anthony is better.Autobarn wrote:no, it's the other way round.
mark my words.
anthony is better.Autobarn wrote:no, it's the other way round.
anyone else think lamont is better?Autobarn wrote:anthony is stiffer. lamont is the more fluid, with better combos. always rated lamont higher.
bradley has seriosuly improved. he really combined the boxing and the pressure very nicely.
Apart from your opinion, that should only go down the toilet bowl!hitman_hatton1 wrote:Autobarn wrote:anthony is stiffer. lamont is the more fluid, with better combos. always rated lamont higher.
bradley has seriosuly improved. he really combined the boxing and the pressure very nicely.
opinions make the world go round as they say. :)
i've always been realistic about hatton.DG. wrote:Apart from your opinion, that should only go down the toilet bowl!hitman_hatton1 wrote:Autobarn wrote:anthony is stiffer. lamont is the more fluid, with better combos. always rated lamont higher.
bradley has seriosuly improved. he really combined the boxing and the pressure very nicely.
opinions make the world go round as they say. :)
![]()
At least you have stopped licking Hattons butt.
Merry Christmas!
hitman_hatton1 wrote:the hall of fame will be on that phone to hatton in 5 or 6 yrs time.DG. wrote:Apart from your opinion, that should only go down the toilet bowl!hitman_hatton1 wrote:
opinions make the world go round as they say. :)
![]()
At least you have stopped licking Hattons butt.
Merry Christmas!
mark my words.