Khan or Warren

Who is Right

Warren
35
47%
Khan
39
53%
 
Total votes: 74

Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan or Warren

Post by Spud »

chopsticks - lirva
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan or Warren

Post by DG. »

Cotto10 wrote:yeah right, ferking peasant :lol:
You love with Mummy - you little knob.


:lol:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan or Warren

Post by DG. »

Cotto10 wrote:
DG. wrote:
Cotto10 wrote: I am very jealous of you - I have a bus pass and smell of piss :lol:
You love with Mummy - you little knob.


:lol:
My name is semi knobhala - i bum little dogs for fun :lol:



:o
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Khan or Warren

Post by dondada »

I don't know about you, but I'm convinced by both sides of this compelling argument.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan or Warren

Post by DG. »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:I don't know about you, but I'm convinced by both sides of this compelling argument.
Its over - Khans gone.

Fwank should concentrate on his fighters.

Bet he wishes he made Khan Vs MItchell now.


:lol:
Jared Brasher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 25
Joined: 04 Nov 2007, 12:50

Re: Khan or Warren

Post by Jared Brasher »

Chopsticks- most of your points are OK, but when considering Khan's opponents after Prescott, you failed to mention that Barerra had a gash the size of a melon slice on his head and Fagan broke his LEG in the very first round. Silly that you'd actually think it was some "brilliant ploy" on behalf of Fwank to hire the services of these 2 warriors, as if he knew these injuries would happen. If they hadn't happened, it could have been a whole other story...
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan or Warren

Post by DG. »

I can not beliive the people who side with FWANK.

Its business, the boy was out of contract. Simples!


Image
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Khan or Warren

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

DG. wrote:
Cotto10 wrote:
DG. wrote: You love with Mummy - you little knob.


:lol:
My name is semi knobhala - i bum little dogs for fun :lol:


:o

Cotto didn't write that - you overwrote his previous posts! Thats so 2005 DG! :lol:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan or Warren

Post by DG. »

Carlos-Wigan wrote:
DG. wrote:
Cotto10 wrote: My name is semi knobhala - i bum little dogs for fun :lol:


:o

Cotto didn't write that - you overwrote his previous posts! Thats so 2005 DG! :lol:

2010!

:OhYes:

Cotto10 has been sending me PMs acting up.


To 'overtype' is known as to 'Carlos Wigan'.

:lol:
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5841
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Khan or Warren

Post by tonyevs »

Khan did the right thing as far as I`m concerned.

After what fWank did to Calzaghe. Any person would have to be mad to trust or do buisiness with him as far as I`m concerned.
Khan paid fWank for the job he did. fWank didn`t do it as a charity thing. So now Khan is looking at paying somebody else to better himself even further .. after all boxing is a buisiness.

Big respect to Khan :TU:
Post Reply