Goodnight, Irene wrote:Just asking about the accomplishments.
Rocky was more accomplished I guess.
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Just asking about the accomplishments.
If you want to sell Holmes on size be my guest but while Larry was big compared to Rocky he was not physically imposing like a Liston or a Foreman. Larry would undoubtedly try to box Marciano from the outside and the result of the fight would hinge on Holmes' abillity to keep Rocky off of him not by his abillity to outmuscle Marciano imo.ThatOne wrote: You better be careful. Rocky fans will tell you how big Carmine Vingo and Johnny Shkor was as if they were great fighters.
I just can’t see that. I’d expect Marciano to go out more like Cooney did (only he’d do better than Gerry)…MEISINGER wrote:i have thought long and hard about this one
i have watched as many fights of marciano's that are available
and i have seen nearly every larry holmes fight numerous times
and i by no means want to disrespect anyones oppinions
but i can not see any way in hell that marciano has a chance
larry is way to skilled for the rock......larry by brutal ko in 5
Ha ha.ThatOne wrote:
You better be careful. Rocky fans will tell you how big Carmine Vingo and Johnny Shkor was as if they were great fighters.
What's wrong with rematches?Controversial wrote:Ha ha.ThatOne wrote:
You better be careful. Rocky fans will tell you how big Carmine Vingo and Johnny Shkor was as if they were great fighters.
To be honest I could never really understand all the hype given to Vingo, his record was quite average 16-1 (and 4 of these fights were rematches). He also didn't beat anyone of note. I've read how much of a terrific puncher he was yet his record doesn't reflect this either, only 7 stoppages in 16 wins.
And Marciano said it was the hardest fight of his career.
Nothing wrong with rematches, I just meant for someone with only 16 wins to have 4 sets of rematches is quite high, thats half the number of his wins.Ezzard wrote:
What's wrong with rematches?
Five sounds about right...because Marciano wasn't as tough --- or anywhere near as good --- as Evengelista, LeDoux, Frank, & the slew of opponents who made it past five rounds.MEISINGER wrote:i have thought long and hard about this one
i have watched as many fights of marciano's that are available
and i have seen nearly every larry holmes fight numerous times
and i by no means want to disrespect anyones oppinions
but i can not see any way in hell that marciano has a chance
larry is way to skilled for the rock......larry by brutal ko in 5
i do not think you thought that comment out to well.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Five sounds about right...because Marciano wasn't as tough --- or anywhere near as good --- as Evengelista, LeDoux, Frank, & the slew of opponents who made it past five rounds.MEISINGER wrote:i have thought long and hard about this one
i have watched as many fights of marciano's that are available
and i have seen nearly every larry holmes fight numerous times
and i by no means want to disrespect anyones oppinions
but i can not see any way in hell that marciano has a chance
larry is way to skilled for the rock......larry by brutal ko in 5
there is also no logic to a 5'10'' short armed 185lb manGoodnight, Irene wrote:It's called being glib.
There is nothing logical about Larry Holmes KOing Rocky Marciano in five rounds.
Goodnight, Irene wrote:You're right.
Marciano wasn't in the same league as an old Norton, a green Witherspoon, or a 19-8-0 Weaver --- all of whom gave a prime or borderline-prime Holmes serious trouble.
Even Zanon, who had the punch resistance of a 12-year-old, lasted six rounds with Holmes.
Hmm not sure about that, fitness wise not many can compete with Marcianos stamina and endurance levels. I think Holmes wins but more to his overall size, boxing ability, jab and decent chin.MEISINGER wrote: holmes was a better athlete than marciano
Your sizes are slightly out but thats how I see the fight. Size doesn't always matter but when you are talking about a big world class boxer against a small world class slugger then I find it hard to see Marciano being skilled or strong enough to impose himself on Holmes.ThatOne wrote:
Styles make fights as well as the age of the participants.
Holmes is too big, too skilled, too fast for Marciano. We are talking about a 5'9 190 pound boxer with a 67 inch reach going up against a 6'4 215 pound boxer with a 80 inch reach.
Holmes wins a lopsided decision unless the bout is stopped against Rocky's will on cuts.
Controversial wrote:Hmm not sure about that, fitness wise not many can compete with Marcianos stamina and endurance levels. I think Holmes wins but more to his overall size, boxing ability, jab and decent chin.MEISINGER wrote: holmes was a better athlete than marciano
Your sizes are slightly out but thats how I see the fight. Size doesn't always matter but when you are talking about a big world class boxer against a small world class slugger then I find it hard to see Marciano being skilled or strong enough to impose himself on Holmes.ThatOne wrote:
Styles make fights as well as the age of the participants.
Holmes is too big, too skilled, too fast for Marciano. We are talking about a 5'9 190 pound boxer with a 67 inch reach going up against a 6'4 215 pound boxer with a 80 inch reach.
Holmes wins a lopsided decision unless the bout is stopped against Rocky's will on cuts.
Robinson wrote:Rocky did not have the best set of skills and started some what late.
BUt here is the thing. He became a student of the game and trained
harder than any other man going at that time.
A man that pushes himself that hard in the gym, digs so deep during
a fight and refuses the concept of defeat...is a danger. Some times
during a fight, when your hurt, gassed, tired or things are not going
your way...you some times ask yourself..."should I just lose, and
go home early", nearly every fighter has this moment, however brief.
I do not believe Marciano ever had this moment.
I also do not believe Holmes did either...hence his longevity and his
ability to get up from a KO and turn things around.
Well, Holmes punched like a 185lb man so Marciano should be able to take it allright.MEISINGER wrote:there is also no logic to a 5'10'' short armed 185lb manGoodnight, Irene wrote:It's called being glib.
There is nothing logical about Larry Holmes KOing Rocky Marciano in five rounds.
competing with superheavyweights