Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by jBacca »

I wanna' see Davies-Power 2 ..!
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

haskins is a terrible fighter to watch. all he does is hold..hit on the break and duck his head low!!!!!!!!! how he didn't get a point deducted i will neva knw!!!!!!!!!!!
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by jBacca »

Could argue that Broadhurst was jumping in all the time missing his shots.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by 15829 »

jBacca wrote:Could argue that Broadhurst was jumping in all the time missing his shots.
I don't powers taken to much damage he sounded bad in his interview davis would be to big and strong for him
Pongsaklek
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 135
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:06

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by Pongsaklek »

I think if there ever was a bout that screamed for a LOSER LEAVES BOXING and takes the winner with him stipulation, that was it.
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by neil hibbert »

jBacca wrote:I wanna' see Davies-Power 2 ..!
:TU:
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by neil hibbert »

diggler wrote:
jBacca wrote:Could argue that Broadhurst was jumping in all the time missing his shots.
I don't powers taken to much damage he sounded bad in his interview davis would be to big and strong for him
:TU:
MPG
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 642
Joined: 14 Aug 2005, 17:06

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by MPG »

Great win tonight for Power,onwards and upwards now for him.He said his going move down to S-Fly which would be great because he can make S-Fly easy.Forget about Davies because he much too big for Power,Davies weight in on the night against Napa at 10 stone,Martin would be giving way too much Weight to the Naturally Bigger Davies.IMO go down to S-Fly and take Haskins Belts off him...

REALLY REALLY PLEASE FOR YA MARTIN
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Im glad i didnt stay indoors&watch it,going by what u chaps were saying...
I thought Broadhurst would be way to much for Haskins(another prediction wrong) :oops:
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by neil hibbert »

yer id like to see martin back at superfly, he looked good 2nite but got caught with a fair few shots! move down would be wise and id like to see him get the belt for keeps, all the best martin!!! ps davies napa 2 is what i wanna see!
leeharding
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 589
Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 16:18

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by leeharding »

MPG wrote:Great win tonight for Power,onwards and upwards now for him.He said his going move down to S-Fly which would be great because he can make S-Fly easy.Forget about Davies because he much too big for Power,Davies weight in on the night against Napa at 10 stone,Martin would be giving way too much Weight to the Naturally Bigger Davies.IMO go down to S-Fly and take Haskins Belts off him...

REALLY REALLY PLEASE FOR YA MARTIN
congratulations looked absolutely quality there tonight well in martin :TU:
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

Horse wrote:Does it really matter about Price's and Jeffries's quality of opponent at this stage?

Isn't it more important to keep them busy?
it's about keeping them busy and giving them durable opponents. not guys who are frightened
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5455
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by forcefraser »

Terrible fight. One of the worst this year.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by whicker »

forcefraser wrote:Terrible fight. One of the worst this year.
(assuming you mean Haskins) - I'd say it was OK, to be honest. Nothing that really got the pulse racing, for sure for sure, but something to whack on in the background on a Friday evening.

Smith Quigley , Small V Mc etc and for that matter, even Haye (although more at stake, of course) were no better as a sporting contest.
bigped
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1572
Joined: 05 Jul 2004, 16:26

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by bigped »

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:haskins is a terrible fighter to watch. all he does is hold..hit on the break and duck his head low!!!!!!!!! how he didn't get a point deducted i will neva knw!!!!!!!!!!!

Why dont you box and just hold hit on break and duck ur head low surely if thats all there is to it you will become british anc commenwealth champion too.
mike john
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 271
Joined: 26 Jan 2007, 06:24

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by mike john »

ive trained on and off at sanigars gym in bristol for about 5 years now and ive never been a fan of lee haskins. he blows out lesser foes, but decent boxers figure him out in a round or two, as i thought would be the case here. yet as bad as this fight was, he won convincingly
FtmPress
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 585
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 07:45

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by FtmPress »

All i can say is sorry that tonights card did not live up to most of our cards this year,I can tell you that we will double check opponents records from now on and will not be using lavtin boxers any more. I am really sorry to all you boxing fans old there for tonights show but i will say there was some good undercard fights.The top of the bill was oder by the BBBof C.You must recall they were both champion going into the ring tonight.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by Deserter »

FtmPress wrote:All i can say is sorry that tonights card did not live up to most of our cards this year,I can tell you that we will double check opponents records from now on and will not be using lavtin boxers any more. I am really sorry to all you boxing fans old there for tonights show but i will say there was some good undercard fights.The top of the bill was oder by the BBBof C.You must recall they were both champion going into the ring tonight.
What a great (and refreshing) attitude - treating fans with this level of respect can only be a positive thing for all concerned.... if only another well-known promoter could learn from this.... ;;-)
statmanjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 82
Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 11:36

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by statmanjohn »

FtmPress wrote:All i can say is sorry that tonights card did not live up to most of our cards this year,I can tell you that we will double check opponents records from now on and will not be using lavtin boxers any more. I am really sorry to all you boxing fans old there for tonights show but i will say there was some good undercard fights.The top of the bill was oder by the BBBof C.You must recall they were both champion going into the ring tonight.
For the amount of great cards you've had this year, an off night can be forgiven.
You didn't need to post on here, but the fact you have is very refreshing....Good work Frank, Here's to a smashing 2010!
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by Finch »

statmanjohn wrote:
FtmPress wrote:All i can say is sorry that tonights card did not live up to most of our cards this year,I can tell you that we will double check opponents records from now on and will not be using lavtin boxers any more. I am really sorry to all you boxing fans old there for tonights show but i will say there was some good undercard fights.The top of the bill was oder by the BBBof C.You must recall they were both champion going into the ring tonight.
For the amount of great cards you've had this year, an off night can be forgiven.
You didn't need to post on here, but the fact you have is very refreshing....Good work Frank, Here's to a smashing 2010!

Here here, respect to Frank for his post.
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

bigped wrote:
MrBoxingUK2 wrote:haskins is a terrible fighter to watch. all he does is hold..hit on the break and duck his head low!!!!!!!!! how he didn't get a point deducted i will neva knw!!!!!!!!!!!

Why dont you box and just hold hit on break and duck ur head low surely if thats all there is to it you will become british anc commenwealth champion too.
that's what he does every single fight. that is why he is hard to beat. he is just as bad as watching anthony small
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Broadhurst vs Haskin Round By Round

Post by alexpaterson »

Absoulote terrible fight, Haskins isnt great to watch and Broadhurst leant in and constantly held to make it a really scarpy fight, Broadhurst just wasnt expierenced enough to know what to do against an akward fighter like Haskins, good result for Haskins though let's hope we dont have to see a rematch of that.

Very happy for Matin Power to get the win looked good and strong at the weight so he will be even stronger and powerfuller at Super Flyweight
Post Reply