Boxing News review of 2004
Boxing News review of 2004
Thought I'd comment on it...
British fighter of the year they have Danny Williams at 3. Although he obviously deserves a mention in the top 10 I think 3 is way too high. When you consider he beat a shot Tyson but lost to Sprott and was thoroughly outclassed against Klitschko. Harrison definitely deserves to be above him, Barnes, Kelly also. And Alexander perhaps above him. One good win and 2 losses does not make a good year for anyone I dont care what anyone says. Not downplaying the achievement but when you're reviewing the year you have to take the whole 12 months into account.
British fighter of the year they have Danny Williams at 3. Although he obviously deserves a mention in the top 10 I think 3 is way too high. When you consider he beat a shot Tyson but lost to Sprott and was thoroughly outclassed against Klitschko. Harrison definitely deserves to be above him, Barnes, Kelly also. And Alexander perhaps above him. One good win and 2 losses does not make a good year for anyone I dont care what anyone says. Not downplaying the achievement but when you're reviewing the year you have to take the whole 12 months into account.
Thanks 007.007 wrote:The list is as follows:
1) Ricky Hatton
2) Carl Thompson
3) Danny Williams
4) Scott Harrison
5) David Barnes
6) Damaen Kelly
7) Wayne Alexander
8) Mark Hobson
9) Esham Pickering
10) Graham Earl
Alexander lost to Mellis in December 2003 so not this year.
1) Thompson,
2) Barnes
3) Alexander
4) Hatton
5) Harrison
6) Pickering
7) Williams
8) Earl
9) Hobson
10) Nicky Cook.
Kelly is out because he lost to Pachecco and also hasn't done anything out of the ordinary, he was "expected" to beat Booth. Thomas McDonough is a tad unlucky not to make my list, had some good wins in 2004.
Bit harsh changing your #1 fighter there. Did you write it before the Williams vs Klitchsko card (as Alexander vs Melis was on the same night).bennie wrote:I did the top 10 for BN, which originally read:
Carl Thompson
Danny Williams
Ricky Hatton
Junior Witter
David Barnes
Damaen Kelly
Wayne Alexander
Scott Harrison
Esham Pickering
Graham Earl
But things change, inevitably.
I wrote it after Alexander-Mellis (Mellis had previously flattened Wayne, so that was an excellent win; can't understand it when people criticise fighters who win on points; those 10 rounds will enable Wayne to look much better against McDonagh, believe me).stujones wrote:Bit harsh changing your #1 fighter there. Did you write it before the Williams vs Klitchsko card (as Alexander vs Melis was on the same night).bennie wrote:I did the top 10 for BN, which originally read:
Carl Thompson
Danny Williams
Ricky Hatton
Junior Witter
David Barnes
Damaen Kelly
Wayne Alexander
Scott Harrison
Esham Pickering
Graham Earl
But things change, inevitably.
Knew they would change Carl Thompson. The gloves, you know.
Last edited by bennie on 08 Jan 2005, 17:46, edited 1 time in total.
Think Alexander should have been higher (if you don't mind me saying). As he scored two good wins in 2004, a year in which he has been undefeated.bennie wrote:I wrote it after Alexander-Mellis (Mellis had previously flattened Wayne, so that was an excellent win; can't understand it when people criticise fighters who win on points; those 10 rounds will enable Wayne to look much better againt McDonagh, believe me).stujones wrote:Bit harsh changing your #1 fighter there. Did you write it before the Williams vs Klitchsko card (as Alexander vs Melis was on the same night).bennie wrote:I did the top 10 for BN, which originally read:
Carl Thompson
Danny Williams
Ricky Hatton
Junior Witter
David Barnes
Damaen Kelly
Wayne Alexander
Scott Harrison
Esham Pickering
Graham Earl
But things change, inevitably.
Knew they would change Carl Thompson. The gloves, you know.
EDIT - Although saying that he did struggle vs Clarke in 2004, but ground out the win.
I think there are at least 10 more deserving cases who've stayed busy and moved their careers forward. Nelson has been going nowhere for a while. A good win but one good win does not make a great year for me.bennie wrote:Beats a German in Germany. Are you sure about that?007 wrote:Johnny Nelson? He only fought once he should be nowhere near that list.
Nice to see Michael Hunter in your thoughts Bennie. Not his most active year but certainly his most significant. He is busting for Pickering in 2005 and I believe that fight will come off if Sky can produce the goods. Until then it looks like he may be boxing Salem Bouaita (who took Cook and Medjkoune the distance and was stopped in nine by Monshipour.