Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Setenta lost money every day of their existence and went out of business fast, SKY has been making fortunes for 20 odd years now.
Sky lost absolute buckets for years and years and it was only because Murdoch had the vision and minerals to keep throwing huge amounts of money at it and the greed of football selling its soul that eventually worked.
If Setanta UK had a similar backer rather than fly by night venture capitalists, they would have still been around.
Wales wrote:You expect a multi million pound corporation to promote sports they dont hold the rights to? Come on lads, this is business.
Politely disagree mate. Don't say you're a news service when you're not. They either pretend non-Sky stuff doesn't exist or try and spoil highlights shows by flashing up results without warning.
Wales wrote:You expect a multi million pound corporation to promote sports they dont hold the rights to? Come on lads, this is business.
Politely disagree mate. Don't say you're a news service when you're not. They either pretend non-Sky stuff doesn't exist or try and spoil highlights shows by flashing up results without warning.
"SKY SPORTS news" not Sports News Ian.
Oh aye. I'd always read it as Sky...Sports News not Sky Sports...News
Suppose it's how you look at it. They certainly aren't an effective sports news service.
