paul smith- opinions
-
boltonkings
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39
- Joined: 10 Dec 2009, 07:27
paul smith- opinions
tipped by some to go to the top, smith doesnt look like he has that quality atall to me i feel he is severely overrated, quigley looked about as good a out and out boxer as smith did, what are your opinions on smiths ability and how far he could go if he got his act together?
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: paul smith- opinions
British champion. A very, very credible level to reach.
Hope we see the Quigley rematch and its a cleaner clash.
Hope we see the Quigley rematch and its a cleaner clash.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: paul smith- opinions
i basically agree with you, at least to the extent that for some people on some forums a couple of years back, he was talked about as potential world class etc which i never quite agreed with.boltonkings wrote:tipped by some to go to the top, smith doesnt look like he has that quality atall to me i feel he is severely overrated, quigley looked about as good a out and out boxer as smith did, what are your opinions on smiths ability and how far he could go if he got his act together?
but i agree with DP and think he will be around the british level for some time to come- esp. as i think he sells a fair few tickets.
Re: paul smith- opinions
Top bloke, still improving. Could be a very good fighter if it all comes together.
Re: paul smith- opinions
couldnt agree moregobbles wrote:Top bloke, still improving. Could be a very good fighter if it all comes together.
him and dodson set 12th march echo arena
Re: paul smith- opinions
I believe he can go beyond British class though he has to prove that yet. I have absolutely no idea how you can argue Quigley was anywhere near as good a boxer as Smith. Quigley has his qualities but boxing isn't one of them. Scrapping and spoiling, yes.boltonkings wrote:tipped by some to go to the top, smith doesnt look like he has that quality atall to me i feel he is severely overrated, quigley looked about as good a out and out boxer as smith did, what are your opinions on smiths ability and how far he could go if he got his act together?
-
boltonkings
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39
- Joined: 10 Dec 2009, 07:27
Re: paul smith- opinions
i agree that potentiallly smith is more talented but i feel quigleys skills are underrated he competely dominated the battle of the jabs against smith threw more and land more, smith in no way outboxed him
Re: paul smith- opinions
quigley will do much better at his natrual weight class
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: paul smith- opinions
Amen brother.diggler wrote:quigley will do much better at his natrual weight class
-
Londonirish
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3064
- Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02
Re: paul smith- opinions
diggler wrote:couldnt agree moregobbles wrote:Top bloke, still improving. Could be a very good fighter if it all comes together.![]()
him and dodson set 12th march echo arena
X3
-
boltonkings
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39
- Joined: 10 Dec 2009, 07:27
Re: paul smith- opinions
i mean essentially smith was given ratings of talent above barker and others when they were coming up, think how easily barker would outbox him, it just seems strange that his reputation levels were where they were
Re: paul smith- opinions
smigga is still a quality boxer just seems to want to bang more lately, id give him a chance with anyone at super mid bar froch and middle domesticly
-
boltonkings
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39
- Joined: 10 Dec 2009, 07:27
Re: paul smith- opinions
how would u see a matchup with smith and mcgee goingdiggler
Re: paul smith- opinions
A fight isn't all about jabs is it being honest? Styles make fights, ours didn't gel simple. It was scrappy and he was awkward and strong but the decision was correct and the result is all that mattered to me in a fight of that caliber, i.e local derby first title etc. I was expecting him to be on the back foot from the off, he wasn't, so I stuck to my boxing which I knew was better. I switched off in the middle rounds with the cut for reasons above, massive fight and a lot at stake, didn't wanna get stopped on a cut.boltonkings wrote:i agree that potentiallly smith is more talented but i feel quigleys skills are underrated he competely dominated the battle of the jabs against smith threw more and land more, smith in no way outboxed him
With regards to my hype and being over-rated, I've never once said that I'm going to be or that I am world class. I may be but who knows, time will tell. I've never said I'm going to be undisputed world champion or even a world champion, I've always said I'd LOVE TO BE and I will give it my best and see what happens.
So the hype and expectations are not my fault and they haven't come from me.
I have my fans and I really appreciate it, The Contender was great for my profile and maybe that's where some of the hype comes from, I personally don't see it as I see myself at the level I am at for now. People who know me will tell you I'm modest and realistic.... I read on here once that I was a miserable barstard!
Someone did post at the time that I "take a serious job seriously" and that sums it up I think.
I'm proud being British Champion and I have worked for that since I was 9 years old. I would love to clean up domestically and go on to the world scene, God willing that will happen. There's worse fighters than me that have won world titles.... I think
I rarely post on these forums as the small minority just try to wind people up and such, but I do enjoy reading them and 90% of the people are really knowledgeable. But thanks for the comments anyway, good and bad they all get taken on board. Thanks again for the support to the people that do, all the very best to Boxrec for Christmas and a happy and healthy 2010
Paul
Re: paul smith- opinions
boltonkings wrote:i mean essentially smith was given ratings of talent above barker and others when they were coming up, think how easily barker would outbox him, it just seems strange that his reputation levels were where they were
Again thanks for the critisism, but Barker is a middleweight and as nice a lad he is, his chin will let him down. Macklin stops him.
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: paul smith- opinions
I think he's a very good fighter, euro level at a push but a very credible domestic fighter. Who will be a tough fight for anyone.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: paul smith- opinions
Smigga wrote:
With regards to my hype and being over-rated, I've never once said that I'm going to be or that I am world class. I may be but who knows, time will tell. I've never said I'm going to be undisputed world champion or even a world champion, I've always said I'd LOVE TO BE and I will give it my best and see what happens.![]()
So the hype and expectations are not my fault and they haven't come from me.
Someone did post at the time that I "take a serious job seriously" and that sums it up I think.
I'm proud being British Champion and I have worked for that since I was 9 years old. I would love to clean up domestically and go on to the world scene, God willing that will happen.
class reply mate fair play
Re: paul smith- opinions
Classy post Paul, nice one.
I was at the Quigley fight and throught it was pretty entertaining! A couple of casual sports fan pals came too and they are keen on going to the Dodson fight so it can't have been too bad.
Ignore the daft minority on here, its always interesting to get the pro's like yourself perspective on things.
I was at the Quigley fight and throught it was pretty entertaining! A couple of casual sports fan pals came too and they are keen on going to the Dodson fight so it can't have been too bad.
Ignore the daft minority on here, its always interesting to get the pro's like yourself perspective on things.
Re: paul smith- opinions
boltonkings wrote:how would u see a matchup with smith and mcgee goingdiggler
i think smith would win a points descion if they fought next magees age and inactivity would play a huge part and smith would use his better boixng skills to win the fight
-
whatashambles
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 668
- Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30
Re: paul smith- opinions
Card updated here http://boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=592556
Re: paul smith- opinions
bellew is fighting for a title not sure what one possibly the commonwealth hopefully against someone like fry and i think stephen smith should fight for the vacant english title against truscott or bhatia
Re: paul smith- opinions
I like watching Smith fight.
There are far more talented fighters out there, who i don't like watching.
The winner of Smith vs Dodson should fight Magee after.
There are far more talented fighters out there, who i don't like watching.
The winner of Smith vs Dodson should fight Magee after.
Re: paul smith- opinions
Hopefully fight Magee for European title.
Re: paul smith- opinions
if dilks wins the commonwealth that would be another local derby title v title would be an easy sell
Re: paul smith- opinions
as long as they buy a DVD off me I dont care!!.........