TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post Reply
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by DG. »

The 15th January issue was very good.

I like the new format but not too sure about the letters at the front.

As Tony the Tiger would say... its Grrrrrrrrrrreat!


:TU:
Last edited by DG. on 17 Jan 2010, 10:42, edited 1 time in total.
dazzer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 280
Joined: 11 Apr 2009, 17:07

Re: TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by dazzer »

agreed not into letters right at the start, the guest columnist is great and the panel is a good read.

all in all tris dixon keep up the good work
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by Deserter »

Picked up a copy when I was back in the UK over Christmas and it's a promising start for the new ed. Introduced some nice new elements and having more 'personalities' and comment is a wise move as it's one area where magazines remain a better medium than digital.
I read somewhere else on this site that someone didn't like Tris's 'introduction', but it actually resonated with me - came across as someone completely committed to the mag and its future.
Good luck to all concerned.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by Adamj1987 »

i agree with the above posts the letters shouldnt be at the front but the guest columnist and tris dixon are doing great jobs
Rixxy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 350
Joined: 25 May 2009, 12:42

Re: TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by Rixxy »

yeah it was a great read. really like the guest spot, and the extra analysis. Keep it up.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by Hagler2002 »

what difference does it make where the letters go? Some people just don't like change, if that's the way the the new gaffer wants to do it so be it.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by DG. »

Hagler2002 wrote:what difference does it make where the letters go? Some people just don't like change, if that's the way the the new gaffer wants to do it so be it.
I like to read the letters LAST so I can gauge there reaction to previous weeks ACTIONS/ETC.

Its a personal preference... now sghut your cakr hole!

:lol:


:TU:
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by Hagler2002 »

DG. wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:what difference does it make where the letters go? Some people just don't like change, if that's the way the the new gaffer wants to do it so be it.
I like to read the letters LAST so I can gauge there reaction to previous weeks ACTIONS/ETC.

Its a personal preference... now sghut your cakr hole!

:lol:


:TU:

Read it back to front then :wink:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by DG. »

Hagler2002 wrote:
DG. wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:what difference does it make where the letters go? Some people just don't like change, if that's the way the the new gaffer wants to do it so be it.
I like to read the letters LAST so I can gauge there reaction to previous weeks ACTIONS/ETC.

Its a personal preference... now sghut your cakr hole!

:lol:


:TU:

Read it back to front then :wink:
:x :lol:
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by reggaereggae »

I may be wrong on my original assertation
Last edited by reggaereggae on 18 Jan 2010, 11:14, edited 1 time in total.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: TRIS DIXON/BOXING NEWS

Post by oliverfennell »

Hagler2002 wrote:what difference does it make where the letters go? Some people just don't like change, if that's the way the the new gaffer wants to do it so be it.
Of course it matters where in a magazine or newspaper you put something.
Post Reply