bellew v fry off

Post Reply
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

bellew v fry off

Post by 15829 »

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/bo ... -25534703/


gutted for tony this would of been a great for him to move up the rankings and get more exposure hope a decent british opponent can be found
Top
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by leforge »

Hope they get a good opponent in for Tony.
Top
bigdaddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 504
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:46

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by bigdaddy »

i no Ovil McKenzie would take the fight :TU:
Top
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by 15829 »

bigdaddy wrote:i no Ovil McKenzie would take the fight :TU:


maybe it could be a eliminator
Top
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by alexpaterson »

bigdaddy wrote:i no Ovil McKenzie would take the fight :TU:
Good shout, that would be a good fight for both parties
Top
Cossack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 43
Joined: 27 Dec 2009, 08:00

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by Cossack »

well, i guess bellew will look towards a bum now.
Top
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

really disapointed!! was looking forward to that
Top
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by Deserter »

Cossack wrote:well, i guess bellew will look towards a bum now.
And it's a happy new year from Lirva, the worst-disguised troll on the web :wink:

Getting back to the important part of the thread, Ovil would be an ideal replacement and a really good gauge re. Tony's development.
Top
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by taffytoon »

Well it looks like the Cleverly fight in January is also off, why not bring this fight forward and get ready to RUMMBLE :TU:

It could be for the British :box:
Top
freddie boswell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 52
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 23:54

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by freddie boswell »

NOOOO NOT MATHEW BARNEY!!
Joking aside he has fought and only narrowly lost for the euro title and went 12 with froch although I feel like ive overdosed on nightol whenever I watch him.A stoppage for bomber would be a good result.
Top
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by Deserter »

freddie boswell wrote:NOOOO NOT MATHEW BARNEY!!
Joking aside he has fought and only narrowly lost for the euro title and went 12 with froch although I feel like ive overdosed on nightol whenever I watch him.A stoppage for bomber would be a good result.
All wrong for Bomber at this stage I'd suggest - the classic maximum risk, minimum reward scenario
Top
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22951
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by mickey1975 »

Bomber,it would be madness to box Barney.Even if you win convincingly,you can be sure he would spoil enough to put off thousands of casual fans who will be at the arena that night.
Top
Chris W 1982
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by Chris W 1982 »

Bomber v Fry was never on
Top
Chris W 1982
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by Chris W 1982 »

Bomber v Fry was never on
Top
leeharding
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 589
Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 16:18

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by leeharding »

The quiet man 2004 wrote:Bomber v Fry was never on
i no that aswell cris firth told me weeks ago its not gonna happen the fry camp want more money than wat was offered.
Top
righthook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by righthook »

yeh the fry camp are making up excuses, its not the rite amount of money bla bla :lol:

people would have more respect for fry if he came out and said hes absolutely terrified to fight bellew. and he knows it wouldnt go past 3 rounds.

what a great excuse. the moneys not right. :lol: its not right even tho its probibly around the same he was offered to fight cleverly (bare in mind there were 2 belts on the line there.) not to mention the fact he got k.od by cleverly last fight and he thinks he is in a position to bargain? :KO:

whats the point in being a boxer fry? if when you get offered title shots in your own back yard you %hit you pants. :-?

if you won this fight you could then start demanding large amounts of money. i mean surly thats how it works?
Top
Andy
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2880
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 08:57

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by Andy »

Sixteen fights (70 rounds) and almost seven years in, Courtney's only real victory of note is a 6th rd ko of Tony Salam.
He will be 35 in May, times ticking. Should he really be holding out for big bucks ?
Top
bigdaddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 504
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:46

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by bigdaddy »

righthook wrote:yeh the fry camp are making up excuses, its not the rite amount of money bla bla :lol:

people would have more respect for fry if he came out and said hes absolutely terrified to fight bellew. and he knows it wouldnt go past 3 rounds.

what a great excuse. the moneys not right. :lol: its not right even tho its probibly around the same he was offered to fight cleverly (bare in mind there were 2 belts on the line there.) not to mention the fact he got k.od by cleverly last fight and he thinks he is in a position to bargain? :KO:

whats the point in being a boxer fry? if when you get offered title shots in your own back yard you %hit you pants. :-?

if you won this fight you could then start demanding large amounts of money. i mean surly thats how it works?
Dont think his sh,t him self............i respect him if the money peanuts why should he fight????????? after all bellew a good kid and it will sell a lot of tickets :TU:
Top
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11792
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by Old bones Ian »

You've got Darren Stubbs, he holds the Central area title, he is a toughman. Maybe he can be tempted to defend against Bellew.
Top
righthook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by righthook »

Old bones Ian wrote:You've got Darren Stubbs, he holds the Central area title, he is a toughman. Maybe he can be tempted to defend against Bellew.
He has publicly and personally told Bellew no.. :verysad:
Top
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by Asterix »

mexican roadsweeper wrote:Sixteen fights (70 rounds) and almost seven years in, Courtney's only real victory of note is a 6th rd ko of Tony Salam.
He will be 35 in May, times ticking. Should he really be holding out for big bucks ?
Holding out for the bigger purse signals to me that he's not confident.
Top
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by leforge »

If he been offered peanuts why fight. Limond was offered poor money too for fight with Mitchell.
Top
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by alexpaterson »

Danny MacIntosh would be an exciting fight and good for both imo
Top
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

alexpaterson wrote:Danny MacIntosh would be an exciting fight and good for both imo
Id love to see Bomber smash him....
Top
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: bellew v fry off

Post by 15829 »

hes meant to be fighting oakey, hatton won purse bids a while ago but iv not heard anything on when the fights taking place
Top
Post Reply

Return to “British & Irish”