it would appear that wayAsterix wrote:Yet another, eh?Hagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Asterix wrote:Yet another, eh?Hagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
Yeah and if I got everyone right I'd be a millionaire, you must have a 100% strike rate do you
Hagler2002 wrote:I just don't see this one going the distance, 5/6 on Khan by stoppage seems a good price, after watching a bit of Salita he isn't the hardest fighter to hit
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
And how did your selections go at the weekend NobEndBoxingFan?NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:it would appear that wayAsterix wrote:Yet another, eh?Hagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
i predicted Enz would get beat (admittedly i didn't even look at the oppos name or record)
i predicted Degale would get booed but I don't know.
I predicted Arthur would give Wright hell and take him on points
I predicted Salita would provide young Mr Khan with a stern test (but not beat him).
And I predicted John Simpson would stop Mr Bell in 6 or 7, forget which round it was stopped in, but I was one round out.
..............I know what you're all going to say........you were only ONE round out on the Simpson victory, North East, what a fcking legend
I thank you all 
D
i predicted Degale would get booed but I don't know.
I predicted Arthur would give Wright hell and take him on points
I predicted Salita would provide young Mr Khan with a stern test (but not beat him).
And I predicted John Simpson would stop Mr Bell in 6 or 7, forget which round it was stopped in, but I was one round out.
..............I know what you're all going to say........you were only ONE round out on the Simpson victory, North East, what a fcking legend
I thank you all
DRe: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:i predicted Enz would get beat (admittedly i didn't even look at the oppos name or record)
i predicted Degale would get booed but I don't know.
I predicted Arthur would give Wright hell and take him on points
I predicted Salita would provide young Mr Khan with a stern test (but not beat him).
And I predicted John Simpson would stop Mr Bell in 6 or 7, forget which round it was stopped in, but I was one round out.
..............I know what you're all going to say........you were only ONE round out on the Simpson victory, North East, what a fcking legend
I thank you all
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Sarcasm Adam, I was being sarcastic..........has sarcasm reached Preston yet?......you're in for a treat.
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Very good peformance! Like to see him fighting again about March.
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Adam, do me a favour....put that picture up of you and Tyson Fury again now, go on mate do it for me. He's 5 times better than any hevyweight in the world right now you know....and Foreman, what with his pole-axing jab and detonating right. Well he'd have beat him easy.......(Pops Fury, 2009)
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
well that statement makes mitchell above that level nowHagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
handles wrote:well that statement makes mitchell above that level nowHagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
Oh here's another fornicating expert with a 100% strike rate on his selections
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
aint my fault im a better predictor than you mateHagler2002 wrote:handles wrote:well that statement makes mitchell above that level nowHagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
Oh here's another effing expert with a 100% strike rate on his selections
DRe: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Handles ...stop upsetting people and making them sulk by proving em wrong this time of night! 
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Well....Mitchell clearly OUTBOXED Prescott, do you think you under rated Mitchells skills?christymetcalfe1 wrote:mitchell has absolutely no chance, what a bad matchup for him imo, it seems ridiculous that everyones saying that prescott cant box because of one bad outing mitchell rarely outbox's average opponents prescott will jab his head off and knock him out reletively early-his skills underrated
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
I didntDes1 wrote:Well....Mitchell clearly OUTBOXED Prescott, do you think you under rated Mitchells skills?christymetcalfe1 wrote:mitchell has absolutely no chance, what a bad matchup for him imo, it seems ridiculous that everyones saying that prescott cant box because of one bad outing mitchell rarely outbox's average opponents prescott will jab his head off and knock him out reletively early-his skills underrated