Hahatoppity wrote:see, we do add something afterall.JDC wrote:I'm enjoying itMarlin wrote:Good thing you keep coming back, you are adding so much to the forum by telling everyone how little they add to the forum
Mundine Vs Woods
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Pure speculation:Tinnie wrote:Lets face it Mundine/Woods offers no surprises.
The real question is what washed league star is Mundine gonna recruit for his undercard this time?
....Martin Bella?
....Geoff Toovey?
.....in all seriousness i wouldnt be surprised if he pulls Big Willie out of his a$$ (no pun intended), i think he still hasnt found a club yet.
Mundine knows he cant attract an audience alone anymore........theres gonna be someone
Wendell Sailor
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
didn't he beat up warrick capper....... Not too hard to do that though.madcake wrote:Pure speculation:Tinnie wrote:Lets face it Mundine/Woods offers no surprises.
The real question is what washed league star is Mundine gonna recruit for his undercard this time?
....Martin Bella?
....Geoff Toovey?
.....in all seriousness i wouldnt be surprised if he pulls Big Willie out of his a$$ (no pun intended), i think he still hasnt found a club yet.
Mundine knows he cant attract an audience alone anymore........theres gonna be someone
Wendell Sailor
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
I hope the fight doesn't come off until Garth has at least 5 more good fights.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Did not help Anthony when they fought.smelodies wrote:adamheight wrote:smelodies, why dont you go and have a little chat with yourself? what a proposterous thing to saysmelodies wrote:Mundine is beatable, look at medleys face after the fight, hardly a mark so a lot must have landed on the gloves, medley caught him almost every time he opened up, if his work rate was 30% better he could have won that fight, the stupid basted wouldn't let his hands go for some reason.
Mundine is like kessler, he stands upright.
I'm talking about his defence, actually it is probably a bit better than kesslers.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
noobJDC wrote:I edited because I said I had 300 posts then noticed it was 400. Thats how much significance they have to me. I expect this is hard for you to grasp as you count every single post on your way to your next big target.toppity wrote:why the edit? Anyway, I'm sorry that you feel alienated. But that my friend, is life. It's no different anywhere else on the board. I suggest you go forth and find out.....no need to report back though.JDC wrote: Talk trash. lol
Seriously WTF - Pot Kettle, nuff said![]()
Ive added more constructive post in my 400 than you have in 80,000. Your a very sad individual indeed
Now why would I feel alienated from that?
I have better things to do than post whore. Do you see your number of post as an extension of yourself? Are you proud of such a great achievement?
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
harshfriller wrote:noobJDC wrote:
I edited because I said I had 300 posts then noticed it was 400. Thats how much significance they have to me. I expect this is hard for you to grasp as you count every single post on your way to your next big target.
Now why would I feel alienated from that?
I have better things to do than post whore. Do you see your number of post as an extension of yourself? Are you proud of such a great achievement?
I been here longer than you in terms of age and time on the forum.
Having looked through your recent posts I can't see any justification for your comment
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
noob x3JDC wrote:harshfriller wrote:noobJDC wrote:
I edited because I said I had 300 posts then noticed it was 400. Thats how much significance they have to me. I expect this is hard for you to grasp as you count every single post on your way to your next big target.
Now why would I feel alienated from that?
I have better things to do than post whore. Do you see your number of post as an extension of yourself? Are you proud of such a great achievement?![]()
I been here longer than you in terms of age and time on the forum.
Having looked through your recent posts I can't see any justification for your comment
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Childharshfriller wrote:noob x3JDC wrote:harshfriller wrote: noob![]()
I been here longer than you in terms of age and time on the forum.
Having looked through your recent posts I can't see any justification for your comment
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Yeah, and ur very first post on boxrec is very adult like and mature?JDC wrote:Childharshfriller wrote:noob x3JDC wrote:![]()
I been here longer than you in terms of age and time on the forum.
Having looked through your recent posts I can't see any justification for your comment
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
harshfriller wrote:Yeah, and ur very first post on boxrec is very adult like and mature?JDC wrote:Childharshfriller wrote: noob x3
Its alot more mture than writing noob at the end of someones post
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
noob ;;-)JDC wrote:harshfriller wrote:Yeah, and ur very first post on boxrec is very adult like and mature?JDC wrote: Child
Its alot more mture than writing noob at the end of someones post
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
WHAT WAS THIS FORUM TOPIC ABOUT AGAIN??? LOL!!
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Clinton Woodslaceemup wrote:WHAT WAS THIS FORUM TOPIC ABOUT AGAIN??? LOL!!
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
I'm seriously having to restrain my imature brain from typing NOOB.
But i will continue to suppress the urge.
But i will continue to suppress the urge.