Johns Ambulance.
Re: NOBODY CONSIDERS AKINWANDE & HIDE EX-CHAMPS, RIGHT?
That pretty much sums it up for me too. The WBO has given a lot of average at best British fighters undeserved opportunities to call themselves world champions.oliverfennell wrote:Until this decade, the WBO wasn't really valid at heavyweight. On the one hand, it's unfair to treat a title in one division differently than in others, but on the other you could say it's fair comment when you look at the title fights on offer. In the same decade that Lewis, Holyfield, Bowe, Tyson, Foreman and Holmes were mixing it up, the WBO was giving us Akinwande-Welch, Hide-Reed, Hide-Fischer and hauling Tim Tomashek out of the crowd to face its only marquee champion (Morrison) who didn't dump the belt as soon as they won it (Mercer, Moorer, Bowe).