KOed in 48 seconds by a man with one pro fight behind him.
Sataporn Singwancha
Sataporn Singwancha
Proved tonight that you can have 28 pro fights, win most of them and still not have a clue!
KOed in 48 seconds by a man with one pro fight behind him.
KOed in 48 seconds by a man with one pro fight behind him.
-
The Raw Prawn
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 303
- Joined: 17 Feb 2009, 19:25
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Didn't see the fight but Boxrec tells us that Singwancha's opponent Dilshod Mahmudov ia a well performed
Uzbek amateur at LW & Welter who did well at World Amateurs and 2 Olympics since 2003.
Could be one to watch.
Uzbek amateur at LW & Welter who did well at World Amateurs and 2 Olympics since 2003.
Could be one to watch.
-
Lethaleigh76
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 288
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 04:15
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
It was over pretty quick, Dilshod looks well schooled, good corner, and stopped him with some lethal body shots, speaking of body shots, did any one see Ranee Ganoy combination ? ![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
-
The Raw Prawn
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 303
- Joined: 17 Feb 2009, 19:25
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
On that same card Steve Maxwell's 2 nd round TKO over Matthew Paulley was unexpected.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Ranee looked sharp.Lethaleigh76 wrote:It was over pretty quick, Dilshod looks well schooled, good corner, and stopped him with some lethal body shots, speaking of body shots, did any one see Ranee Ganoy combination ?
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
The Raw Prawn wrote:Didn't see the fight but Boxrec tells us that Singwancha's opponent Dilshod Mahmudov ia a well performed
Uzbek amateur at LW & Welter who did well at World Amateurs and 2 Olympics since 2003.
Could be one to watch.
He beat Dib as an amateur. Lost 12-7 in last years Olympics to the eventual Gold Medal winner.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Soft, very soft.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
come on what did you expect the bloke been droped before the 3rd in his last 3 losses prior to this and he was up against a seasoned amateur like Dilshod
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
he needs a BIG fight, and yeah he always looks sharp, very strong, the move to the Grange old skool gym from the Bohol stable was a good move for RaneeBrute wrote:Ranee looked sharp.Lethaleigh76 wrote:It was over pretty quick, Dilshod looks well schooled, good corner, and stopped him with some lethal body shots, speaking of body shots, did any one see Ranee Ganoy combination ?
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Hermie Bohol made the decision for Ranee to switch gyms. He thought Billy Treacy and co could do more for Ranee than he could.harshfriller wrote:he needs a BIG fight, and yeah he always looks sharp, very strong, the move to the Grange old skool gym from the Bohol stable was a good move for RaneeBrute wrote:Ranee looked sharp.Lethaleigh76 wrote:It was over pretty quick, Dilshod looks well schooled, good corner, and stopped him with some lethal body shots, speaking of body shots, did any one see Ranee Ganoy combination ?
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
and they could do more, ever since they moved him there, hes been fighting, no one wanted to fight him wen he was with hermie and jeff Bohol
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Victor Oganov?Brute wrote:Proved tonight that you can have 28 pro fights, win most of them and still not have a clue!
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
No, Sataporn Singwancha. Don't you live in Thailand?
Oganov only loses to good fighters.
Oganov only loses to good fighters.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Brute wrote:No, Sataporn Singwancha. Don't you live in Thailand?
Oganov only loses to good fighters.
cant get anymore tougher than OGANOV
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
I knew you guys wouldn't like me saying it, but Oganov was roundly exposed in those two losses. Tough, game, yes... but a very inflated record, as proved when he stepped up.
Only loses to good fighters, true.. but he hasn't beaten any, either.
By the way, I know nothing about Sataporn Singwancha, so I'm not defending him. It's just that "winning most of your fights but still not having a clue" is hardly a new concept in boxing.
For balance, I submit my fellow Brit Nadeem Siddique: http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Only loses to good fighters, true.. but he hasn't beaten any, either.
By the way, I know nothing about Sataporn Singwancha, so I'm not defending him. It's just that "winning most of your fights but still not having a clue" is hardly a new concept in boxing.
For balance, I submit my fellow Brit Nadeem Siddique: http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Insignificant.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Singwancha? Oganov? Siddique? Or is it the best insult you can muster?Marlin wrote:Insignificant.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Oganov is heavily over rated, his power against well oiled machines is insignificant.