Million Dollar Baby
Million Dollar Baby
I was just wondering has anyone here seen the new Boxing movie Million Dollar Baby staring Clint Eastwood?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405159/
Any views fight fans?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405159/
Any views fight fans?
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
-
shakermaker
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 333
- Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 11:21
Agree with that shakermaker, I was very sceptical initially but went to see it and it's defo worth a watch.shakermaker wrote:Its a very good movie, no feminsm on offer just a good story with some of the best boxing scenes I've seen since raging bull. One or two unrealistic bits involving the WBA champion but I'd recommned it to all
I just came across a Jan. 31, 1945 article today during my newspaper research that mentioned Johnny Greco, the "$200,000 kid," was expected to become a "Million Dollar Baby" by the end of the year--meaning his total accrued ring earnings. And a completely different newspaper article--of August 25--reported that Rocky Graziano had become the latest "Million Dollar Baby" the night before. Apparently, this is an old term.ILikeBeer wrote:I intend to see it. If only the name wasn't so lame.....
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13284
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Yeah I can't bring myself to watch it.Goz wrote:All reviews I've read see to rate it highly, it's just the plot sounds absolutely awful.
I'd guess Eastwood knows absolutely f*** all about boxing ( I've never, ever seen him at a fight ) so now we're meant to believe he's a wise, grizzled old boxing trainer? PULEEEZZZE.
But Eastwood is an actor, it's his job to make you believe is IS the part he is playing.MightyWarrior wrote:Yeah I can't bring myself to watch it.Goz wrote:All reviews I've read see to rate it highly, it's just the plot sounds absolutely awful.
I'd guess Eastwood knows absolutely f*** all about boxing ( I've never, ever seen him at a fight ) so now we're meant to believe he's a wise, grizzled old boxing trainer? PULEEEZZZE.
Whether he does that in this film is of course up for debate.
Harvey Kietel has never been a drunk, corrupt, drug taking Cop, but he did a great job playing one in Bad Lieutenant.
he did well on training that orangutan in every which way but loose, had a hell of a right hook.MightyWarrior wrote:Yeah I can't bring myself to watch it.Goz wrote:All reviews I've read see to rate it highly, it's just the plot sounds absolutely awful.
I'd guess Eastwood knows absolutely f*** all about boxing ( I've never, ever seen him at a fight ) so now we're meant to believe he's a wise, grizzled old boxing trainer? PULEEEZZZE.
"Right turn Clyde"J wrote:he did well on training that orangutan in every which way but loose, had a hell of a right hook.MightyWarrior wrote:Yeah I can't bring myself to watch it.Goz wrote:All reviews I've read see to rate it highly, it's just the plot sounds absolutely awful.
I'd guess Eastwood knows absolutely f*** all about boxing ( I've never, ever seen him at a fight ) so now we're meant to believe he's a wise, grizzled old boxing trainer? PULEEEZZZE.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13284
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Trouble is, he's not a very good actor is he.KOJOE90 wrote: But Eastwood is an actor, it's his job to make you believe is IS the part he is playing.
Whether he does that in this film is of course up for debate.
Harvey Kietel has never been a drunk, corrupt, drug taking Cop, but he did a great job playing one in Bad Lieutenant.
I mean, have you ever seen a film where Clint Eastwood plays anything else than...Clint Eastwood. He's exactly the same character in every film he's ever been in.
Plus I think he directed this film as well....
-
shakermaker
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 333
- Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 11:21
unforgiven, the good, the bad the ugly, dirty harry............the man is a legend
Trust me I hate female boxing and have never watched a fight but the movie is so well done that you don't care if it was a man, woman or dog.
Trust me I hate female boxing and have never watched a fight but the movie is so well done that you don't care if it was a man, woman or dog.
MightyWarrior wrote:Trouble is, he's not a very good actor is he.KOJOE90 wrote: But Eastwood is an actor, it's his job to make you believe is IS the part he is playing.
Whether he does that in this film is of course up for debate.
Harvey Kietel has never been a drunk, corrupt, drug taking Cop, but he did a great job playing one in Bad Lieutenant.
I mean, have you ever seen a film where Clint Eastwood plays anything else than...Clint Eastwood. He's exactly the same character in every film he's ever been in.
Plus I think he directed this film as well....
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13284
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
-
shakermaker
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 333
- Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 11:21
yeah I prefer De Niro but who is better than him??!!MightyWarrior wrote:Yes he's a legend, but like John Wayne, he only EVER plays himself.shakermaker wrote:unforgiven, the good, the bad the ugly, dirty harry............the man is a legend![]()
Squints......raises right eye brow......looks a bit angry........mumbles make my day punk etc![]()
De Nero he aint.
A lot of people say Tom Hanks only plays himself, same with Harrison Ford and Cruise but I don't take any notice so long as the film is good
The film is an adapted screenplay from a story in a book called 'Rope Burns' by the fantastically named 'F.X Toole'. This book is a collection of fictional short stories about boxing and genuinely is one of the best things i've ever read. I can recommend the book very highly, but haven't seen the film so can't comment. Hope it does the book justice but i've got my reservations about Clints(and Hollywoods) involvement too...
